IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipas1057521924004654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive power discrepancy and corporate ESG greenwashing

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Xinlu
  • Huang, Xiaohui
  • Liu, Fang
  • Pan, Lin

Abstract

Originating from the theory of organizational hierarchy, the concept of power discrepancy among corporate executives has garnered scholarly attention due to its roots in the unequal distribution of authority and influence within the upper echelons of management. This paper explores the realm of corporate ESG greenwashing, a deceptive practice masking genuine environmental, social, and governance responsibilities, and empirically investigates the influence of executive power discrepancies on such practices. Findings indicate a direct correlation between increased executive power discrepancies and a heightened propensity towards ESG greenwashing. Furthermore, the impact of this discrepancy is notably more pronounced in non-state-owned entities, corporations operating in highly marketized regions, and those with substantial financing constraints. This study contributes to the nuanced understanding of how disparities in executive power shape corporate ESG conduct, enriches the discourse on corporate governance structures, and fosters the evolution of theories related to internal governance and social accountability, offering vital practical insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Xinlu & Huang, Xiaohui & Liu, Fang & Pan, Lin, 2024. "Executive power discrepancy and corporate ESG greenwashing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924004654
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924004654
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924004654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.