IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4945-d1411665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Different Tourism Models on Rural Ecosystem Service Value in Ziquejie Terraces

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Shi

    (School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Techonology, Loudi 417000, China)

  • Ming Mo

    (School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Yimin Xie

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Techonology, Loudi 417000, China)

  • Qianying Liao

    (School of Law and Business, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang 422000, China)

Abstract

Villages are important components of agricultural heritage sites, and their tourism models significantly impact ecosystem service value (ESV). This study takes Zhenglong Village (culture and tourism integration), Ziquejie Village (farmstay type), and Jizhai Village (sightseeing type) with different tourism models in the Ziquejie Terraces heritage site as the research objects. Firstly, a single dynamic land use model and a land use transfer matrix were used to reveal rural land use changes driven by three different tourism models. Secondly, changes in ESV in the three villages were assessed with a valuation model. Finally, the welfare per unit area of villagers obtained from ecosystem services (ESs) was calculated. The results showed that: (1) From 2006 to 2022, the built-up area in the three villages gradually increased, primarily converting from farmland. Zhenglong Village experienced the smallest degree of change in both farmland and built-up areas. (2) The total ESV in Zhenglong Village increased by 0.35 times, the highest among the three villages. (3) Zhenglong Village saw the largest increase in welfare per unit area of villagers, from 82,551 CNY in 2006 to 111,785 CNY in 2022. Therefore, adopting a culture and tourism integration model in this heritage site is most conducive to conserving and enhancing the rural ESV, improving villagers’ welfare, and promoting the sustainable development of villages and heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Shi & Ming Mo & Yimin Xie & Qianying Liao, 2024. "Impacts of Different Tourism Models on Rural Ecosystem Service Value in Ziquejie Terraces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4945-:d:1411665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guangchao Li & Wei Chen & Xuepeng Zhang & Zhen Yang & Pengshuai Bi & Zhe Wang, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Values in the Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone and the Synergistic Impact of Its Driving Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Yuan Yuan & Gangchun Xu & Nannan Shen & Zhijuan Nie & Hongxia Li & Lin Zhang & Yunchong Gong & Yanhui He & Xiaofei Ma & Hongyan Zhang & Jian Zhu & Jinrong Duan & Pao Xu, 2022. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development of Hani Terraces: A Rice–Fish–Duck Integrated Farming Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Bianca Tilliger & Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos & Jesus Victor Bustamante & Josef Settele, 2015. "Disentangling Values in the Interrelations between Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Conservation—A Case Study of the Ifugao Rice Terraces in the Philippines," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Bin Wang & Chunguang Hu & Jianxiong Li, 2022. "Coupling and Coordination Relationship between the Tourism Economy and Ecosystem Service Value in Southern Jiangsu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    2. Víctor García-Díez & Marina García-Llorente & José A. González, 2020. "Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Madrid: Insights for Landscape Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Shamik Chakraborty & Ram Avtar & Raveena Raj & Huynh Vuong Thu Minh, 2019. "Village Level Provisioning Ecosystem Services and Their Values to Local Communities in the Peri-Urban Areas of Manila, The Philippines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Enrico Pomatto & Paola Gullino & Silvia Novelli & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2023. "Landscape Strategies for Terraced Landscapes in the European Alpine Region Using a Mixed-Method Analysis Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Salvatore Praticò & Francesco Solano & Salvatore Di Fazio & Giuseppe Modica, 2022. "A Multitemporal Fragmentation-Based Approach for a Dynamics Analysis of Agricultural Terraced Systems: The Case Study of Costa Viola Landscape (Southern Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Xiaopiao Yang & Yuluan Zhao & Jia Zhao & Chao Shi & Bailu Deng, 2022. "Tourists’ Perceived Attitudes toward the Famous Terraced Agricultural Cultural Heritage Landscape in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Knoke, Thomas & Elsasser, Peter & Kindu, Mengistie, 2024. "Considering the land-cover elasticity of ecosystem service value coefficients improves assessments of large land-use changes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Benjamin Burkhard & Stefan Hotes & Hubert Wiggering, 2016. "Agro(Eco)System Services—Supply and Demand from Fields to Society," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-4, April.
    9. Yuhan Wang & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang & Yongji Xue, 2023. "Mountainous Areas: Alleviating the Shortage of Cultivated Land Caused by Changing Dietary Structure in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Lei Yang & Fenglian Liu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Value of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Qian Wang & Xiaoqi Yang & Xinyu Liu & Katsunori Furuya, 2024. "Rice Terrace Experience in Japan: An Ode to the Beauty of Seasonality and Nostalgia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Qikang Zhong & Zhe Li & Yujing He, 2023. "Coupling Evaluation and Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Land Ecosystem Services and Economic–Social Development in a City Group: The Case Study of the Chengdu–Chongqing City Group," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Yuan Yuan & Gangchun Xu & Nannan Shen & Zhijuan Nie & Hongxia Li & Lin Zhang & Yunchong Gong & Yanhui He & Xiaofei Ma & Hongyan Zhang & Jian Zhu & Jinrong Duan & Pao Xu, 2022. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development of Hani Terraces: A Rice–Fish–Duck Integrated Farming Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Jingyi Guo & Ling Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variations in Gross Ecosystem Product and Its Relationship with Economic Growth in Ecologically Vulnerable Watershed Areas: A Case Study of Yongding River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Yan Zhang & Xiaoyong Liao & Dongqi Sun, 2024. "A Coupled InVEST-PLUS Model for the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Multi-Scenario Prediction Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4945-:d:1411665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.