IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p44-d1303619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Location Problem of Medical Drone Vertiports for Emergency Cardiac Arrest Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Xinhui Ren

    (School of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Ruibo Li

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

Abstract

The implementation of medical drones can quickly and efficiently expand the coverage range of an area, allowing for a faster response to incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and improving the subsequent survival rate of such incidences, while promoting sustainable health development goals under the configuration standards for automatic external defibrillators in China. In response to the problem of the selection of locations for medical drone vertiports (for take-off and landing) that are equipped with automatic external defibrillation facilities, a survival function was introduced to establish a model for site selection, with the primary optimization objective of maximizing the average survival rate of patients and taking the operating costs of a system into account. At the same time, considering the constraints of drone phase operation time, energy consumption, coverage range, etc., a medical drone vertiport site selection model was established for emergency cardiac arrest needs. An improved immune algorithm was applied to the model’s calculations and the analysis of the results, using the Jinnan District in Tianjin as an example. The results show that the proposed model and algorithm are feasible and applicable. The Jinnan District in the city of Tianjin requires a total of 24 medical drone vertiports in order to achieve full coverage of an area under the “golden 4-minute” rescue time. When the average survival rate of patients is 0.9, the operation results are deemed optimal, and the average survival rate of patients is 64.06%. Compared to ground ambulances currently used in hospitals, the implementation of medical drones could significantly shorten response time, improve the average survival rate of patients by 41.96%, and effectively improve the existing low survival rate and the accessibility of medical services. The results of this study can provide decision-making support for the planning of automatic external defibrillators in public places and the construction of sustainable and efficient emergency medical service systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinhui Ren & Ruibo Li, 2023. "The Location Problem of Medical Drone Vertiports for Emergency Cardiac Arrest Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:44-:d:1303619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Wankmüller & Christian Truden & Christopher Korzen & Philipp Hungerländer & Ewald Kolesnik & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Optimal allocation of defibrillator drones in mountainous regions," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(3), pages 785-814, September.
    2. Mahmoud Golabi & Seyed Mahdi Shavarani & Gokhan Izbirak, 2017. "An edge-based stochastic facility location problem in UAV-supported humanitarian relief logistics: a case study of Tehran earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1545-1565, July.
    3. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson & Güneş Erdoğan, 2008. "Ambulance location for maximum survival," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 42-58, February.
    4. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele & Ayamga, Matthew, 2021. "Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dukkanci, Okan & Campbell, James F. & Kara, Bahar Y., 2024. "Facility location decisions for drone delivery: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 397-418.
    2. Kunovjanek, Maximilian & Wankmüller, Christian, 2021. "Containing the COVID-19 pandemic with drones - Feasibility of a drone enabled back-up transport system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-152.
    3. Niki Matinrad & Melanie Reuter-Oppermann, 2022. "A review on initiatives for the management of daily medical emergencies prior to the arrival of emergency medical services," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 251-302, March.
    4. Malihe Niksirat & Mohsen Saffarian & Javad Tayyebi & Adrian Marius Deaconu & Delia Elena Spridon, 2024. "Fuzzy Multi-Objective, Multi-Period Integrated Routing–Scheduling Problem to Distribute Relief to Disaster Areas: A Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Sabino, Hullysses & Almeida, Rodrigo V.S. & Moraes, Lucas Baptista de & Silva, Walber Paschoal da & Guerra, Raphael & Malcher, Carlos & Passos, Diego & Passos, Fernanda G.O., 2022. "A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Mehari Beyene Teshome & Faisal Rasool & Guido Orzes, 2024. "Mountain Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Akdogan, M. Altan & Bayındır, Z. Pelin & Iyigun, Cem, 2023. "An analysis of ambulance location problem from an equity perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J. & Heldeweg, Michiel A., 2022. "Safety and privacy regulations for unmanned aerial vehicles: A multiple comparative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Sham, Rohana & Chong, Han Xi & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene & Bibi Tkm Thangal, Thahira & Abdamia, Noranita binti, 2023. "Switching up the delivery game: Understanding switching intention to retail drone delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Suriyaphong Nilsang & Chumpol Yuangyai & Chen-Yang Cheng & Udom Janjarassuk, 2019. "Locating an ambulance base by using social media: a case study in Bangkok," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 497-516, December.
    12. Yoon, Soovin & Albert, Laura A., 2021. "Dynamic dispatch policies for emergency response with multiple types of vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Dukkanci, Okan & Koberstein, Achim & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "Drones for relief logistics under uncertainty after an earthquake," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 117-132.
    14. Nilay Noyan, 2010. "Alternate risk measures for emergency medical service system design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 559-589, December.
    15. İbrahim Miraç Eligüzel & Eren Özceylan & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2023. "Location-allocation analysis of humanitarian distribution plans: a case of United Nations Humanitarian Response Depots," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 825-854, May.
    16. Shiva Ilkhanizadeh & Mahmoud Golabi & Siamand Hesami & Husam Rjoub, 2020. "The Potential Use of Drones for Tourism in Crises: A Facility Location Analysis Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Béla Vizvári & Mahmoud Golabi & Arman Nedjati & Ferhat Gümüşbuğa & Gokhan Izbirak, 2019. "Top-down approach to design the relief system in a metropolitan city using UAV technology, part I: the first 48 h," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 571-597, October.
    18. Ľudmila Jánošíková & Marek Kvet & Peter Jankovič & Lýdia Gábrišová, 2019. "An optimization and simulation approach to emergency stations relocation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 737-758, September.
    19. Jenkins, Phillip R. & Lunday, Brian J. & Robbins, Matthew J., 2020. "Robust, multi-objective optimization for the military medical evacuation location-allocation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Wang, Jianxin & Lim, Ming K. & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Wang, XiaoFeng, 2020. "An intelligent logistics service system for enhancing dispatching operations in an IoT environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:44-:d:1303619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.