IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v3y2023i2d10.1007_s43615-022-00205-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Wielopolski

    (ÆVOLUTION® Circular Materials Innovation)

  • Willem Bulthuis

    (Corporate Ventures Advisory, Sustainabill GmbH)

Abstract

Despite the recognition and a growing interest in sustainable innovation in the construction industry, the speed at which such innovations are being deployed into practical and scalable solutions that reduce the environmental impact of our built world is far too slow. Considering the complex structure of the industry, which involves a multidisciplinary mix of stakeholders from various backgrounds, adopting the systems thinking approach of circular economy (CE) is crucial to deploy effective and holistic solutions that can be scaled exponentially. Hence, addressing the challenges resulting from the complexity and multidisciplinary constitution of the industry for the deployment of sustainable innovations necessitates a deepening of collaboration between stakeholders with highly diverse cultures, ways of working, business models, and priorities. Within this communication, it is being discussed how a holistic system-thinking approach as constituted by the CE paradigm can be practically deployed in the typically traditional construction industry. The proposed approach, called the Better Building Initiative, centers around establishing an ecosystem for circular innovation in building and construction that involves intrinsically motivated stakeholders from all relevant disciplines and interests. Based on the action-oriented Better Building Manifesto, it is proposed how to unify the three sustainable innovation areas: materials, design, and process in one holistic innovation approach and develop an innovation platform that accelerates circular innovation in the building and construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Wielopolski & Willem Bulthuis, 2023. "The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 719-733, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:3:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-022-00205-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-022-00205-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-022-00205-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-022-00205-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Why Do Companies Pursue Collaborative Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. de Jesus, Ana & Mendonça, Sandro, 2018. "Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 75-89.
    3. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Ng, S. Thomas & Antwi-Afari, Prince & Amor, Ben, 2020. "Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Benjamin Sanchez & Carl Haas, 2018. "Capital project planning for a circular economy," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 303-312, June.
    6. Powell, E. Erin & Hamann, Ralph & Bitzer, Verena & Baker, Ted, 2018. "Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 623-642.
    7. Deborah Sumter & Jotte de Koning & Conny Bakker & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "Circular Economy Competencies for Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. G. E. Velter & V. Bitzer & N. M. P. Bocken, 2022. "A Boundary Tool for Multi-stakeholder Sustainable Business Model Innovation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 401-431, June.
    2. Anja Eisenreich & Johann Füller & Martin Stuchtey, 2021. "Open Circular Innovation: How Companies Can Develop Circular Innovations in Collaboration with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Sultan Çetin & Catherine De Wolf & Nancy Bocken, 2021. "Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    4. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali & Roger Strange, 2022. "Proactive and reactive views in the transition towards circular business models. A grounded study in the plastic packaging industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1073-1102, September.
    6. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Fazal Ur Rehman & Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & Adel Ghaleb Haddad & Ehab Abdullatif Qahwash & M. Sadiq Sohail, 2023. "Exploring the Reverse Relationship between Circular Economy Innovation and Digital Sustainability—The Dual Mediation of Government Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Nathalia Suchek & Mário Franco, 2024. "Inter-organisational Cooperation Oriented Towards Sustainability Involving SMEs: a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1952-1972, March.
    9. Ipek Kazancoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Emel Yarimoglu & Aysun Kahraman, 2020. "A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1477-1492, September.
    10. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Cuevas-Romo, Ana & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Díaz-Acevedo, Natalie & Albores, Pavel & Despoudi, Stella & Malesios, Chrisovalantis & Dey, Prasanta, 2022. "The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Roope Husgafvel & Daishi Sakaguchi, 2021. "Circular Economy Development in the Construction Sector in Japan," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Marie Briguglio & Leandro J. Llorente-González & Christopher Meilak & Ángeles Pereira & Jonathan Spiteri & Xavier Vence, 2021. "Born or Grown: Enablers and Barriers to Circular Business in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Daniela Rybarova & Katarina Remenova & Maria Kmety Bartekova & Helena Majduchova, 2023. "Analysis of the Attitudes of Central European Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises towards Adaptation to the Low-Carbon Economy and Its Implementation Barriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Simone Wurster & Philipp Heß & Michael Nauruschat & Malte Jütting, 2020. "Sustainable Circular Mobility: User-Integrated Innovation and Specifics of Electric Vehicle Owners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Jelle Joustra & Conny Bakker & Riel Bessai & Ruud Balkenende, 2022. "Circular Composites by Design: Testing a Design Method in Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov & Inna Lazanyuk & Svetlana Revinova, 2021. "Barriers and Drivers for Circular Economy 2.0 on the Firm Level: Russian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Deborah Sumter & Jotte de Koning & Conny Bakker & Ruud Balkenende, 2021. "Key Competencies for Design in a Circular Economy: Exploring Gaps in Design Knowledge and Skills for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:3:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-022-00205-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.