IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i2p187-d90289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Cooking Methods to Decrease Persistent Organic Pollutant Concentrations in Food of Animal Origin Using a Consensus Decision-Making Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Zaiwu Gong

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Minji Huang

    (Fujian Education Examinations Authority, 59 Beihuanzhong Road, Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, China
    Department of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Zhou-Jing Wang

    (School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) pose serious threats to human health. Increasing attention has been paid to POPs to protect the environment and prevent disease. Humans are exposed to POPs through diet (the major route), inhaling air and dust and skin contact. POPs are very lipophilic and hydrophobic, meaning that they accumulate in fatty tissues in animals and can biomagnify. Humans can therefore be exposed to relatively high POP concentrations in food of animal origin. Cooking animal products can decrease the POP contents, and different cooking methods achieve different reduction rates. Here, a consensus decision-making model with interval preference relations is used to prioritize cooking methods for specific animal products in terms of reducing POP concentrations. Two consistency mathematical expressions ( I -consistency and I I -consistency) are defined, then the ideal interval preference relations are determined for the cooking methods with respect to different social choice principles. The objective is to minimize disparities between individual judgments and the ideal consensus judgment. Consistency is used as a constraint to determine the rationality of the consistency definitions. A numerical example indicated that baking is the best cooking method for decreasing POP concentrations in grass carp. The I -consistency results were more acceptable than the I I -consistency results.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Tan & Zaiwu Gong & Minji Huang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Selecting Cooking Methods to Decrease Persistent Organic Pollutant Concentrations in Food of Animal Origin Using a Consensus Decision-Making Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:187-:d:90289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/2/187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/2/187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Mingming & Ren, Peiyu & Lan, Jibin & Wang, Jun & Zheng, Weimin, 2014. "Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 771-773.
    2. González-Pachón, Jacinto & Romero, Carlos, 2016. "Bentham, Marx and Rawls ethical principles: In search for a compromise," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 47-51.
    3. Hye Ah Lee & Su Hyun Park & Young Sun Hong & Eun Hee Ha & Hyesook Park, 2016. "The Effect of Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants on Metabolic Health among KOREAN Children during a 1-Year Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Liu, Fang & Zhang, Wei-Guo & Zhang, Li-Hua, 2014. "Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 718-726.
    5. Lindsay M. Jaacks & Dana Boyd Barr & Rajeshwari Sundaram & Jagteshwar Grewal & Cuilin Zhang & Germaine M. Buck Louis, 2016. "Pre-Pregnancy Maternal Exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants and Gestational Weight Gain: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Xu, Zeshui & Chen, Jian, 2008. "Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 266-280, January.
    7. Xiayu Tong & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2016. "A Group Decision Framework with Intuitionistic Preference Relations and Its Application to Low Carbon Supplier Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Wuyong Qian & Zhou-Jing Wang & Kevin W. Li, 2016. "Medical Waste Disposal Method Selection Based on a Hierarchical Decision Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ping Lu & Xuan Yang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2018. "Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-Carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Lihong Wang & Zaiwu Gong, 2017. "Priority of a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation with a Normal Distribution in Meteorological Disaster Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Zaiwu Gong & Lihong Wang, 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    2. Zaiwu Gong & Lihong Wang, 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Lihong Wang & Zaiwu Gong, 2017. "Priority of a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation with a Normal Distribution in Meteorological Disaster Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Meng, Fanyong & Tan, Chunqiao & Chen, Xiaohong, 2017. "Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-38.
    5. Wang, Zhou-Jing & Li, Kevin W., 2015. "A multi-step goal programming approach for group decision making with incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 890-900.
    6. Qi Wei & Rui Wang & Chuan-Yang Ruan, 2024. "Similarity Measures of Probabilistic Interval Preference Ordering Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    8. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Francisco Salas-Molina, 2022. "Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5685-5706, November.
    9. Jun Liu & Xianbin Wu & Shouzhen Zeng & Tiejun Pan, 2017. "Intuitionistic Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision-Making with Induced Aggregation Operator and Its Application to Low Carbon Supplier Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, November.
    10. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2013. "On Consensus of Group Decision Making with Interval Utility Values and Interval Preference Orderings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 997-1019, November.
    11. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2015. "Generalized analytic network process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 277-288.
    12. Qiuxuan Wu & Rui Zhang & Xiaoxiang Wang & Yizhuo Li, 2022. "A Theoretical Study of the Interactions between Persistent Organic Pollutants and Graphene Oxide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    13. Yibin Zhang & Kevin W. Li & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Prioritization and Aggregation of Intuitionistic Preference Relations: A Multiplicative-Transitivity-Based Transformation from Intuitionistic Judgment Data to Priority Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 409-436, March.
    14. Ye, Qing Chuan & Zhang, Yingqian & Dekker, Rommert, 2017. "Fair task allocation in transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-16.
    15. Naffisah Othman & Zaliha Ismail & Mohamad Ikhsan Selamat & Siti Hamimah Sheikh Abdul Kadir & Nur Amirah Shibraumalisi, 2022. "A Review of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Pollution in the Air: Where and How Much Are We Exposed to?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Ping Lu & Xuan Yang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2018. "Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-Carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Fang Liu & Mao-Jie Huang & Cai-Xia Huang & Witold Pedrycz, 2022. "Measuring consistency of interval-valued preference relations: comments and comparison," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 371-399, March.
    18. Liu, Fang & Zhang, Wei-Guo & Zhang, Li-Hua, 2014. "Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 718-726.
    19. Jana Krejčí, 2019. "On extension of multiplicative consistency to interval fuzzy preference relations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 783-815, September.
    20. Ji Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Chonghui Zhang, 2018. "An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:187-:d:90289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.