IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6676-d1123833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter Estimation of Fuel Cells Using a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Manish Kumar Singla

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Courses in Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India)

  • Jyoti Gupta

    (Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Beant Singh

    (Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Parag Nijhawan

    (Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Department, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Adel El-Shahat

    (Energy Technology Program, School of Engineering Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

Because of the current increase in energy requirement, reduction in fossil fuels, and global warming, as well as pollution, a suitable and promising alternative to the non-renewable energy sources is proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Hence, the efficiency of the renewable energy source can be increased by extracting the precise values for each of the parameters of the renewable mathematical model. Various optimization algorithms have been proposed and developed in order to estimate the parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In this manuscript, a novel hybrid algorithm, i.e., Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish (HPSOPF), based on the Particle Swarm Optimization and Puffer Fish algorithms, was proposed to estimate the proton exchange membrane fuel cell parameters. The two models were taken for the parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, i.e., Ballard Mark V and Avista SR-12 model. Firstly, justification of the proposed algorithm was achieved by benchmarking it on 10 functions and then a comparison of the parameter estimation results obtained using the Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish algorithm was done with other meta-heuristic algorithms, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization, Puffer Fish algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, Grey Wolf Optimization Cuckoo Search, and Particle Swarm Optimization Grey Wolf Optimization. The sum of the square error was used as an evaluation metric for the performance evaluation and efficiency of the proposed algorithm. The results obtained show that the value of the sum of square error was smallest in the case of the proposed HPSOPF, while for the Ballard Mark V model it was 6.621 × 10 −9 and for the Avista SR-12 model it was 5.65 × 10 −8 . To check the superiority and robustness of the proposed algorithm computation time, voltage–current (V–I) curve, power–current (P–I) curve, convergence curve, different operating temperature conditions, and different pressure results were obtained. From these results, it is concluded that the Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish algorithm had a better performance in comparison with the other compared algorithms. Furthermore, a non-parametric test, i.e., the Friedman Ranking Test, was performed and the results demonstrate that the efficiency and robustness of the proposed hybrid algorithm was superior.

Suggested Citation

  • Manish Kumar Singla & Jyoti Gupta & Beant Singh & Parag Nijhawan & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Adel El-Shahat, 2023. "Parameter Estimation of Fuel Cells Using a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6676-:d:1123833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narinder Singh & S. B. Singh, 2017. "Hybrid Algorithm of Particle Swarm Optimization and Grey Wolf Optimizer for Improving Convergence Performance," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, November.
    2. Sun, Zhe & Wang, Ning & Bi, Yunrui & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2015. "Parameter identification of PEMFC model based on hybrid adaptive differential evolution algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1334-1341.
    3. El-Fergany, Attia A., 2018. "Extracting optimal parameters of PEM fuel cells using Salp Swarm Optimizer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 641-648.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hassan Ali, Hossam & Fathy, Ahmed, 2024. "Reliable exponential distribution optimizer-based methodology for modeling proton exchange membrane fuel cells at different conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Shuhui & Wang, Yong & Wang, Zhi, 2019. "Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder-Mead simplex method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 457-467.
    2. Hegazy Rezk & Tabbi Wilberforce & A. G. Olabi & Rania M. Ghoniem & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Fuzzy Modelling and Optimization to Decide Optimal Parameters of the PEMFC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Kandidayeni, M. & Macias, A. & Khalatbarisoltani, A. & Boulon, L. & Kelouwani, S., 2019. "Benchmark of proton exchange membrane fuel cell parameters extraction with metaheuristic optimization algorithms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 912-925.
    4. Gouda, Eid A. & Kotb, Mohamed F. & El-Fergany, Attia A., 2021. "Jellyfish search algorithm for extracting unknown parameters of PEM fuel cell models: Steady-state performance and analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. El-Hay, E.A. & El-Hameed, M.A. & El-Fergany, A.A., 2019. "Optimized Parameters of SOFC for steady state and transient simulations using interior search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 451-461.
    6. Wang, Nan & Wang, Dongxuan & Xing, Yazhou & Shao, Limin & Afzal, Sadegh, 2020. "Application of co-evolution RNA genetic algorithm for obtaining optimal parameters of SOFC model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 221-233.
    7. Rezk, Hegazy & Olabi, A.G. & Ferahtia, Seydali & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2022. "Accurate parameter estimation methodology applied to model proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Mohamed Louzazni & Sameer Al-Dahidi & Marco Mussetta, 2020. "Fuel Cell Characteristic Curve Approximation Using the Bézier Curve Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Ahmed M. Agwa & Attia A. El-Fergany & Gamal M. Sarhan, 2019. "Steady-State Modeling of Fuel Cells Based on Atom Search Optimizer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Seleem, Sameh I. & Hasanien, Hany M. & El-Fergany, Attia A., 2021. "Equilibrium optimizer for parameter extraction of a fuel cell dynamic model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-128.
    11. Yang, Fan & Li, Yuehua & Chen, Dongfang & Hu, Song & Xu, Xiaoming, 2024. "Parameter identification of PEMFC steady-state model based on p-dimensional extremum seeking via simplex tuning optimization method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    12. Hachana, Oussama & El-Fergany, Attia A., 2022. "Efficient PEM fuel cells parameters identification using hybrid artificial bee colony differential evolution optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    13. Rezk, Hegazy & Ferahtia, Seydali & Djeroui, Ali & Chouder, Aissa & Houari, Azeddine & Machmoum, Mohamed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Optimal parameter estimation strategy of PEM fuel cell using gradient-based optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    14. Samuel Raafat Fahim & Hany M. Hasanien & Rania A. Turky & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Abdullrahman A. Al-Shamma’a & Abdullah M. Noman & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Francisco Jurado, 2021. "Parameter Identification of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Based on Hunger Games Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Wenbin Su & Hongbo Wei & Penghua Guo & Ruizhe Guo, 2021. "Remote Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Ocean Current Energy Hydraulic Transmission and Control Power Generation System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Rezk, Hegazy & Nassef, Ahmed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben & Karuppasamy, K. & Aslam, Jawad & Gilani, Syed Omer, 2020. "Improving fuel cell performance via optimal parameters identification through fuzzy logic based-modeling and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    17. Hazem Hassan Ellithy & Adel M. Taha & Hany M. Hasanien & Mahmoud A. Attia & Adel El-Shahat & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem, 2022. "Estimation of Parameters of Triple Diode Photovoltaic Models Using Hybrid Particle Swarm and Grey Wolf Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Xu, Liangfei & Fang, Chuan & Hu, Junming & Cheng, Siliang & Li, Jianqiu & Ouyang, Minggao & Lehnert, Werner, 2017. "Parameter extraction of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell based on quasi-dynamic model and periphery signals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 675-690.
    19. Chen, Ben & Cai, Yonghua & Tu, Zhengkai & Chan, Siew Hwa & Wang, Jun & Yu, Yi, 2017. "Gas purging effect on the degradation characteristic of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with dead-ended mode operation I. With different electrolytes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 40-49.
    20. Priya, K. & Sathishkumar, K. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "A comprehensive review on parameter estimation techniques for Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 121-144.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6676-:d:1123833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.