IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4203-d1080854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese Path to Sports Modernization: Fitness-for-All (Chinese) and a Development Model for Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaomu Li

    (College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Bin Wan

    (College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yaping Yao

    (College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Te Bu

    (College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Ping Li

    (College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (Independent Researcher, Orlando, FL 34786, USA)

Abstract

This policy review overviews the Chinese path to sports modernization within the theoretical framework of the Chinese path to modernization, which is centered on the principle of Fitness-for-All. Over a century of endeavors, the modernization of sports in China has created a new and comprehensive sports civilization in a developing country with a large population and inadequate sports resources. The essence of the Chinese path to sports modernization can be summarized as a people-centered process of sports modernization led by the Communist Party of China that relies on a top-level design with universal participation and seeks to develop a diverse global sports governance. The development of Chinese sports will not only make a transformative contribution to China’s commitment to its second Century Goal, but it will also provide a renaissance for the ancient Chinese philosophy of health first into a people-centered modernization theory, and contribute a Chinese blueprint for the pursuit of the advancement of cross-cultural, diverse world sports civilizations and sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaomu Li & Bin Wan & Yaping Yao & Te Bu & Ping Li & Yang Zhang, 2023. "Chinese Path to Sports Modernization: Fitness-for-All (Chinese) and a Development Model for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4203-:d:1080854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uzma Khan & Huili Wang & Ishraq Ali, 2021. "A Sustainable Community of Shared Future for Mankind: Origin, Evolution and Philosophical Foundation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Michael Zürn, 2018. "Contested Global Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(1), pages 138-145, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ollinaho, Ossi I. & Kröger, Markus, 2023. "Separating the two faces of “bioeconomy”: Plantation economy and sociobiodiverse economy in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Almut Schilling-Vacaflor, 2021. "Integrating Human Rights and the Environment in Supply Chain Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, Rafaela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Burns, Georgette Leah & Ross, Helen & Biggs, Duan, 2024. "‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Lange, Thomas & Villarreal, Pedro A. & Bärnighausen, Till, 2023. "Counter-contestation in global health governance: The WHO and its member states in emergency settings," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Lange, Thomas & Villarreal, Pedro A. & Bärnighausen, Till, 2023. "The contested authority of international institutions in global health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Joel Henrique Ellwanger & Carlos Afonso Nobre & José Artur Bogo Chies, 2022. "Brazilian Biodiversity as a Source of Power and Sustainable Development: A Neglected Opportunity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. de Queiroz-Stein, Guilherme & Martinelli, Fernanda S. & Dietz, Thomas & Siegel, Karen M., 2024. "Disputing the bioeconomy-biodiversity nexus in Brazil: Coalitions, discourses and policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Yigit Kazancoglu & Cisem Lafci & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Yalcin Berberoglu, 2024. "The role of agri‐food 4.0 in climate‐smart farming for controlling climate change‐related risks: A business perspective analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2788-2802, May.
    9. Leire Barañano & Naroa Garbisu & Itziar Alkorta & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Nannan Ge & Enuo Wang & Yuan Li, 2023. "Foreign Language Education for Sustainable Development in China: A Case Study of German Language Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Bastos Lima, Mairon G., 2022. "Just transition towards a bioeconomy: Four dimensions in Brazil, India and Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Joana Castro Pereira & João Terrenas, 2022. "Towards a transformative governance of the Amazon," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S3), pages 60-75, December.
    13. Jeffrey King & Andrew Lugg, 2023. "Politicising pandemics: Evidence from US media coverage of the World Health Organisation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 247-259, May.
    14. Shahzad, Fakhar & Zaied, Younes Ben & Shahzad, Muhammad Asim & Mahmood, Faisal, 2024. "Insights into the performance of green supply chain in the Chinese semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Shu Xu & Weimin Guo & Xinyi Wang & Zhaolian Xing, 2022. "Sustainable Relationship in Design: The Contribution Wisdom of Academies Landscape in Southern Jiangsu from an “Interpersonal View” Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Melo dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo & Nem Singh, Jewellord & Castro, Rui & Santos, Hugo & Costa, Hirdan Katarina de Medeiros & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2024. "SWOT analysis of Brazilian energy policy: A comparative panel data analysis of the twenty largest economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Reis, Tiago N.P. dos & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2024. "Not all supply chains are created equal: The linkages between soy local trade relations and development outcomes in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Kieran Harrahill & Áine Macken-Walsh & Eoin O’Neill & Mick Lennon, 2022. "An Analysis of Irish Dairy Farmers’ Participation in the Bioeconomy: Exploring Power and Knowledge Dynamics in a Multi-actor EIP-AGRI Operational Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-39, September.
    19. Alfredo de Toro & Carina Gunnarsson & Nils Jonsson & Martin Sundberg, 2021. "Effects of Variable Weather Conditions on Baled Proportion of Varied Amounts of Harvestable Cereal Straw, Based on Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Eva‐Maria Euchner & Nicolle Zeegers, 2022. "Indirect moral governance in prostitution policy: How regulators incorporate stigmatized actors in intermediation processes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 801-817, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4203-:d:1080854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.