IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4906-d1092719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prefabrication Implementation Potential Evaluation in Rural Housing Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of Counties in Chongqing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyuan Shi

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Jiaqing Sun

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Abstract

Prefabrication as a sustainable construction method has become a trend for use in house construction. However, the construction of rural houses in China still mainly adopts on-site construction, which also raises wasteful resources and environmental problems. Previous studies lack an evaluation system for the implementation potential of prefabricated rural housing in counties, and thus cannot provide references for the government to formulate implementation strategies. This study uses PEST analysis to establish an evaluation index system for the implementation potential of prefabricated rural housing and then evaluates 32 counties in Chongqing with urbanization rates below 90% based on the entropy weighted TOPSIS model. The results show that the weight values of the four evaluation subsystems of political, economic, social, and technological are 0.4516, 0.3152, 0.0684, and 0.1648, respectively; the nearness degrees of Dianjiang, Yubei, Jiangjin, and Rongchang are 0.5475, 0.4439, 0.4312, and 0.4103, respectively, ranking in the top four in Chongqing. The results indicate that the potential of implementing prefabricated rural housing in Chongqing is closely related to policy orientation and construction industrialization; Dianjiang, Yubei, Jiangjin, and Rongchang have the relative advantage of implementing prefabricated rural housing. Finally, this paper proposes political, economic, social, and technological suggestions for the implementation of prefabricated rural housing in Chongqing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyuan Shi & Jiaqing Sun, 2023. "Prefabrication Implementation Potential Evaluation in Rural Housing Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of Counties in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4906-:d:1092719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Nijkamp, 1977. "Stochastic Quantitative And Qualitative Multicriteria Analysis For Environmental Design," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 175-199, January.
    2. Lara Jaillon & C. S. Poon, 2008. "Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 953-966.
    3. Qianqian Shi & Ziyu Wang & Boya Li & Marcel Hertogh & Shuyi Wang, 2022. "Evolutionary Analysis of Prefabrication Implementation in Construction Projects under Low-Carbon Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    5. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Valentinas Podvezko, 2016. "Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 267-283, March.
    6. Nick Blismas & Christine Pasquire & Alistair Gibb, 2006. "Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 121-130.
    7. Seker, Sukran & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2021. "Socio-economic evaluation model for sustainable solar PV panels using a novel integrated MCDM methodology: A case in Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Hong Xue & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Zezhou Wu, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Capital Cost of Prefabrication—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Zhanyong Jin & Shuang Xia & Huanhuan Cao & Xiaohan Geng & Zimeng Cheng & Hongbo Sun & Menglin Jia & Qingyue Liu & Jie Sun, 2022. "Evaluation and Optimization of Sustainable Development Level of Construction Industrialization: Case Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Zezhou Wu & Lirong Luo & Heng Li & Ying Wang & Guoqiang Bi & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari, 2021. "An Analysis on Promoting Prefabrication Implementation in Construction Industry towards Sustainability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    12. Xin Yu & Sid Suntrayuth & Jiafu Su, 2020. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Industrial Sewage Treatment Projects Based on the Improved Entropy-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Evans, Meredydd & Yu, Sha & Song, Bo & Deng, Qinqin & Liu, Jing & Delgado, Alison, 2014. "Building energy efficiency in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 243-251.
    14. Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    16. Amin Mahmoudi & Xiaopeng Deng & Saad Ahmed Javed & Na Zhang, 2021. "Sustainable Supplier Selection in Megaprojects: Grey Ordinal Priority Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 318-339, January.
    17. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    18. Dong, Junyan & Jin, Hong, 2013. "The design strategy of green rural housing of Tibetan areas in Yunnan, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 63-67.
