IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6734-d401361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Industrial Sewage Treatment Projects Based on the Improved Entropy-TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Yu

    (International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

  • Sid Suntrayuth

    (International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

  • Jiafu Su

    (National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

Abstract

Sewage treatment and reuse have always been hot issues in both the business and academic communities in all nations around the world. In order to solve the difficulties in accurate quantization and objective evaluation of industrial sewage treatment projects, this paper proposed a comprehensive industrial sewage treatment project evaluation method based on the improved entropy–TOPSIS method. First, this paper constructed an evaluation indicator system for sewage treatment projects from the four aspects of environmental performance, economic performance, managerial performance and social performance. Second, it made a modification to the experts’ experience-based grading using the entropy weight method and determined the weight of the indicators in a more objective and more accurate manner. Third, this work improved the traditional TOPSIS method and simplified the calculations with regard to the traditional TOPSIS-based comprehensive evaluation. Finally, by taking the example of evaluating industrial sewage treatment projects of the China Water Affairs Group in Q city (ChongQing), China, this paper verified the feasibility and practicability of the proposed comprehensive industrial sewage treatment project evaluation system and method.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Yu & Sid Suntrayuth & Jiafu Su, 2020. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Industrial Sewage Treatment Projects Based on the Improved Entropy-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6734-:d:401361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Jian & Yu Guo & Lin Jiang & Yanyan An & Jiafu Su, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Green Supply Chain Considering Environmental Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Jie Jian & Yuyao Zhang & Lin Jiang & Jiafu Su, 2020. "Coordination of Supply Chains with Competing Manufacturers considering Fairness Concerns," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Kalbar, Pradip P. & Karmakar, Subhankar & Asolekar, Shyam R., 2012. "Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 295-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Lang & Lijun Gu & Zhiying Chen & Chunhui Niu & Lin Li & Jinyuan Ma, 2023. "Ecological Quality Status Evaluation of Port Sea Areas Based on EW-GRA-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Qian Luo & Guohua Fang & Jian Ye & Min Yan & Chengxuan Lu, 2020. "Country Evaluation for China’s Hydropower Investment in the Belt and Road Initiative Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Fangzhong Qi & Leilei Zhang & Kexiang Zhuo & Xiuyan Ma, 2022. "Early Warning for Manufacturing Supply Chain Resilience Based on Improved Grey Prediction Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Jianjun Wang & Chicheng Ma & Sai Wang & Xiaojuan Lu & Dongyi Li, 2022. "Risk Assessment Model and Sensitivity Analysis of Ordinary Arterial Highways Based on RSR–CRITIC–LVSSM–EFAST," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Jingyuan Shi & Jiaqing Sun, 2023. "Prefabrication Implementation Potential Evaluation in Rural Housing Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of Counties in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu Yang & Han Qin & Quanxin Gan & Jiafu Su, 2020. "Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China’s A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Chun-Chin Wei & Liang-Tu Chen, 2021. "Supply Chain Replenishment Decision for Newsvendor Products with Multiple Periods and a Short Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Joshua Sohn & Pierre Bisquert & Patrice Buche & Abdelraouf Hecham & Pradip P. Kalbar & Ben Goldstein & Morten Birkved & Stig Irving Olsen, 2020. "Argumentation Corrected Context Weighting-Life Cycle Assessment: A Practical Method of Including Stakeholder Perspectives in Multi-Criteria Decision Support for LCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Samira Shayanmehr & Jana Ivanič Porhajašová & Mária Babošová & Mahmood Sabouhi Sabouni & Hosein Mohammadi & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & Naser Shahnoushi Foroushani, 2022. "The Impacts of Climate Change on Water Resources and Crop Production in an Arid Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Yang Lv & Xinhua Bi & Quanxi Li & Haowei Zhang, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making and Recycling Channel Selection under Carbon Allowance and Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Shen, Liang & Jin, Mingzhou, 2022. "Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Indranil De & Rooba Hasan & Mubashshir Iqbal, 2022. "Natural Treatment Systems and Importance of Social Cost Benefit Analysis in Developing Countries: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Yun Bai & Nejc Bezak & Klaudija Sapač & Mateja Klun & Jin Zhang, 2019. "Short-Term Streamflow Forecasting Using the Feature-Enhanced Regression Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4783-4797, November.
    11. Tianle Tian & Chuiyong Zheng & Liguo Yang & Xiaochun Luo & Lin Lu, 2022. "Optimal Recycling Channel Selection of Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    12. Md. Rabbi & Syed Mithun Ali & Golam Kabir & Zuhayer Mahtab & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Performance Prediction Using a Bayesian Belief Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Qiao Peng & Yao Xiao, 2020. "Will Third-Party Treatment Effectively Solve Issues Related to Industrial Pollution in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Wenming Sun & Leilei Jiang & Ke Dong, 2023. "Research on Supply Chain Coordination Decision Model Based on Green Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    16. Mehr Sadat Salami & Mohammadreza Eslamipirharati & Alireza Bakhshi & Amir Aghsami & Fariborz Jolai & Maziar Yazdani, 2022. "Does a Buyback Contract Coordinate a Reverse Supply Chain Facing Remanufacturing Capacity Disruption and Returned Product Quality Uncertainty?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Chauhan, Chetna & Kaur, Puneet & Arrawatia, Rakesh & Ractham, Peter & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Teamwork makes achieving SDGs dream work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 290-307.
    18. Lili Dai & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai, 2020. "CSR Remanufacturing Supply Chains under WTP Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Hui Zhang & Xin Su, 2021. "The Applications and Complexity Analysis Based on Supply Chain Enterprises’ Green Behaviors under Evolutionary Game Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Unutmaz Durmuşoğlu, Zeynep Didem, 2018. "Assessment of techno-entrepreneurship projects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6734-:d:401361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.