IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7681-d1141363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creative Economy and Sustainable Regional Growth: Lessons from the Implementation of Entrepreneurial Discovery Process at the Regional Level

Author

Listed:
  • Manolis Manioudis

    (Department of Economics, University of Patras, 26504 Patra, Greece
    Institute of Commerce and Services (INEMY-ESEE), 10563 Athens, Greece)

  • Antonios Angelakis

    (Department of Political Science, University of Crete, 74100 Rethymno, Greece
    Small Enterprises’ Institute (IME-GSEVEE), 10433 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The creative economy sector is tightly associated with sustainable development and Sustainable Economic Goals (SDGs). The creative industries contribute to sustainability in a variety of ways. They are essential in accelerating sustainable consumption and production patterns and promoting regional sustainable development. This paper attempts to stress the role of the creative economy in promoting sustainable regional growth by focusing on smart specialization priority areas in the region of Attica. The latter has been accomplished by presenting the current regional policy model and the entrepreneurial discovery process (EDP) methodology in the region of Attica. This paper concludes that the EDP paves the way for the formulation of policy lessons enhancing the link between the creative economy and sustainable regional growth. In a nutshell, three major conclusions derived from the present paper include the following aspects: (i) the formulation of an integrated smart specialisation strategy requires an ongoing and well-structured process along the policy cycle (structured life-cycle approach); (ii) the deployment of a robust innovation ecosystem requires a comprehensive approach of engaging and mobilising regional actors and identifying their needs and priorities; (iii) the lessons observed through the exploration of the case study lead to concrete findings regarding the critical importance of long-term interactive institutional learning and policy co-design as a precondition for an effective regional ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Manolis Manioudis & Antonios Angelakis, 2023. "Creative Economy and Sustainable Regional Growth: Lessons from the Implementation of Entrepreneurial Discovery Process at the Regional Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7681-:d:1141363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Throsby, 2015. "Development Strategies for Pacific Island Economies: Is There a Role for the Cultural Industries?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 370-382, May.
    2. Fatime Barbara Hegyi & Fabrizio Guzzo & Inmaculada Perianez Forte & Carlo Gianelle, 2021. "The Smart Specialisation Policy Experience: Perspective of National and Regional Authorities," JRC Research Reports JRC123918, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. Elisabetta Marinelli & Inmaculada Perianez Forte, 2017. "Smart Specialisation at work: The entrepreneurial discovery as a continuous process," JRC Research Reports JRC108571, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Gregg A. Lichtenstein & Thomas S. Lyons, 2001. "The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(1), pages 3-20, February.
    6. Asheim, Bjorn T & Isaksen, Arne, 2002. "Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local 'Sticky' and Global 'Ubiquitous' Knowledge," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 77-86, January.
    7. Ogenis Brilhante & Jannes Klaas, 2018. "Green City Concept and a Method to Measure Green City Performance over Time Applied to Fifty Cities Globally: Influence of GDP, Population Size and Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Marta Peris-Ortiz & João J. Ferreira & Luís Farinha & Nuno O. Fernandes, 2016. "Introduction to Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & João J. Ferreira & Luís Farinha & Nuno O. Fernandes (ed.), Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness, chapter 0, pages 1-13, Springer.
    9. Dominique Foray, 2018. "Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy—a case study on the emergence of new policy practices," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 817-832.
    10. Ke Rong & Y. Lin & J. Yu & Y. Zhang & A. Radziwon, 2021. "Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: an empirical study in China," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 545-569, May.
    11. Karina Andreea Gruia & Razvan-Cătălin Dobrea & Cezar-Petre Simion & Cristina Dima & Alexandra Grecu & Oana Simona Hudea & Marian Marin & Ion Andronache & Daniel Peptenatu, 2019. "The Use of Sholl and Kolmogorov Complexity Analysis in Researching on the Sustainable Development of Creative Economies in the Development Region of Bucharest‒Ilfov, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Paul Krugman, 1992. "Geography and Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262610868, April.
    13. Tobias Buchmann & Andreas Pyka, 2015. "The evolution of innovation networks: the case of a publicly funded German automotive network," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 114-139, March.