    19. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    20. He, Bao-jie & Yang, Li & Ye, Miao & Mou, Ben & Zhou, Yanan, 2014. "Overview of rural building energy efficiency in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 385-396.
    21. Kumar, Abhishek & Sah, Bikash & Singh, Arvind R. & Deng, Yan & He, Xiangning & Kumar, Praveen & Bansal, R.C., 2017. "A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 596-609.
    22. Ding-Yi Zhao & Yu-Yu Ma & Hung-Lung Lin, 2022. "Using the Entropy and TOPSIS Models to Evaluate Sustainable Development of Islands: A Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    23. Chiranjib Bhowmik & Mohamad Amin Kaviani & Amitava Ray & Lanndon Ocampo, 2020. "An Integrated Entropy-TOPSIS Methodology for Evaluating Green Energy Sources," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 44-70, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meijiao Song & Jun Cai & Yisi Xue, 2023. "From Technological Sustainability to Social Sustainability: An Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Residential Design Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Oleg Kapliński, 2023. "Architectural, Civil, and Infrastructure Engineering in View of Sustainability: Editor’s Comment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-7, March.
    3. Guisel Romero Quidel & Matías Javier Soto Acuña & Carlos Javier Rojas Herrera & Karin Rodríguez Neira & Juan Pablo Cárdenas-Ramírez, 2023. "Assessment of Modular Construction System Made with Low Environmental Impact Construction Materials for Achieving Sustainable Housing Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    2. Huibing Cheng & Shanshui Zheng & Jianghong Feng, 2022. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Ferry Operator Selection: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    4. Lin Zhang & Shan Guo & Zezhou Wu & Ahmed Alsaedi & Tasawar Hayat, 2018. "SWOT Analysis for the Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Rural Buildings: A Case Study of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Dragisa STANUJKIC & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Florentin SMARANDACHE & Zenonas TURSKIS, 2017. "The Use Of The Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Method For Determining The Weights Of Criteria," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 116-133, December.
    6. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    7. Witold Torbacki, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Mobility in the Szczecin Metropolitan Area in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The DEMATEL and PROMETHEE II Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Ateekh Ur Rehman & Syed Hammad Mian & Usama Umer & Yusuf Siraj Usmani, 2019. "Strategic Outcome Using Fuzzy-AHP-Based Decision Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Yandong He & Xu Wang & Yun Lin & Fuli Zhou, 2016. "Optimal Partner Combination for Joint Distribution Alliance using Integrated Fuzzy EW-AHP and TOPSIS for Online Shopping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Gan, Xiaolong & Liu, Lanchi & Wen, Tao & Webber, Ronald, 2022. "Modelling interrelationships between barriers to adopting green building technologies in China's rural housing via grey-DEMATEL," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Tingting Li & Dan Zhao & Guiyun Liu & Yuhong Wang, 2022. "How to Evaluate College Students’ Green Innovation Ability—A Method Combining BWM and Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Riley, David & Schaafsma, Marije & Marin-Moreno, Héctor & Minshull, Tim A., 2020. "A social, environmental and economic evaluation protocol for potential gas hydrate exploitation projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    13. Zida Song & Quan Liu & Zhigen Hu, 2020. "Decision-Making Framework, Enhanced by Mutual Inspection for First-Stage Dam Construction Diversion Scheme Selection," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 563-577, January.
    14. Qianqian Shi & Jianbo Zhu & Marcel Hertogh & Zhaohan Sheng, 2018. "Incentive Mechanism of Prefabrication in Mega Projects with Reputational Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Yekani Motlagh, Elgar & Hajjarian, Marzieh & Hossein Zadeh, Omid & Alijanpour, Ahmad, 2020. "The difference of expert opinion on the forest-based ecotourism development in developed countries and Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Aisikaer Molake & Rui Zhang & Yihuan Zhou, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Daylight Performance and Thermal Comfort of Enclosed-Courtyard Rural Residence in a Cold Climate Zone, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    17. BULUT, Merve & ÖZCAN, Evrencan, 2021. "A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2016. "A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.
    20. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4906-:d:1092719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.