IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6532-d1446466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Management of Protected Areas in Galapagos: 60 Years after Its Declaration as a National Park

Author

Listed:
  • María Maestro

    (Faculty of Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

  • María Luisa Pérez-Cayeiro

    (Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

  • Harry Reyes

    (Galápagos National Park Directorate, Av. Charles Darwin s/n, Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador)

  • Juan Adolfo Chica-Ruiz

    (Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

Abstract

The Galapagos Islands are one of the most emblematic protected areas on the planet and also one of the most studied. Their main economic activity is tourism, which has grown rapidly in recent years. The increase in tourists is associated with the increase in population and the introduction of invasive species, which puts conservation at risk. This makes adequate management even more necessary and relevant on an international scale since the economy of Galapagos depends on the good state of conservation of its ecosystems and species. Numerous studies have shown that social factors, rather than physical–natural ones, determine the success or failure of a marine protected area (MPA), so they must be urgently incorporated into all phases of MPA management. In this study, we analyzed the management of the protected areas of Galapagos, including the National Park and the Marine Reserve, with the purpose of highlighting their weaknesses and strengths. The methodology used presents five prescribed scenarios in which priority is given to one or other factors, each of which has an impact on the biophysical and socio-economic systems that are influenced by the MPA. These scenarios were called proactive, interactive, centralized, learning, and formal management. Data were obtained through a comprehensive literature review and primary data collection methods, including in-depth interviews with key stakeholders and DPNG managers, as well as direct observations. Interviewees covered the main relevant sectors in the archipelago (fishing, tourism, and conservation). The results show that the archipelago’s protected areas follow a proactive management model with a continuous feedback loop. This feedback is a key element in any adaptive management process, which also allows practitioners to anticipate future problems. Both public participation and strategic planning are essential.

Suggested Citation

  • María Maestro & María Luisa Pérez-Cayeiro & Harry Reyes & Juan Adolfo Chica-Ruiz, 2024. "Analysis of the Management of Protected Areas in Galapagos: 60 Years after Its Declaration as a National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6532-:d:1446466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6532/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6532/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hind, E.J. & Hiponia, M.C. & Gray, T.S., 2010. "From community-based to centralised national management--A wrong turning for the governance of the marine protected area in Apo Island, Philippines?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 54-62, January.
    2. Abecasis, Rita Costa & Longnecker, Nancy & Schmidt, Luisa & Clifton, Julian, 2013. "Marine conservation in remote small island settings: Factors influencing marine protected area establishment in the Azores," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Castrejón, Mauricio & Charles, Anthony, 2013. "Improving fisheries co-management through ecosystem-based spatial management: The Galapagos Marine Reserve," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 235-245.
    4. Terry P. Hughes & James T. Kerry & Mariana Álvarez-Noriega & Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero & Kristen D. Anderson & Andrew H. Baird & Russell C. Babcock & Maria Beger & David R. Bellwood & Ray Berkelmans & T, 2017. "Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7645), pages 373-377, March.
    5. Liliana A. Alencastro & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2023. "Preferences of Experiential Fishing Tourism in a Marine Protected Area: A Study in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Viteri Mejía, César & Brandt, Sylvia, 2015. "Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Serena Muccitelli & Carolina Pozzi & Romina D’Ascanio & Stefano Magaudda, 2023. "Environmental Contract: A Collaborative Tool to Improve the Multilevel Governance of European MPAs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Daniela Marzo & Iacopo Cavallini & Luisa Scaccia & Paolo Guidetti & Antonio Di Franco & Antonio Calò & Federico Niccolini, 2023. "Drivers of Small-Scale Fishers’ Acceptability across Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas at Different Stages of Establishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Han-Shen Chen & Chu-Wei Chen, 2019. "Economic Valuation of Green Island, Taiwan: A Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Matthew Oliver Ralp Dimal & Victor Jetten, 2020. "Analyzing preference heterogeneity for soil amenity improvements using discrete choice experiment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1323-1351, February.
    4. Hamman, Evan & Brodie, Jon & Eberhard, Rachel & Deane, Felicity & Bode, Michael, 2022. "Regulating land use in the catchment of the Great Barrier Reef," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Jamie M. Chen & Junzhou Zhang & Peter Nijkamp, 2016. "A regional analysis of willingness-to-pay in Asian cruise markets," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(4), pages 809-824, August.
    6. Guy Jackson, 2023. "Environmental subjectivities and experiences of climate extreme-driven loss and damage in northern Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(7), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Chaojiao Sun & Alistair J. Hobday & Scott A. Condie & Mark E. Baird & J. Paige Eveson & Jason R. Hartog & Anthony J. Richardson & Andrew D. L. Steven & Karen Wild-Allen & Russell C. Babcock & Dezhou Y, 2022. "Ecological Forecasting and Operational Information Systems Support Sustainable Ocean Management," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Chi Chiu Cheang & Yue Ma & Lincoln Fok, 2018. "Occurrence and Composition of Microplastics in the Seabed Sediments of the Coral Communities in Proximity of a Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Nan Hu & Paul E. Bourdeau & Johan Hollander, 2024. "Responses of marine trophic levels to the combined effects of ocean acidification and warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Karki, Seema & Webb, J Angus & Stewardson, Michael J. & Fowler, Keirnan & Kattel, Giri Raj, 2023. "Basin-scale riverine ecosystem services vary with network geometry," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Ding, Zhixiong & Wu, Wei, 2022. "Type II absorption thermal battery for temperature upgrading: Energy storage heat transformer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Mar Vila & Gerard Costa, 2024. "Post-Pandemic Shifts in Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors in a Marine Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Horigue, Vera & Richards, Russell & Taju, Alima & Maina, Joseph, 2023. "Disentangling the influence of the economic development discourse on the management of national parks through systems thinking: Case studies from the Philippines and Mozambique," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Nils Rädecker & Stéphane Escrig & Jorge E. Spangenberg & Christian R. Voolstra & Anders Meibom, 2023. "Coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling regulates the cnidarian–algal symbiosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Kusumawati, Ika & Huang, Hsiang-Wen, 2015. "Key factors for successful management of marine protected areas: A comparison of stakeholders׳ perception of two MPAs in Weh island, Sabang, Aceh, Indonesia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 465-475.
    16. K. M. Quigley & M. J. H. Oppen, 2022. "Predictive models for the selection of thermally tolerant corals based on offspring survival," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Lliso, Bosco & Pascual, Unai & Engel, Stefanie & Mariel, Petr, 2020. "Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Sui, Zengguang & Wu, Wei, 2022. "A comprehensive review of membrane-based absorbers/desorbers towards compact and efficient absorption refrigeration systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 563-593.
    19. Riccardo Scarpa & Cristiano Franceschinis & Mara Thiene, 2017. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of the Logit-Mixed Logit under Asymmetry and Multimodality," Working Papers in Economics 17/23, University of Waikato.
    20. Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Establishment and Application of an Evaluation Model for Orchid Island Sustainable Tourism Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6532-:d:1446466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.