    14. Maximilian Benner, 2019. "Smart specialization and institutional context: the role of institutional discovery, change and leapfrogging," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 1791-1810, September.
    15. Rafael Boix-Domenech & Vicent Soler-Marco, 2017. "Creative service industries and regional productivity," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 261-279, June.
    16. Asheim, Bjorn T. & Coenen, Lars, 2005. "Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1173-1190, October.
    17. Marta Peris-Ortiz & João J. Ferreira & Luís Farinha & Nuno O. Fernandes (ed.), 2016. "Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, Springer, number 978-3-319-29677-7, December.
    18. Manolis Manioudis & Giorgos Meramveliotakis, 2022. "Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: a return to the classical political economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 866-878, September.
    19. Dominique Foray, 2019. "On sector-non-neutral innovation policy: towards new design principles," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1379-1397, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elahe Hosseini & Alireza Rajabipoor Meybodi, 2023. "Proposing a Model for Sustainable Development of Creative Industries Based on Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Lihui Li & Huimin Wang, 2023. "Influence of Green Investment on China’s Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Ebru Kerimoglu, 2024. "Is Creativity-Based Urban Development Possible in Turkey? An Evaluation of Small Cities on the Aegean Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-27, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Cappellano & Francesco Molica & Teemu Makkonen, 2024. "Missions and Cohesion Policy: is there a match?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 360-374.
    2. Cristina Chaminade & Monica Plechero, 2015. "Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Systems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 215-237, February.
    3. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Edward L. Glaeser, 1998. "Are Cities Dying?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 139-160, Spring.
    5. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    6. Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 2004. "EU Expansion and EU Growth," International Economic Association Series, in: Alan V. Deardorff (ed.), The Past, Present and Future of the European Union, chapter 5, pages 74-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Rosina Moreno & Ernest Miguélez, 2012. "A Relational Approach To The Geography Of Innovation: A Typology Of Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 492-516, July.
    8. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Baldwin, Richard E. & Krugman, Paul, 2004. "Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Mario Davide Parrilli, 2010. "Heterogeneous Social Capitals: A New Window of Opportunity for Local Economies," Working Papers 2010R06, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    11. Jaya Prakash Pradhan & Mohammad Zohair, 2015. "Subnational Export Performance and Determinants," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 7(2), pages 133-174, August.
    12. Berliant, Marcus & Konishi, Hideo, 2000. "The endogenous formation of a city: population agglomeration and marketplaces in a location-specific production economy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 289-324, May.
    13. Qiu, Shumin & Liu, Xielin & Gao, Taishan, 2017. "Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1299-1311.
    14. Chen, Liang-Chih, 2015. "Building extra-regional networks for regional innovation systems: Taiwan's machine tool industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 107-117.
    15. Wu, Bingyu & Levinson, David M., 2024. "A multi-modal analysis of the effect of transport on population and productivity in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Fosfuri, Andrea & Rønde, Thomas, 2003. "High-Tech Clusters, Technology Spillovers and Trade Secret Laws," CEPR Discussion Papers 4130, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Gerlach, Heiko & Rønde, Thomas & Stahl, Konrad, 2009. "Labor pooling in R&D intensive industries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 99-111, January.
    18. Christophe Carrincazeaux & Frédéric Gaschet, 2006. "Knowledge and the diversity of innovation systems: a comparative analysis of European regions," Post-Print hal-00257384, HAL.
    19. Junsong Wang & Martha Prevezer, 2015. "Related variety in Chinese cities: local and Foreign Direct Investment related variety and impacts on urban growth," Working Papers 59, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    20. Karolina Ekholm & Katariina Hakkala, 2007. "Location of R&D and High-Tech Production by Vertically Integrated Multinationals," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(518), pages 512-543, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7681-:d:1141363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.