IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6409-d1443722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Drivers of Carbon Storage from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of the Region along the Middle and Lower Yellow River, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shu An

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Yifang Duan

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Dengshuai Chen

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Xiaoman Wu

    (School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

Abstract

Carbon storage (C-storage) is a critical indicator of ecosystem services, and it plays a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and driving sustainability. Its assessment provides essential insights for enhancing environmental protection, optimizing land use, and formulating policies that support long-term ecological and economic sustainability. Previous research on C-storage in the Yellow River Basin has mainly concentrated on the spatiotemporal fluctuations of C-storage and the investigation of natural influencing factors. However, research combining human activity factors to explore the influences on C-storage is limited. In this paper, based on the assessment of the spatiotemporal evolution of C-storage in the region along the Middle and Lower Yellow River (MLYR), the influences of anthropogenic and natural factors on C-storage were explored from the perspective of sustainable development. The findings reflected the relationship between socio-economic activities and the ecological environment from a sustainable development perspective, providing important scientific evidence for the formulation of sustainability policies in the region. We noticed the proportion of arable land was the highest, reaching 40%. The increase of construction land because of the fast urbanization mainly came from arable land and grassland. During the past 15 years, the cumulative loss of C-storage was 71.17 × 10 6 t. The high-value of C-storage was primarily situated in hilly areas, and the area of C-storage hotspots was shrinking. The aggregation effect of low-value C-storage was strengthening, while that of high-value C-storage was weakening. The dominant factors (q > 0.5) influencing the spatiotemporal variation of C-storage in the region along the Middle Yellow River (MYR) were temperature and precipitation, while the primary factor in the region along the Lower Yellow River (LYR) was temperature. Overall, meteorological factors were the main determinants across the entire study area. Additionally, compared to the MYR, anthropogenic factors had a smaller impact on the spatiotemporal evolution of C-storage in the LYR, but their influence has been increasing over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu An & Yifang Duan & Dengshuai Chen & Xiaoman Wu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Drivers of Carbon Storage from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of the Region along the Middle and Lower Yellow River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6409-:d:1443722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian P. Giardina & Michael G. Ryan, 2000. "Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6780), pages 858-861, April.
    2. Furui Xi & Gang Lin & Yanan Zhao & Xiang Li & Zhiyu Chen & Chenglong Cao, 2023. "Land Use Optimization and Carbon Storage Estimation in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Makkonen, Marika & Huttunen, Suvi & Primmer, Eeva & Repo, Anna & Hildén, Mikael, 2015. "Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 153-162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Liu & Dongdong Yang & Lei Cao & Bruce Anderson, 2022. "Assessment and Prediction of Carbon Storage Based on Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics in the Tropics: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Justus Eberl & Evgenia Gordeeva & Norbert Weber, 2021. "The Policy Coherence Framework Approach in a Multi-Level Analysis of European, German and Thuringian Climate Policy with a Special Focus on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)," World, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Helen Ding & Sonja Teelucksingh, 2010. "European Forests and Carbon Sequestration Services: An Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts," Working Papers 2010.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Kun Zhang & Yu Wang & Ali Mamtimin & Yongqiang Liu & Lifang Zhang & Jiacheng Gao & Ailiyaer Aihaiti & Cong Wen & Meiqi Song & Fan Yang & Chenglong Zhou & Wen Huo, 2024. "Simulation and Attribution Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Variation in Carbon Storage in the Northern Slope Economic Belt of Tianshan Mountains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Yimin Li & Xue Yang & Bowen Wu & Juanzhen Zhao & Xuanlun Deng, 2023. "Impervious Surface Mapping Based on Remote Sensing and an Optimized Coupled Model: The Dianchi Basin as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Feng Tang & Xu Zhou & Li Wang & Yangjian Zhang & Meichen Fu & Pengtao Zhang, 2021. "Linking Ecosystem Service and MSPA to Construct Landscape Ecological Network of the Huaiyang Section of the Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Mäkelä, Marileena, 2017. "Environmental impacts and aspects in the forest industry: What kind of picture do corporate environmental reports provide?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 178-191.
    8. Bouwma, Irene & Schleyer, Christian & Primmer, Eeva & Winkler, Klara Johanna & Berry, Pam & Young, Juliette & Carmen, Esther & Špulerová, Jana & Bezák, Peter & Preda, Elena & Vadineanu, Angheluta, 2018. "Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 213-222.
    9. Muhammad Waseem Rasheed & Jialiang Tang & Abid Sarwar & Suraj Shah & Naeem Saddique & Muhammad Usman Khan & Muhammad Imran Khan & Shah Nawaz & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Marjan Aziz & Muhammad Sultan, 2022. "Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Post, Joachim & Krysanova, Valentina & Suckow, Felicitas & Mirschel, Wilfried & Rogasik, Jutta & Merbach, Ines, 2007. "Integrated eco-hydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 93-109.
    11. Xiongwen Chen & Wilfred Post & Richard Norby & Aimée Classen, 2011. "Modeling soil respiration and variations in source components using a multi-factor global climate change experiment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 459-480, August.
    12. Trotter, Philipp A. & Brophy, Aoife, 2022. "Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    13. Yan-Jie Gu & Cheng-Long Han & Meng Kong & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Feng-Min Li, 2022. "Film Mulching with Low Phosphorus Application Improves Soil Organic Carbon and Its Decomposability in a Semiarid Agroecosystem," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Chaya, Wirawat & Jesdapipat, Sitanon & Tripetchkul, Sudarut & Santitaweeroek, Yuwanan & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2019. "Challenges and pitfalls in implementing Thailand's ethanol plan: Integrated policy coherence and gap analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1050-1063.
    15. Wenting Huang & Long Guo & Ting Zhang & Ting Chen & Longqian Chen & Long Li & Xundi Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Territorial Spatial Transformation on Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Suqian, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    16. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen-Kurki, K. & Lyytikainen, V. & Matthies, B.D. & Horcea-Milcu, A-I., 2022. "Circular bioeconomy: Actors and dynamics of knowledge co-production in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. E. Cienciala & Z. Exnerová & J. Macků & V. Henžlík, 2006. "Forest topsoil organic carbon content in Southwest Bohemiaregion," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(9), pages 387-398.
    18. Ying Jiang & Yilinuer Alifujiang & Pingping Feng & Ping Yang & Jianpeng Feng, 2024. "A Simulated Assessment of Land Use and Carbon Storage Changes in the Yanqi Basin under Different Development Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Kumar Bahadur Darjee & Ramesh Kumar Sunam & Michael Köhl & Prem Raj Neupane, 2021. "Do National Policies Translate into Local Actions? Analyzing Coherence between Climate Change Adaptation Policies and Implications for Local Adaptation in Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    20. Yuncheng Jiang & Bin Ouyang & Zhigang Yan, 2024. "The Response of Carbon Storage to Multi-Objective Land Use/Cover Spatial Optimization and Vulnerability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6409-:d:1443722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.