IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5973-d1434158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biodegradable Spray Mulch Applications in Greenhouse Agroecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Caputo

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

  • Carlo Di Cesare

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

  • Paola Iovieno

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

  • Barbara Immirzi

    (Institute on Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, 80078 Pozzuoli, NA, Italy)

  • Daniela Baldantoni

    (Department of Chemistry and Biology “Adolfo Zambelli”, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

  • Marija Stipic

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

  • Massimo Zaccardelli

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

  • Accursio Venezia

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 84098 Pontecagnano, SA, Italy)

Abstract

The replacement of synthetic chemical herbicides and traditional plastic sheets is a major challenge of modern horticulture in view of a sustainable weed management. In the first step of this research, we tested the weed control efficacy of two biodegradable polymers, chitosan and galactomannan, applied to the soil surface as spray mulching, with or without the addition of charcoal as a light masking agent, and five essential oils with recognized herbicide properties. The results showed the ability of chitosan in reducing the number and the biomass of annual plants, regardless of the addition of charcoal and essential oils. In the second step, we tested the efficacy of one or three days of false seeding to increase the effectiveness of chitosan against seed germination. The results showed, on average, a reduction of 79% of annual weed presence after three days of false seeding. In both steps, the microbial biomass and three indicators of microbial activity (i.e., basal respiration, FDA hydrolysis activity, and D-glucosamine-induced respiration) were measured in the soil under the experiments in order to investigate possible alterations of soil biological activity induced by the treatments. The results provided no evidence of negative impact of the treatments on soil microbial biomass and activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Caputo & Carlo Di Cesare & Paola Iovieno & Barbara Immirzi & Daniela Baldantoni & Marija Stipic & Massimo Zaccardelli & Accursio Venezia, 2024. "Biodegradable Spray Mulch Applications in Greenhouse Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5973-:d:1434158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5973/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5973/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braunack, Michael V. & Zaja, Adriana & Tam, Kang & Filipović, Lana & Filipović, Vilim & Wang, Yusong & Bristow, Keith L., 2020. "A Sprayable Biodegradable Polymer Membrane (SBPM) technology: Effect of band width and application rate on water conservation and seedling emergence," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Ewa Mackiewicz-Walec & Marzenna Olszewska, 2023. "Biostimulants in the Production of Forage Grasses and Turfgrasses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-33, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmoud Abdel-Sattar & Laila Y. Mostafa & Hail Z. Rihan, 2024. "Enhancing Mango Productivity with Wood Vinegar, Humic Acid, and Seaweed Extract Applications as an Environmentally Friendly Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zong, Rui & Wang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Jinzhu & Li, Wenhao, 2021. "The response of photosynthetic capacity and yield of cotton to various mulching practices under drip irrigation in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Jacek Sosnowski & Milena Truba, 2023. "Effect of Tytanit on Selected Physiological Characteristics, Chemical Composition and Production of Festulolium braunii (K. Richt.) A. Camus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Yufeng Fan & Lingling Li & Fenghui Guo & Xiangyang Hou, 2024. "Tolerance of Forage Grass to Abiotic Stresses by Melatonin Application: Effects, Mechanisms, and Progresses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Ewa Mackiewicz-Walec & Piotr Jarosław Żarczyński & Sławomir Józef Krzebietke & Katarzyna Żarczyńska, 2024. "Smooth Brome ( Bromus inermis L.)—A Versatile Grass: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Donghui He & Keith Bristow & Vilim Filipović & Jialong Lv & Hailong He, 2020. "Microplastics in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Braunack, Michael V. & Filipović, Vilim & Adhikari, Raju & Freischmidt, George & Johnston, Priscilla & Casey, Phil S. & Wang, Yusong & Šimůnek, Jiří & Filipović, Lana & Bristow, Keith L., 2021. "Evaluation of a Sprayable Biodegradable Polymer Membrane (SBPM) Technology for soil water conservation in tomato and watermelon production systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Zhanli Ma & Jian Liu & Yue Wen & Wenhao Li & Yan Zhu & Libing Song & Yunguang Li & Yonghui Liang & Zhenhua Wang, 2024. "Effects of Different Film Types on Cotton Growth and Yield under Drip Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Daniele Caroline Hörz Engel & Daniela Feltrim & Mayara Rodrigues & João Leonardo Corte Baptistella & Paulo Mazzafera, 2024. "Application of Protein Hydrolysate Improved the Productivity of Soybean under Greenhouse Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-10, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5973-:d:1434158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.