IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4882-d1410484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Participatory Process for Soil Fertility: A Case Study in an Urban Area of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Criscuolo

    (CNR IGG—Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Gloria Bordogna

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Lara Barbara

    (FINO—Northwestern Italian Philosophy Consortium, 10124 Turin, Italy)

  • Alice Benessia

    (Fondazione Pianpicollo Selvatico ETS, 12070 Levice, Italy)

  • Caterina Bergami

    (CNR ISMAR—Institute of Marine Sciences, National Research Council, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Elisa Calastri

    (DISAA—Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Valentina Capocefalo

    (Department of Cultural and Environmental Heritage, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Andrea Caretto

    (Department of Philosophy and Educational Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy)

  • Chiara Cavallo

    (CREA—Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Research Centre, 18038 Sanremo, Italy)

  • Anwesha Chakraborty

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy)

  • Christian Colella

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Laura Colucci-Gray

    (Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK)

  • Stefano Crosetto

    (SEAcoop STP, Corso Palestro 9, 10122 Turin, Italy)

  • Amelia De Lazzari

    (CNR ISMAR—Institute of Marine Sciences, National Research Council, 30122 Venice, Italy)

  • Sara Di Lonardo

    (CNR-IRET—Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Research Council, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Enrico Ercole

    (SEAcoop STP, Corso Palestro 9, 10122 Turin, Italy)

  • Rita Giuffredi

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Francesca Grasso

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Turin, 10149 Turin, Italy)

  • Valentina Grasso

    (CNR IBE—Institute for the BioEconomy, National Research Council, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy)

  • Lucia Laurenza

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Salvatore Mallardo

    (CNR IPCB—Institute for Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Francesco Nigro

    (Group of Agroecology, Center of Plant Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Alessandro Oggioni

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Fabio Piccolin

    (ENEA—S. Teresa Marine Environment Research Center, 19036 La Spezia, Italy)

  • Flavia Pizzi

    (CNR IBBA—Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Beatrice Serini

    (Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Raffaella Spagna

    (Fondazione Pianpicollo Selvatico ETS, 12070 Levice, Italy)

  • Giorgio A. Ubbiali

    (HUME Doctoral School, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Pompilio Vergine

    (CNR IRSA—Water Research Institute, National Research Council, 70132 Bari, Italy)

  • Alba L’Astorina

    (CNR IREA—Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council, 20133 Milan, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Approaches that are transdisciplinary and participatory can help to address complex socio-ecological issues by integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives while taking into account the different needs and experiences of community members and other stakeholders. Despite this promise, such approaches are rarely applied within the scientific community, as researchers and public actors often lack the training, practice and reference cases required to handle the working relationships and translations of terminology, ideas and values across multiple bodies of knowledge. A case study described in this manuscript depicts a group of researchers, artists and citizens consciously engaged in the construction of a transdisciplinary process as part of a 40-day ‘citizen science’ experiment focussed on assessing soil fertility in the urban area of Milan, Italy. The group drew from recognised scientific approaches, applied agronomic methodologies, artistic practices and technological tools, integrating them into a hybrid process of collective and participatory inquiry. As a quantitative outcome of the experiment, a dataset of bio-chemical parameters was generated, which was enriched by agronomic interpretations but also by artistic and reflective materials. Importantly, the process developed transdisciplinary and participatory skills, as it created a potentially replicable procedure of engagement, analysis and presentation for use in other citizen science settings. This article presents the context, the multiple objectives of the research and the applied approach and its timeline. Described in detail are the process of designing and conducting the experiment by involving an extended research community—including both junior and senior researchers—in progressive steps. Quantitative and qualitative results are provided. The findings are meant to contribute case material and methods to inform the advancement of transdisciplinary research approaches within the scientific community as well as examples of ways to transcend the boundaries of science to include artists and community stakeholders. The aspiration is to inform and inspire concrete application of transdisciplinary and participatory methods in concert to address complex socio-environmental challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Criscuolo & Gloria Bordogna & Lara Barbara & Alice Benessia & Caterina Bergami & Elisa Calastri & Valentina Capocefalo & Andrea Caretto & Chiara Cavallo & Anwesha Chakraborty & Christian Colella, 2024. "Developing a Participatory Process for Soil Fertility: A Case Study in an Urban Area of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4882-:d:1410484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max-Neef, Manfred A., 2005. "Foundations of transdisciplinarity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 5-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Stock & Rob J.F. Burton, 2011. "Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    3. Luks, Fred & Siebenhuner, Bernd, 2007. "Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 418-426, August.
    4. Stéphanie Camaréna, 2021. "Engaging with Artificial Intelligence (AI) with a Bottom-Up Approach for the Purpose of Sustainability: Victorian Farmers Market Association, Melbourne Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Vandermeulen, V. & Van Huylenbroeck, G., 2008. "Designing trans-disciplinary research to support policy formulation for sustainable agricultural development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 352-361, October.
    6. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    7. Kouam, Jean & Asongu, Simplice, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 114061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Saeideh Sayari, 2020. "Sin in the cosmological function of the mystical viewpoint of Ibn ‘Arabi: An interdisciplinary approach," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 6(2), pages 53-60.
    9. Lundgren, Jakob, 2022. "Unity through disunity: Strengths, values, and tensions in the disciplinary discourse of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Cyrille Rigolot, 2020. "Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: complementarities and creative tensions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, December.
    11. Ansell, Christopher K. & Bartenberger, Martin, 2016. "Varieties of experimentalism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 64-73.
    12. Lezlie Morinière, 2012. "Environmentally Influenced Urbanisation: Footprints Bound for Town?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(2), pages 435-450, February.
    13. Anosh Nadeem Butt & Branka Dimitrijević, 2022. "Multidisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Collaboration in Nature-Based Design of Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Louis Celliers & Dianne Scott & Mvuselelo Ngcoya & Susan Taljaard, 2021. "Negotiation of knowledge for coastal management? Reflections from a transdisciplinary experiment in South Africa," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Carbajo, Ruth & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Renewable energy research and technologies through responsible research and innovation looking glass: Reflexions, theoretical approaches and contemporary discourses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 792-808.
    16. Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "Organizing and better understanding transdisciplinarity in the context of artificial intelligence expansion: a crucial role for the new alliance between economics and engineering," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 615-620, December.
    17. Aeberhard, Andrea & Rist, Stephan, 2009. "Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1171-1181, February.
    18. Brennan, Michael & Rondón-Sulbarán, Janeet, 2019. "Transdisciplinary research: Exploring impact, knowledge and quality in the early stages of a sustainable development project," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-491.
    19. Mann, Carsten & Loft, Lasse & Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2015. "Governance of Ecosystem Services: Lessons learned for sustainable institutions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 275-281.
    20. Marcel Bursztyn, 2008. "Sustainability Science and the University: Towards Interdisciplinarity," CID Working Papers 24, Center for International Development at Harvard University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4882-:d:1410484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.