IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7433-d1137269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Study of the Suitability of Urban Underground Spaces for Connection Development: A Case Study of the Erhai Lake Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yangbin Zhang

    (Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Yuhan Chen

    (School of Continuing Education, West Yunnan University of Applied Sciences, Dali 671000, China)

  • Fengshan Jiang

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Zhanting Deng

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Zhiqiang Xie

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Yuning Zhang

    (School of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Ping Wen

    (Kunming Engineering Corporation Limited, Kunming 650216, China)

Abstract

Urban underground space (UUS) involves multiple stakeholders whose concerns span the entire life cycle of underground space. The government pays more attention to the social benefits of UUS to the region, developers pay more attention to the economic benefits brought by the development of UUS, and users pay more attention to the comfort level of UUS operation. This study used the analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), government, developers, and users to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system of underground space development needs. Different from previous studies, considering the need for future connectivity development in the UUS circle, this paper proposes to comprehensively consider the impact of connectivity development on regional suitability through coupled AHP and cellular automata (CA). The results show that about 102.67 km 2 (13.03%) underground area of Erhai Lake Basin is suitable for underground space development. Compared with the traditional evaluation method, the evaluation result of about 31.41 km 2 (3.99%) area was improved, and the fragmentation problem between blocks was improved. This method is of great value to the comprehensive development of UUS in the Erhai Lake Basin and is helping to improve future underground space planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yangbin Zhang & Yuhan Chen & Fengshan Jiang & Zhanting Deng & Zhiqiang Xie & Yuning Zhang & Ping Wen, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of the Suitability of Urban Underground Spaces for Connection Development: A Case Study of the Erhai Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7433-:d:1137269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naief A. Aldossary & Jamal K. Alghamdi & Abdulaziz A. Alzahrani & Ali Alqahtany & Saleh H. Alyami, 2023. "Evaluation of Planned Sustainable Urban Development Projects in Al-Baha Region Using Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Eugénie L. Birch, 2009. "Downtown in the “New American Cityâ€," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 626(1), pages 134-153, November.
    3. Iman Junianto & Sunardi & Dadan Sumiarsa, 2023. "The Possibility of Achieving Zero CO 2 Emission in the Indonesian Cement Industry by 2050: A Stakeholder System Dynamic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Xiaobo Zhang & Chengshan Wang & Jie Fan & Huijun Wang & Hailong Li, 2020. "Optimizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process through a Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development in Tonghu District, Huizhou City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Alvin Baskoro Adhi & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Development of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies to Improve Sustainable Construction Implementation Based on Lean Construction Principles in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sueun Jung & Jihyun Lee, 2023. "Exploring a Conceptual Framework of Koreans’ Residential Satisfaction Based on Maslow’s Human Needs: A Qualitative and Quantitative Integrated Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    2. Brinkley, Catherine & Raj, Subhashni, 2022. "Perfusion and urban thickness: The shape of cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Sada Hasan & Zeynep Işık & Gökhan Demirdöğen, 2024. "Evaluating the Contribution of Lean Construction to Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Yunxin Chen & Dong Qiu & Xiaomin Chen, 2024. "Integrating Lean Construction with Sustainable Construction: Drivers, Dilemmas and Countermeasures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Preechaya Navaraj & Vorapat Inkarojrit, 2024. "Beyond Illumination: Stakeholder Perspectives on Urban Lighting Master Planning for Chiang Mai Old City, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-50, October.
    6. Chunlei Zhou & Donghai Xuan & Yuhan Miao & Xiaohu Luo & Wensi Liu & Yihong Zhang, 2023. "Accounting CO 2 Emissions of the Cement Industry: Based on an Electricity–Carbon Coupling Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Zhaoliang Peng & Yu Zhang & Fei Tan & Jiahe Lv & Lianghui Li, 2023. "Variable-Weight Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development Considering Socioeconomic Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Richard P. Voith & Susan M. Wachter, 2009. "Urban Growth and Housing Affordability: The Conflict," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 626(1), pages 112-131, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7433-:d:1137269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.