IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6555-d1447095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Body Positivity Movement: Analysis of the Discourse on Body Image in Korean Society

Author

Listed:
  • Na-Young Choi

    (Department of Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea)

  • Young-Vin Kim

    (Department of Sport & Leisure Studies, Division of Arts & Health Care, Myongji College, Seoul 03656, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hyunkyun Ahn

    (Department of Sport & Leisure Studies, Division of Arts & Health Care, Myongji College, Seoul 03656, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In contemporary society, the discourse on body image is increasingly emerging as a notable social issue. In particular, the body positivity movement is promoting healthy body image and self-esteem through various means. This study was conducted to analyze the discourse on sustainable body image in Korean society. User-generated content from 1 January 2014 to 31 July 2023 underwent data refinement and term frequency (TF), TF–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF), and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) analyses. The number of blog posts in 2020 was nearly triple the number in 2019. Thus, the analysis period was divided into first (from 2014 to 2019) and second (from 2020 to 31 July 2023) periods. The TF–IDF analysis showed that shooting, photo, diet, exercise, goal, and challenge were among the top words in the first period, while Instagram-related words were mosr frequent in the second period. This finding suggested that social distancing policies significantly affected social media usage. The LDA analysis revealed five topics that were common in the first and second periods and three topics that emerged in the second period. Overall, while Western societies tend to idealize specific body types, body image discourse in Korea is centered around exercise as a means to achieve “photography” or “photo shoot”-related goals. Exercise is perceived as an activity performed for pleasure rather than attaining a particular body shape. Furthermore, there is a desire to document one’s body beautifully and maintain exercise habits in the long run. The results of this study could serve as foundational material for establishing and sustaining a positive body image culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Na-Young Choi & Young-Vin Kim & Hyunkyun Ahn, 2024. "Sustainable Body Positivity Movement: Analysis of the Discourse on Body Image in Korean Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6555-:d:1447095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Di Michele & Francesca Guizzo & Natale Canale & Fabio Fasoli & Francesca Carotta & Arianna Pollini & Mara Cadinu, 2023. "#SexyBodyPositive: When Sexualization Does Not Undermine Young Women’s Body Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Jiabei Xia & Tailai Wu & Liqin Zhou, 2021. "Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diwanji, Vaibhav S. & Cortese, Juliann, 2020. "Contrasting user generated videos versus brand generated videos in ecommerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sánchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    4. M. S. Balaji & Subhash Jha & Marla B. Royne, 2015. "Customer e-complaining behaviours using social media," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11-12), pages 633-654, August.
    5. Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma Divakaran & Jie Xiong, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Post-Print hal-03700393, HAL.
    6. Agrawal, Shiv Ratan & Mittal, Divya, 2022. "Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    8. Ivanete Schneider Hahn & Flavia Luciane Scherer & Kenny Basso & Marindia Brachak dos Santos, 2016. "Consumer Trust in and Emotional Response to Advertisements on Social Media and their Influence on Brand Evaluation," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(4), pages 49-71, July.
    9. Divakaran, Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma & Xiong, Jie, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Baccarella, Christian V. & Wagner, Timm F. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2018. "Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 431-438.
    11. N. Serdar Sever & Goknil Nur Sever & Salar Kuhzady, 2015. "The Evaluation of Potentials of Gamification in Tourism Marketing Communication," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(10), pages 188-202, October.
    12. Hofman-Kohlmeyer Magdalena, 2021. "Brand-Related User-Generated Content in Simulation Video Games: Qualitative Research Among Polish Players," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 61-87, March.
    13. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Stefania Farace & Gaetano Nino Miceli, 2018. "User-Generated Systems of Signs and Meanings in Product Customization: Taxonomies and Research Directions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 61-83.
    14. He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Lee, Ruby P. & Wang, Yonggui & Pohlmann, Attila, 2017. "Consumers' Role Performance and Brand Identification: Evidence from a Survey and a Longitudinal Field Experiment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Kawaf, Fatema & Istanbulluoglu, Doga, 2019. "Online fashion shopping paradox: The role of customer reviews and facebook marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 144-153.
    16. Symeon Symeonidis & Georgios Peikos & Avi Arampatzis, 2022. "Unsupervised consumer intention and sentiment mining from microblogging data as a business intelligence tool," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 6007-6036, November.
    17. Ng Kar Weng, 2020. "Facebook Engagement for Craft Entrepreneurs in Malaysia: Project BATU," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(12), pages 21-31, December.
    18. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    19. Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, 2024. "Accessibility Matters: Investigating the Usability of Social Media Platforms for Individuals with Motor Disabilities," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, June.
    20. Wang, Saerom & Kirillova, Ksenia & Lehto, Xinran, 2017. "Reconciling unsatisfying tourism experiences: Message type effectiveness and the role of counterfactual thinking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 233-243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6555-:d:1447095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.