IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4914-d1411083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Max–Min Fairness-Inspired Approach to Enhance the Performance of Multimodal Transportation Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Osamah Y. Moshebah

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
    School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

  • Samuel Rodríguez-González

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota 111711, Colombia)

  • Andrés D. González

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)

Abstract

Disruptions in multimodal transportation networks can lead to significant damage and loss, affecting not only the networks’ efficiency but also their sustainability. Given the size, dynamics, and complex nature of these networks, it is essential to understand and enhance their resilience against disruptions. This not only ensures their functionality and performance but also supports sustainable development by maintaining equitable service across various communities and economic sectors. Therefore, developing efficient techniques to increase the robustness and resilience of transportation networks is crucial for both operational success and sustainability. This research introduces a multicriteria mixed integer linear programming (MCMILP) model aimed at enhancing the resilience and performance of multimodal–multi-commodity transportation networks. By ensuring effective distribution of commodities, alongside a cost-efficient distribution strategy in the wake of disruptive events, our model contributes significantly to sustainable transportation practices. The proposed MCMILP model demonstrates that integrating equality considerations while seeking a cost-efficient distribution strategy significantly mitigates the impact of disruptions, thereby bolstering the resilience of multimodal transportation networks. To illustrate the capabilities of the proposed modeling approach, we present a case study based on the multimodal transportation network in Colombia. The results show a significant improvement in the number of nodes that satisfy their demand requirements with respect to other approaches based on reducing total unsatisfied demand and transportation costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Osamah Y. Moshebah & Samuel Rodríguez-González & Andrés D. González, 2024. "A Max–Min Fairness-Inspired Approach to Enhance the Performance of Multimodal Transportation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-33, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4914-:d:1411083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    2. Ni, Ni & Howell, Brendan J. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2018. "Modeling the impact of unmet demand in supply chain resiliency planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    4. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Snoeck, André & Udenio, Maximiliano & Fransoo, Jan C., 2019. "A stochastic program to evaluate disruption mitigation investments in the supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 516-530.
    2. Sushil R. Poudel & Md Abdul Quddus & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Linkan Bian & Reuben F. Burch V, 2019. "Managing congestion in a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 739-781, February.
    3. Xing, Xinjie & Song, Dongping & Qiu, Chengfeng & Drake, Paul R. & Zhan, Yuanzhu, 2023. "Joint tank container demurrage policy and flow optimisation using a progressive hedging algorithm with expanded time-space network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 663-679.
    4. Goldbeck, Nils & Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Ochieng, Washington, 2020. "Optimal supply chain resilience with consideration of failure propagation and repair logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Marina Ivanova, 2017. "Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6158-6174, October.
    6. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    7. Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Jin, 2014. "Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 122-145.
    8. Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni, 2017. "Managing congestion in supply chains via dynamic freight routing: An application in the biomass supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 54-76.
    9. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    11. Lin, Cheng-Chang & Wu, Yi-Chen, 2013. "Optimal pricing for build-to-order supply chain design under price-dependent stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-49.
    12. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    13. Pasura Aungkulanon & Walailak Atthirawong & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon & Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch, 2024. "Navigating Supply Chain Resilience: A Hybrid Approach to Agri-Food Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-42, May.
    14. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.
    15. Dan Liu & Zhenghong Deng & Qipeng Sun & Yong Wang & Yinhai Wang, 2019. "Design and Freight Corridor-Fleet Size Choice in Collaborative Intermodal Transportation Network Considering Economies of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2015. "Risk analysis in port competition for containerized imports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 743-753.
    18. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    19. Leonardo de Assis Santos & Leonardo Marques, 2022. "Big data analytics for supply chain risk management: research opportunities at process crossroads," Post-Print hal-03766121, HAL.
    20. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2009. "Multimarket Facility Network Design with Offshoring Applications," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 90-108, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4914-:d:1411083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.