IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p298-d1309461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Medical Waste Management Using an Intuitionistic Fuzzy-Based Decision Support System

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Kokkinos

    (Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Evangelia Lakioti

    (School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 42100 Larissa, Greece)

  • Konstantinos Moustakas

    (School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Constantinos Tsanaktsidis

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Vayos Karayannis

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

The growing urban population and increased use of healthcare services have brought significant attention to the safe and sustainable management of medical waste. Selecting the proper technology in medical waste management (MWM) represents one of the most critical challenges for decision-makers to ensure public health. In order to evaluate and choose the best MWM methodology, the current research provides a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) strategy for a variety of social stakeholders, to compute criteria weights, decision-making weights, and alternative ranking algorithms. The suggested structure addresses uncertain assessments of alternatives by extending weighting and ranking methods to acquire the decision-making weight and rank the MWM alternatives based on uncertain conditions. It also uses ‘intuitionistic fuzzy’ linguistic variables to indicate criteria weights. To assess all the factors pertaining to the sustainability of MWM actions, this study suggests the creation of a decision support system (DSS). Our DSS is built upon a novel strategy that utilizes a collection of MCDM models that are grounded on contemporary intuitionistic fuzzy logic methodologies. Alternative scenarios have been assessed for the instance of Greece, after specialists in the healthcare management field imposed 17 criteria and sub-criteria. The IF-MCDM methodologies used were the Intuitionistic Fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and CORPAS. The alternative scenarios ranged from the prioritizing of safety laws and regulations to public acceptance and awareness, with the handling of hazardous risks and transportation playing a crucial part in the process. All ensemble methods produced the same ranking of the alternatives, demonstrating that safety and risk avoidance is the most significant scenario for sustainable urban development and public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Kokkinos & Evangelia Lakioti & Konstantinos Moustakas & Constantinos Tsanaktsidis & Vayos Karayannis, 2023. "Sustainable Medical Waste Management Using an Intuitionistic Fuzzy-Based Decision Support System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:298-:d:1309461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuan Luo & Wenzhu Liao, 2022. "Collaborative Reverse Logistics Network for Infectious Medical Waste Management during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Khadija Al-Omran & Asma Abahussain & Ezzat Khan, 2023. "Integrated Environmental Assessment of Medical Waste Management in the Kingdom of Bahrain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Poornima A. Jayasinghe & Hamoun Jalilzadeh & Patrick Hettiaratchi, 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Waste Infrastructure: Lessons Learned and Opportunities for a Sustainable Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Sang M. Lee & DonHee Lee, 2022. "Effective Medical Waste Management for Sustainable Green Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Wuyong Qian & Zhou-Jing Wang & Kevin W. Li, 2016. "Medical Waste Disposal Method Selection Based on a Hierarchical Decision Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Ferreira & Ana L. Ramos & José V. Ferreira & Luís P. Ferreira, 2024. "Simulation of Hospital Waste Supply Chain in the Context of Industry 4.0—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Lan Zhu & Tao Ding & Zhuofan Liu, 2024. "Reverse Logistics Network Design for Medical Waste Disposal under the Scenario of Uncertain Proposal Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Alessio Conti & Elena Viottini & Rosanna Irene Comoretto & Chiara Piovan & Barbara Martin & Beatrice Albanesi & Marco Clari & Valerio Dimonte & Sara Campagna, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Improving Waste Management Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Prasit Kailomsom & Charoenchai Khompatraporn, 2023. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Multi-Facility Decisions of Infectious Waste Transshipment and Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Zaiwu Gong & Lihong Wang, 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Lihong Wang & Zaiwu Gong, 2017. "Priority of a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation with a Normal Distribution in Meteorological Disaster Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Navigating Sustainability: Unveiling Responsible Consumption and Production in Developing Economies for SDG 12 Achievement," MPRA Paper 118214, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Jul 2023.
    8. Damianos P. Sakas & Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Nikos Kanellos & Christos Christopoulos & Kanellos S. Toudas, 2023. "Determining Factors for Supply Chain Services Provider Selection and Long-Term Relationship Maintenance: Evidence from Greece," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Rania Berrachedi & Rachid Chaib & Hafida Kahoul & Ion Verzea, 2024. "Towards a sustainable supply chain: contribution to hospital waste management in an Algerian hospital," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(4(77)), pages 6-14, June.
    10. Xiao Tan & Zaiwu Gong & Minji Huang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Selecting Cooking Methods to Decrease Persistent Organic Pollutant Concentrations in Food of Animal Origin Using a Consensus Decision-Making Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Weronika Urbańska & Anna Janda & Magdalena Osial & Mateusz Słowikowski, 2023. "Sustainable Municipal Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Case Study of Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Wendi Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Erhua Zhang, 2023. "Fermatean Fuzzy IWP-TOPSIS-GRA Multi-Criteria Group Analysis and Its Application to Healthcare Waste Treatment Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:298-:d:1309461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.