IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5719-d1428857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Population Projections within the Framework of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: A Seoul, Korea, Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Youngeun Kang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52725, Republic of Korea)

  • Gyoungju Lee

    (Department of Urban and Transportation Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Despite evidence of the growing importance of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) in addressing climate change globally, there is a gap in research concerning the prediction of regional SSP populations. This study aims to project Seoul’s population from 2020 to 2100 under various SSPs and to interpolate this population through a spatiotemporal approach. Utilizing data from the Korea National Statistical Office and international socioeconomic scenario data, we applied a regression model for predicting population growth. This was supplemented with population projections derived from cohort modeling to enhance accuracy. Population allocation within each grid was determined based on the total floor area of residential buildings. To reflect shifting population demands, we adjusted long-term population trends using observed building completion dates from 2010 to 2020. By 2100, SSP3 is projected to have Seoul’s lowest population at 2,344,075, while SSP5 is expected to have the highest at 5,683,042. We conducted an analysis of grid population characteristics based on SSPs and verified the accuracy of our findings. Our results underscore the importance of refined population estimates for sustainable urban planning, indicating the potential for extending grid population estimates to other regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngeun Kang & Gyoungju Lee, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Population Projections within the Framework of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: A Seoul, Korea, Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5719-:d:1428857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2020. "A cohort projection method to follow deb-structured populations with periodic, synchronized and iteroparous reproduction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 436(C).
    2. Brian C. O’Neill & Timothy R. Carter & Kristie Ebi & Paula A. Harrison & Eric Kemp-Benedict & Kasper Kok & Elmar Kriegler & Benjamin L. Preston & Keywan Riahi & Jana Sillmann & Bas J. Ruijven & Detlef, 2020. "Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(12), pages 1074-1084, December.
    3. Goplerud, Max, 2016. "Crossing the Boundaries: An Implementation of Two Methods for Projecting Data across Boundary Changes," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 121-129, January.
    4. Renshaw, A.E. & Haberman, S., 2006. "A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 556-570, June.
    5. Chen, Y.-H. Henry & Paltsev, Sergey & Reilly, John M. & Morris, Jennifer F. & Babiker, Mustafa H., 2016. "Long-term economic modeling for climate change assessment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 867-883.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plat, Richard, 2009. "Stochastic portfolio specific mortality and the quantification of mortality basis risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 123-132, August.
    2. Winchester, Niven & Reilly, John M., 2020. "The economic and emissions benefits of engineered wood products in a low-carbon future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Dorota Toczydlowska & Gareth W. Peters & Man Chung Fung & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2017. "Stochastic Period and Cohort Effect State-Space Mortality Models Incorporating Demographic Factors via Probabilistic Robust Principal Components," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-77, July.
    4. Biavaschi, Costanza & Facchini, Giovanni, 2020. "Immigrant Franchise and Immigration Policy: Evidence from the Progressive Era," IZA Discussion Papers 13195, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Huang, H. & Milevsky, M.A. & Salisbury, T.S., 2017. "Retirement spending and biological age," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 58-76.
    6. Chen, Fen-Ying & Yang, Sharon S. & Huang, Hong-Chih, 2022. "Modeling pandemic mortality risk and its application to mortality-linked security pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 341-363.
    7. Karim Barigou & Stéphane Loisel & Yahia Salhi, 2020. "Parsimonious Predictive Mortality Modeling by Regularization and Cross-Validation with and without Covid-Type Effect," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Plat, Richard, 2011. "One-year Value-at-Risk for longevity and mortality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 462-470.
    9. Jane Spiteri, 2023. "Approaches to Foster Young Children’s Engagement with Climate Action: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Yang, Sharon S. & Wang, Chou-Wen, 2013. "Pricing and securitization of multi-country longevity risk with mortality dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 157-169.
    11. Katja Hanewald & Thomas Post & Helmut Gründl, 2011. "Stochastic Mortality, Macroeconomic Risks and Life Insurer Solvency," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 36(3), pages 458-475, July.
    12. Li, Johnny Siu-Hang, 2010. "Pricing longevity risk with the parametric bootstrap: A maximum entropy approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 176-186, October.
    13. Katrien Antonio & Anastasios Bardoutsos & Wilbert Ouburg, 2015. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality projections with multiple populations," Working Papers Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven 485564, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven.
    14. Blake, David & El Karoui, Nicole & Loisel, Stéphane & MacMinn, Richard, 2018. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2015–16 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 157-173.
    15. Otto, Christian & Willner, Sven Norman & Wenz, Leonie & Frieler, Katja & Levermann, Anders, 2017. "Modeling loss-propagation in the global supply network: The dynamic agent-based model acclimate," OSF Preprints 7yyhd, Center for Open Science.
    16. Anastasia Novokreshchenova, 2016. "Predicting Human Mortality: Quantitative Evaluation of Four Stochastic Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-28, December.
    17. D’Amato, Valeria & Di Lorenzo, Emilia & Haberman, Steven & Sagoo, Pretty & Sibillo, Marilena, 2018. "De-risking strategy: Longevity spread buy-in," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 124-136.
    18. Paltsev, Sergey & Morris, Jennifer & Kheshgi, Haroon & Herzog, Howard, 2021. "Hard-to-Abate Sectors: The role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    19. D’Amato, Valeria & Haberman, Steven & Piscopo, Gabriella & Russolillo, Maria, 2012. "Modelling dependent data for longevity projections," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 694-701.
    20. Paola Biffi & Gian Clemente, 2014. "Selecting stochastic mortality models for the Italian population," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 37(2), pages 255-286, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5719-:d:1428857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.