IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5595-d1104447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Nomination Committee Members—Stakeholders’ Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hildur Magnusdottir

    (Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Audur Arna Arnardottir

    (School of Business, Reykjavik University, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson

    (Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
    Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Abstract

Sustainability is a critical issue for businesses today, and corporate boards and nomination committees play a vital role in promoting sustainable practices within organizations. Nomination Committees (NCs) have become important mechanisms for what has been coined as good or sustainable governance. Stakeholders, however, have different opinions on the merits of these committees. Amongst other things, there is disagreement about whom to select for NCs and the criteria for selection. The composition of NCs can influence board nominations and determine whether the necessary knowledge and skills reside within a board to deal with sustainability and good corporate governance. The aim of this research is to provide insights into stakeholders’ perspectives on what matters when profiling nomination committees’ members. The literature on NCs is underdeveloped, and this research importantly addresses the issue by interviewing 13 individuals who are either shareholders, board members of listed companies, or members of NCs. Additionally, a questionnaire was sent to shareholders, board members, and NC members of the 300 largest companies in Iceland. A total of 138 responses were received. The results show that stakeholders believe it is important to decide upon an NC’s composition prior to electing its members. NC members should have either management or board membership experience. Diversity within the committees is also seen to be important, as it can influence diversity and inclusion overall at the board level. These research results provide important insights and understanding for shareholders and boards of directors when composing nomination committees.

Suggested Citation

  • Hildur Magnusdottir & Audur Arna Arnardottir & Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, 2023. "Selecting Nomination Committee Members—Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5595-:d:1104447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf H. Carlsson, 2007. "Swedish Corporate Governance and Value Creation: owners still in the driver's seat," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1038-1055, November.
    2. Adams, Renée B. & Ragunathan, Vanitha & Tumarkin, Robert, 2021. "Death by committee? An analysis of corporate board (sub-) committees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1119-1146.
    3. Winfried Ruigrok & Simon Peck & Sabina Tacheva & Peder Greve & Yan Hu, 2006. "The Determinants and Effects of Board Nomination Committees," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 10(2), pages 119-148, May.
    4. Richard Clune & Dana R. Hermanson & James G. Tompkins & Zhongxia (Shelly) Ye, 2014. "The Nominating Committee Process: A Qualitative Examination of Board Independence and Formalization," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 748-786, September.
    5. Elizabeth Carson, 2002. "Factors Associated with the Development of Board Sub–committees," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 4-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, 2019. "What have we learnt about board gender diversity as a business strategy? The appointment of board subcommittees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 301-315, February.
    2. Walther, Axel & Morner, Michèle & Calabrò, Andrea, 2017. "The role of behaviorally integrated nominating committees in non-executive director selection processes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 351-361.
    3. Polovina, Nereida & Peasnell, Ken, 2020. "Do minority acquisitions transfer better corporate governance practices? An analysis of UK's cross-border minority investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    4. Tao, Ngoc Bich & Hutchinson, Marion, 2013. "Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 83-99.
    5. Nava Subramaniam & Lisa McManus & Jiani Zhang, 2009. "Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(4), pages 316-339, April.
    6. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    7. Adam Esplin & Karim Jamal & Shyam Sunder, 2018. "Demand for and Assessment of Audit Quality in Private Companies," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 319-352, September.
    8. Graaf, Johan & Kraus, Kalle & Strömsten, Torkel, 2022. "The problematics of financialization – On the important (but neglected) horizontal axis of organizational action," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Szymon Kaczmarek & Richard Nyuur, 2022. "The implications of board nationality and gender diversity: evidence from a qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 707-733, September.
    10. Shibashish Mukherjee & Sorin M.S. Krammer, 2024. "When the going gets tough : Board gender diversity in the wake of a major crisis," Post-Print hal-04522722, HAL.
    11. Sara Diogo & Teresa Carvalho & Zélia Breda, 2021. "Nomination vs. election: do they influence women’s access to institutional decision-making bodies?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 879-898, September.
    12. Puławska Karolina & Dobija Dorota & Piotrowska Katarzyna & Kravchenko Grygorii, 2021. "Audit Committee Formation: The Case of Poland," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 169-212, June.
    13. Ingolf Dittmann & Amy Yazhu Li & Stefan Obernberger & Jiaqi Zheng, 2022. "The corporate calendar and the timing of share repurchases and equity compensation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-101/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    15. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, October.
    16. Baldacchino, Peter J. & Gatt, Jessica & Tabone, Norbert & Bezzina, Frank, 2018. "The Nomination Committee in Maltese Listed Companies," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 125-139, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    17. Ibrahim Khalifa Elmghaamez & Jacinta Nwachukwu & Collins G. Ntim, 2024. "ESG disclosure and financial performance of multinational enterprises: The moderating effect of board standing committees," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 3593-3638, July.
    18. Zhilan Feng & Chinmoy Ghosh & C. Sirmans, 2007. "CEO Involvement in Director Selection: Implications for REIT Dividend Policy," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 385-410, November.
    19. Salau O. Abdulmalik & Ayoib Che Ahmad, 2015. "The Effect of 2011 Revised Code of Corporate Governance on Pricing Behaviour of Nigerian Auditors," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(4), pages 45-65.
    20. Laura Battaglia & Timothy Christensen & Stephen Hansen & Szymon Sacher, 2024. "Inference for Regression with Variables Generated from Unstructured Data," Papers 2402.15585, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5595-:d:1104447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.