IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7307-d1463811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can the Government Promote Sustainable Cooperation between Schools and Enterprises? A Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hexin Wang

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Chao Liu

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yu Dai

    (Education Science Research Center, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    School of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Sustainable cooperation between schools and enterprises is crucial to maintaining a dynamic balance between the supply and demand of talents and driving the advancement of new quality productive forces. As a result, facilitating school–enterprise cooperation has become an important concern in many countries. However, there remains a gap in understanding the approaches taken by central and local governments to foster such cooperation through the lens of evolutionary game theory. Therefore, this paper develops a quadrilateral evolutionary game model involving schools, enterprises, the central government, and local governments by building the payoff matrix and calculating expected payoffs of different strategies to analyze the conditions under which governments can effectively promote school–enterprise cooperation. Our findings indicate that benefit is a decisive factor that affects the strategies of all parties. Increasing incentives and penalties from the central government and local governments can stimulate school–enterprise cooperation, but these measures are not sustainable in the long term. Additionally, the impact of the central government’s incentives and penalties on local governments in promoting school–enterprise cooperation is limited. Enhancing policy efficacy and the practical outcomes of school–enterprise cooperation is essential, which not only strengthens the bond between schools and enterprises but also ensures deep and enduring governmental involvement. Some suggestions are put forward at the end.

Suggested Citation

  • Hexin Wang & Chao Liu & Yu Dai, 2024. "How Can the Government Promote Sustainable Cooperation between Schools and Enterprises? A Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7307-:d:1463811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7307/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7307/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritzberger, Klaus & Weibull, Jorgen W, 1995. "Evolutionary Selection in Normal-Form Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(6), pages 1371-1399, November.
    2. Shi, Yingying & Pan, Min & Peng, Daiyan, 2017. "Replicator dynamics and evolutionary game of social tolerance: The role of neutral agents," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 10-14.
    3. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    4. Keld Laursen & Toke Reichstein & Ammon Salter, 2011. "Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University-Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 507-523.
    5. Chao Liu & Hexin Wang & Yu Dai, 2023. "Sustainable Cooperation between Schools, Enterprises, and Government: An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Valeria Arza, 2010. "Channels, benefits and risks of public—private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(7), pages 473-484, August.
    7. Wang, Qiang & He, Nanrong & Chen, Xiaojie, 2018. "Replicator dynamics for public goods game with resource allocation in large populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 162-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Liu & Hexin Wang & Yu Dai, 2023. "Sustainable Cooperation between Schools, Enterprises, and Government: An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    3. Viossat, Yannick, 2008. "Evolutionary dynamics may eliminate all strategies used in correlated equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 27-43, July.
    4. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    5. Wei Wang & Yanbin Li & Jinzhong Li & Yun Li, 2024. "Can pumped-storage power stations stimulate rural revitalization? Evidence from the four-party evolutionary game," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 595-645, July.
    6. Demichelis, Stefano & Ritzberger, Klaus, 2003. "From evolutionary to strategic stability," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 51-75, November.
    7. Yi Zhang & Kaihua Chen & Guilong Zhu & Richard C. M. Yam & Jiancheng Guan, 2016. "Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects: an ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1383-1415, September.
    8. Peiling Jiang & Wenbing Shui & Mingwei He, 2024. "The Evolution of Government–Enterprise Strategies of “Expressway + Logistics Distribution”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Hofbauer, Josef & Weibull, Jorgen W., 1996. "Evolutionary Selection against Dominated Strategies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 558-573, November.
    10. Ziao Zhou & Yuan Li & Yongli Zhang, 2023. "Carbon Offsetting-Driven Multi-Actor Low-Carbon Collaborative Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Xia, Xiaoning & Li, Pengwei & Cheng, Yang, 2023. "Tripartite evolutionary game analysis of power battery carbon footprint disclosure under the EU battery regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    12. Qianwen Wu & Qiangqiang Wang & Yongwu Dai, 2023. "Analysis of Strategy Selection in Third-Party Governance of Rural Environmental Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Weixin Yang & Yunpeng Yang, 2020. "Research on Air Pollution Control in China: From the Perspective of Quadrilateral Evolutionary Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    15. Yangyang Li & Jianing Sun & Juan Chen & Jinlei Li & Li Sun & Kewang Cao, 2024. "How to Promote the Development of Cultural and Creative Industries from an Evolutionary Game Perspective: Policy Mechanisms for Certification + Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-38, May.
    16. Reinoud Joosten & Berend Roorda, 2011. "On evolutionary ray-projection dynamics," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 74(2), pages 147-161, October.
    17. Robert J. W. Tijssen & Alfredo Yegros-Yegros & Jos J. Winnink, 2016. "University–industry R&D linkage metrics: validity and applicability in world university rankings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 677-696, November.
    18. Ma, Xuan & Yu, Deqing & Wang, Ke, 2024. "Unraveling the intricacies of panic buying: An evolutionary game-theoretic exploration of the evolution and intervention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Reinoud Joosten & Berend Roorda, 2008. "Generalized projection dynamics in evolutionary game theory," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2008-11, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    20. Yongli Tang & Kazuyuki Motohashi & Xinyue Hu & Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, 2020. "University-industry interaction and product innovation performance of Guangdong manufacturing firms: the roles of regional proximity and research quality of universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 578-618, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7307-:d:1463811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.