IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4624-d1404819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Higher-Educated Employees More Responsible? A Study about Employee Quality and Corporate Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Fang

    (Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Kun Li

    (Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

This paper explores how employee quality affects companies’ actions in terms of environmental protection and sustainable development. We use the proportions of the workforce with three education levels as proxies for employee quality and examine their respective impacts on three dimensions of corporate environmental sustainability: (1) reporting, (2) quality and standardization, and (3) attention and initiative. We investigate over 1300 firms listed in Chinese stock markets from 2006, the year when Chinese firms first released environmental issues and the Chinese regulatory divisions first announced a guideline, to 2021. The results indicate the following: (a) employee quality is positively associated with the reporting of corporate environmental sustainability, (b) companies with more educated employees are more likely to provide environmental and sustainable information with high standards and quality, and (c) companies with more educated employees are more likely to release environmental and sustainable information in solo reports as a reflection of the corporate attention on and initiative in environmental sustainability. Moreover, we find that employees at higher education levels have a stronger impact on corporate environmental sustainability. This paper contributes to the literature on human capital and environmental management.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Fang & Kun Li, 2024. "Are Higher-Educated Employees More Responsible? A Study about Employee Quality and Corporate Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4624-:d:1404819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurence Vigneau & Michael Humphreys & Jeremy Moon, 2015. "How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 469-486, October.
    2. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    3. Carl‐Johan Hedberg & Fredrik von Malmborg, 2003. "The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 153-164, September.
    4. Jin, Yige & Dong, Nanyan & Tian, Gaoliang & Zhang, Junrui, 2023. "Wisdom of the masses: Employee education and corporate risk taking," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Halkos, George & Nomikos, Stylianos, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-117.
    6. Rita Yi Man Li & Beiqi Tang & Kwong Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Construction Safety Knowledge Sharing: A Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling and A Feedforward Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Muzhi Wang & Weichen Yan, 2022. "Brain Gain: The Effect of Employee Quality on Corporate Social Responsibility," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(4), pages 679-713, December.
    8. Fizzah Malik & Fangjun Wang & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Amir Ikram & Shahid Ali, 2020. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Related to CEO Attributes: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    9. Linda O’Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 745-758, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Kun & Li, Xiaokai, 2024. "How does Employee Education Affect Employer's Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Zanellato Gianluca, 2021. "Quality of Information Disclosed in Integrated Reports, in the Extracting Sector: Insights from Europe," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2018. "The Use And Determinants Of Training And Development For Creativity And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Daewook Kim & Myung-Il Choi, 2013. "A Comparison of Young Publics’ Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Multinational Corporations in the United States and South Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 105-118, March.
    5. Henry M. H. Chan & Vincent W. S. Cho, 2022. "An Empirical Study: The Impact of Collaborative Communications on New Product Creativity That Contributes to New Product Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Oubrich, Mourad & Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Benhayoun, Lamiae & Solberg Söilen, Klaus & Abdulkader, Bisan, 2021. "Impacts of leadership style, organizational design and HRM practices on knowledge hiding: The indirect roles of organizational justice and competitive work environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 488-499.
    7. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    9. Ziegele, Daniel & Kurtze, Hannah & Zerfaß, Ansgar, 2021. "From reality to virtuality. Moving stakeholder dialogues from face-to-face to online formats," Communication Insights 12, Academic Society for Management & Communication – An initiative of the Günter Thiele Foundation, Leipzig.
    10. Onyeka Osuji, 2011. "Fluidity of Regulation-CSR Nexus: The Multinational Corporate Corruption Example," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 31-57, September.
    11. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Frank Crowley & Jane Bourke, 2017. "The Influence Of Human Resource Management Systems On Innovation: Evidence From Irish Manufacturing And Service Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-28, January.
    13. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    14. Richard Stiebal, 2023. "Use of SASB standards for ESG reporting in Europe: Empirical analysis [Empirická analýza použití SASB standardů pro ESG reporting v Evropě]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 5-23.
    15. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    16. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Marcus Adam, 2018. "The Role of Human Resource Management (HRM) for the Implementation of Sustainable Product-Service Systems (PSS)—An Analysis of Fashion Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Haneda, Shoko & Ito, Keiko, 2018. "Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 194-208.
    19. Nadine Székely & Jan vom Brocke, 2017. "What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, April.
    20. Wang, Liwen & Zhao, Jane Zheng & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2018. "How do incentives motivate absorptive capacity development? The mediating role of employee learning and relational contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 226-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4624-:d:1404819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.