IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6381-d1442847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Geographical Distribution, Strategies, and Environmental and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Success of Land-Based Restoration: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan O. Hernandez

    (Department of Forest Biological Sciences, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines)

  • Damcelle T. Cortes

    (Institute for Governance and Rural Development, College of Public Affairs and Development, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines)

  • Byung Bae Park

    (Department of Environment and Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The effectiveness of restoration programs may differ in terms of environmental and socioeconomic metrics, depending on the strategies employed and ecological settings. Thus, we synthesized different restoration strategies and discussed the environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing restoration success. In the present systematic review, we examined peer-reviewed articles published between 1990 and 2024 that discussed strategies and factors impacting land-based restoration. Only 227 of 55,229 articles from ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases met the inclusion criteria. China, Brazil, and India are more active in conducting studies about land restoration compared to other regions, particularly in megadiverse countries in Asia with high degradation rates. There is a strong emphasis on practical and adaptive restoration strategies, including soil and water management (e.g., agroforestry), the use of native plant species, and weed and invasive species management. The prevalence of Acacia , Leucaena , and Eucalyptus species in restoration programs can inform decisions about effective species selection. Here, a holistic understanding of the complex ecological processes is crucial for the development of effective restoration strategies. Although policy frameworks have received less attention in restoration research, their incorporation into restoration projects can help address policy implications for land-based restoration. Overall, successful restoration necessitates a thorough understanding of the optimal strategies and environmental and socioeconomic factors impacting restoration success. Future restoration initiatives can leverage such an understanding to ensure successful implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan O. Hernandez & Damcelle T. Cortes & Byung Bae Park, 2024. "Research Geographical Distribution, Strategies, and Environmental and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Success of Land-Based Restoration: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6381-:d:1442847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Budiharta, Sugeng & Meijaard, Erik & Wells, Jessie A. & Abram, Nicola K. & Wilson, Kerrie A., 2016. "Enhancing feasibility: Incorporating a socio-ecological systems framework into restoration planning," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 83-92.
    2. Shakeel Ahmad Bhat & Alban Kuriqi & Mehraj U. Din Dar & Owais Bhat & Saad Sh. Sammen & Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Owais Shah & Nadhir AI-Ansari & Rawshan Ali & Salim Heddam, 2022. "Application of Biochar for Improving Physical, Chemical, and Hydrological Soil Properties: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Zhenqi Hu & Shuguang Liu & Yuling Gong, 2021. "Evaluation of Soil Quality and Maize Growth in Different Profiles of Reclaimed Land with Coal Gangue Filling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Moisés Méndez-Toribio & Cristina Martínez-Garza & Eliane Ceccon, 2021. "Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Brancalion, Pedro H.S. & Lamb, David & Ceccon, Eliane & Boucher, Doug & Herbohn, John & Strassburg, Bernardo & Edwards, David P., 2017. "Using markets to leverage investment in forest and landscape restoration in the tropics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 103-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Britt Moore, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities for Cover Crop Mediated Soil Water Use Efficiency Enhancements in Temperate Rain-Fed Cropping Systems: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Gao, Yuan & Yu, Lu, 2024. "Understanding the impacts of ecological compensation policies on energy poverty: insights from forest communities in Zhejiang, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Yang Chen & Zhenqi Hu & Pengyu Li & Gensheng Li & Dongzhu Yuan & Jiaxin Guo, 2022. "Assessment and Effect of Mining Subsidence on Farmland in Coal–Crop Overlapped Areas: A Case of Shandong Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Santika, Truly & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Budiharta, Sugeng & Law, Elizabeth A. & Poh, Tun Min & Ancrenaz, Marc & Struebig, Matthew J. & Meijaard, Erik, 2019. "Does oil palm agriculture help alleviate poverty? A multidimensional counterfactual assessment of oil palm development in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 105-117.
    5. Benzeev, Rayna & Wiens, Ashton & Piotto, Daniel & Newton, Peter, 2023. "Property size and forest cover were key determinants of forest restoration in Southern Bahia in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Ota, Liz & Herbohn, John & Gregorio, Nestor & Harrison, Steve, 2020. "Reforestation and smallholder livelihoods in the humid tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2022. "The Economic Situation of Polish Cities in Post-Mining Regions. Long-Term Analysis on the Example of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Bong Soon Lim & Jaewon Seol & A Reum Kim & Ji Hong An & Chi Hong Lim & Chang Seok Lee, 2022. "Succession of the Abandoned Rice Fields Restores the Riparian Forest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Cristina Martínez-Garza & Eliane Ceccon & Moisés Méndez-Toribio, 2022. "Ecological and Social Limitations for Mexican Dry Forest Restoration: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Laudari, Hari Krishna & Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Pariyar, Shiva & Pant, Basant & Bhattarai, Sushma & Kaini, Tika Raj & Karki, Gyanendra & Marahattha, Anisha, 2022. "Sixty-five years of forest restoration in Nepal: Lessons learned and way forward," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Haobin Zhang & Chao Ma & Wenbing Guo & Tingting Li, 2023. "Dynamic Monitoring of Winter Wheat Health in Mining Subsidence Areas by Combined Active and Passive Remote Sensing Technology," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-31, November.
    12. Parron, Lucilia Maria & Villanueva, Anastasio Jose & Glenk, Klaus, 2022. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes amid intensification pressures: The Brazilian case," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Wenjuan Jin & Han Wu & Zhongyi Wei & Chunlan Han & Zhenxing Bian & Xufeng Zhang, 2022. "Are Iron Tailings Suitable for Constructing the Soil Profile Configuration of Reclaimed Farmland? A Soil Quality Evaluation Based on Chronosequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Yeganeh Arablousabet & Arvydas Povilaitis, 2024. "Assessing the Role of Air Nanobubble-Saturated Water in Enhancing Soil Moisture, Nutrient Retention, and Plant Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Sereyrotha Ken & Nophea Sasaki & Tomoe Entani & Hwan Ok Ma & Phalla Thuch & Takuji W. Tsusaka, 2020. "Assessment of the Local Perceptions on the Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Agents of Drivers, and Appropriate Activities in Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Mohammad Ghorbani & Elnaz Amirahmadi & Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner & Petr Konvalina & Marek Kopecký & Jan Moudrý & Kristýna Perná & Yves Theoneste Murindangabo, 2022. "The Impact of Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Properties and Its Effects on Soil Hydrological Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Oimahmad Rahmonov & Jacek Różkowski & Grzegorz Klys, 2022. "The Managing and Restoring of Degraded Land in Post-Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3, February.
    18. Carias, Dora & Page, Tony & Smith, Hilary & Race, Digby & Keenan, Rodney J. & Palmer, Graeme & Baynes, Jack, 2022. "Beyond the ‘Field of Dreams’ model in smallholder forestry: Building viable timber value chains for smallholder tree growers in developing countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Gordillo, Fernando & Elsasser, Peter & Günter, Sven, 2019. "Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined “referendum” – “Consequential open-ended” design," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 28-39.
    20. Valeria Lavagi & Jonathan Kaplan & Georgios Vidalakis & Michelle Ortiz & Michael V. Rodriguez & Madison Amador & Francesca Hopkins & Samantha Ying & Deborah Pagliaccia, 2024. "Recycling Agricultural Waste to Enhance Sustainable Greenhouse Agriculture: Analyzing the Cost-Effectiveness and Agronomic Benefits of Bokashi and Biochar Byproducts as Soil Amendments in Citrus Nurse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6381-:d:1442847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.