IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5724-d1428973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Valuation of the University of Brasília Arboretum and Determinants of Willingness to Pay for the Arboretum

Author

Listed:
  • Manuella de Rezende Alvares

    (Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdade de Tecnologia (FT), Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Humberto Angelo

    (Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdade de Tecnologia (FT), Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Nascimento de Almeida

    (Faculdade UnB de Planaltina (FUP), Universidade de Brasília, Planaltina 73345-010, Brazil)

  • Maristela Franchetti de Paula

    (Departamento de Administração, Campus de Guarapuava, Unicentro, Guarapuava 85040-167, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Anders Brasil

    (Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdade de Tecnologia (FT), Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi

    (Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdade de Tecnologia (FT), Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Despite forest remnants being crucial components of the urban environment, they have been insufficiently studied in terms of their economic value. This study aimed to assess the economic value of the Arboretum at the University of Brasília (UnB) in the Federal District, using the contingent valuation method (CVM) from environmental economics to facilitate effective preservation measures. Questionnaires were randomly distributed to the university population of UnB residing in the Federal District. The findings indicated a willingness among the university community to contribute to the conservation of the Arboretum. Specifically, the study estimated the economic value of the environmental asset, determined the likelihood of willingness to pay (WTP), calculated the average monthly WTP, and analyzed the respondents’ profiles to identify the factors influencing WTP. Among the psychographic, environmental, and socioeconomic variables, only the variables related to environmental segmentation were statistically significant determinants of WTP. The analysis showed that individuals with a greater understanding of ecology were more inclined to express willingness to pay for the Arboretum. Thus, the variable “EK” was identified as an important predictor of environmentally favorable behaviors. The study concluded that the Arboretum’s estimated economic value in 2020 was BRL 57,890,196.00 (with USD 1.00 = BRL 5.25), and the willingness to pay for this environmental asset was estimated at BRL 5.33 per month, consistent with values estimated for other conservation units in Brazil. This willingness to pay makes it possible to generate subsidies for the development of public policies and management strategies to improve and preserve the Arboretum.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuella de Rezende Alvares & Humberto Angelo & Alexandre Nascimento de Almeida & Maristela Franchetti de Paula & Alexandre Anders Brasil & Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi, 2024. "Economic Valuation of the University of Brasília Arboretum and Determinants of Willingness to Pay for the Arboretum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5724-:d:1428973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Michael Hanemann, 1984. "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(3), pages 332-341.
    2. Adams, Cristina & Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo & Ortiz, Ramón Arigoni & Reid, John & Ebersbach Aznar, Cristina & de Almeida Sinisgalli, Paulo Antonio, 2008. "The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 359-370, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ressurreição, Adriana & Gibbons, James & Dentinho, Tomaz Ponce & Kaiser, Michel & Santos, Ricardo S. & Edwards-Jones, Gareth, 2011. "Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 729-739, February.
    2. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Meade, Norman & Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo & Ortiz, Ramon Arigoni & Welsh, Mike & Blanc, Gleiciane Carvalho, 2023. "Estimating environmental and cultural/heritage damages of a tailings dam failure: The case of the Fundão dam in Brazil," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Pandit, Ram & Dhakal, Maheshwar & Polyakov, Maksym, 2015. "Valuing access to protected areas in Nepal: The case of Chitwan National Park," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-12.
    4. López-Mosquera, Natalia & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2011. "The influence of personal values in the economic-use valuation of peri-urban green spaces: An application of the means-end chain theory," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 875-889.
    5. Roberto Ponce & Felipe Vásquez & Alejandra Stehr & Patrick Debels & Carlos Orihuela, 2011. "Estimating the Economic Value of Landscape Losses Due to Flooding by Hydropower Plants in the Chilean Patagonia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(10), pages 2449-2466, August.
    6. Cooper, Joseph C., 2002. "Flexible Functional Form Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Dichotomous Choice Data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 267-279, March.
    7. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    8. Franz Hackl & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2005. "Warm glow, free‐riding and vehicle neutrality in a health‐related contingent valuation study," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 293-306, March.
    9. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Aiew, Wipon & Woodward, Richard T., 2004. "Willingness to Pay for Irradiated Food: A Non Hypothetical Market Experiment," 84th Seminar, February 8-11, 2004, Zeist, The Netherlands 24995, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    11. Olga Lucía Cadena Durán & Andrés Mauricio Gómez Sánchez, 2014. "Racionalidades y prácticas campesinas cafeteras en el departamento del Huila, Colombia," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 8(2), pages 157-184, December.
    12. Clarke, Philip M., 1998. "Cost-benefit analysis and mammographic screening: a travel cost approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 767-787, December.
    13. Philippe Polome & Anne van der Veen & Peter Geurts, 2006. "Is Referendum the Same as Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(2), pages 174-188.
    14. Yoonae Jo, 2001. "Does college education nourish egoism?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 4(2), pages 115-128, September.
    15. Pere Riera & Raúl Brey & Guillermo Gándara, 2008. "Bid design for non-parametric contingent valuation with a single bounded dichotomous choice format," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 186(3), pages 43-60, October.
    16. Sabina Shaikh & Pavel Suchánek & Lili Sun & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2003. "Does Inclusion of Landowners’ Non-Market Values Lower Costs of Creating Carbon Forest Sinks?," Working Papers 2003-03, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    17. Kerstin K Zander & Gillian B Ainsworth & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Stephen T Garnett, 2014. "Threatened Bird Valuation in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    18. Seck, Abdoulaye & Thiam, Djiby Racine, 2022. "Understanding consumer attitudes to and valuation of organic food in Sub-Saharan Africa: A double-bound contingent method applied in Dakar, Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(1), March.
    19. W. Michael Hanemann, 1994. "Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 19-43, Fall.
    20. Adam Finn & Stuart McFadyen & Colin Hoskins, 2003. "Valuing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 27(3), pages 177-192, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5724-:d:1428973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.