IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4784-d1090981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Network on the Kotaku Program in the Global South: Findings from Palembang, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Zubaidah

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia
    STIA Bala Putra Dewa Palembang, Jl. Urip Sumoharjo, Palembang 30118, Indonesia)

  • Ida Widianingsih

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia
    Center for Decentralization and Participatory Development Research, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

  • Budiman Rusli

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

  • Asep Djaja Saefullah

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

Abstract

Various programs have been implemented around the world to achieve slum upgrading, including in the city of Palembang, Indonesia, through the Kotaku Program. This program has been implemented since 2016 with a target of upgrading slum areas by 2020. However, the program has not reached the target. This study aims to identify the failure factors of not achieving the goal. This research uses a qualitative case study by conducting in-depth interviews with 20 various actors (i.e., government, academics, society, and media) involved in the Kotaku Program in Palembang City. Based on the policy network theory perspective, this research found three challenges in achieving the target, namely: (1) lack of collaboration between parties; (2) unclear roles of policy actors in housing and settlements; (3) the difficulty of building trust between actors to work together. From the interviews, new factors were found, including caring and integrity as influencing factors of the actor relationship intensity in a policy network. Consequently, to achieve success with the Kotaku Program, the aspect of the collaboration, trust, caring, integrity among stakeholders, and the aspect of the clarity of the role of the policy actors should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Zubaidah & Ida Widianingsih & Budiman Rusli & Asep Djaja Saefullah, 2023. "Policy Network on the Kotaku Program in the Global South: Findings from Palembang, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4784-:d:1090981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4784/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4784/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quattri, Maria & Watkins, Kevin, 2019. "Child labour and education – A survey of slum settlements in Dhaka (Bangladesh)," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 50-66.
    2. William D. Coleman & Anthony Perl, 1999. "Internationalized Policy Environments and Policy Network Analysis," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(4), pages 691-709, September.
    3. Young, D. & Borland, R. & Coghill, K., 2010. "An actor-network theory analysis of policy innovation for smoke-free places: Understanding change in complex systems," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1208-1217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Feizi & Saeed Malek Sadati & Mozhgan Asna-ashary, 2023. "Child Labor and Unemployment: a Tale of Two Associations in Urban and Rural Areas in Iran," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 1297-1314, June.
    2. Lihi Lahat, 2011. "How can leaders’ perceptions guide policy analysis in an era of governance?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(2), pages 135-155, June.
    3. Laura E Tate, 2013. "Growth-Management Implementation in Metropolitan Vancouver: Lessons from Actor-Network Theory," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 783-800, October.
    4. Khaoula Behi & Nivedita Agarwal & Alexander Brem, 2020. "An Analysis of a Crowdfunding System in North Africa Based on the Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 23-34, June.
    5. Secco, Laura & Pettenella, Davide & Gatto, Paola, 2011. "Forestry governance and collective learning process in Italy: Likelihood or utopia?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 104-112.
    6. Joshua Evans & Jeffrey R Masuda, 2020. "Mobilizing a fast policy fix: Exploring the translation of 10-year plans to end homelessness in Alberta, Canada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 503-521, May.
    7. Bisset, Sherri & Potvin, Louise & Daniel, Mark, 2013. "The adaptive nature of implementation practice: Case study of a school-based nutrition education intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 10-18.
    8. Carsten Daugbjerg, 2017. "Responding to Non-Linear Internationalisation of Public Policy: The World Trade Organization and Reform of the CAP 1992–2013," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 486-501, May.
    9. Reyes Calderón & José Álvarez-Arce & Silvia Mayoral, 2009. "Corporation as a Crucial Ally Against Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 319-332, April.
    10. Andrews, Gavin J. & Duff, Cameron, 2019. "Matter beginning to matter: On posthumanist understandings of the vital emergence of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 123-134.
    11. Sharon Werning Rivera, 2004. "Elites and the Diffusion of Foreign Models in Russia," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(1), pages 43-62, March.
    12. Brauer René & Dymitrow Mirek, 2014. "Quality of life in rural areas: A topic for the Rural Development policy?," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 25(25), pages 1-30, September.
    13. Krummel, Daniel & Siegfried, Patrick, 2021. "Child Labour Ethics through the Prism of Utilitarianism and Deontology," MPRA Paper 111403, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Laszlo Gadar & Janos Abonyi, 2018. "Graph configuration model based evaluation of the education-occupation match," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Linda Christie & Kenneth Gibb, 2015. "A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 871-887, December.
    16. Shim, Yongwoon & Shin, Dong-Hee, 2016. "Analyzing China’s Fintech Industry from the Perspective of Actor–Network Theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 168-181.
    17. Yanne Yuniarti Widayat & Nina Karlina & Mas Dadang Enjat Munajat & Sinta Ningrum, 2023. "Mapping Policy Actors Using Social Network Analysis on Integrated Urban Farming Program in Bandung City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Dymitrow Mirek, 2019. "The concept of ‘rural’ as a psychosocial process: From concept attainment to concept unlearning," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 15-28, December.
    19. Rayner, Jeremy & Howlett, Michael & Wilson, Jeremy & Cashore, Benjamin & Hoberg, George, 2001. "Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3-4), pages 319-332, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4784-:d:1090981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.