IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v191y2024ics0301421524001927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SWOT analysis of Brazilian energy policy: A comparative panel data analysis of the twenty largest economies

Author

Listed:
  • Melo dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo
  • Nem Singh, Jewellord
  • Castro, Rui
  • Santos, Hugo
  • Costa, Hirdan Katarina de Medeiros
  • dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho

Abstract

This article endeavours to analyse Brazil's continuities and changes in energy policies with the transition from the Lula-Rousseff government to the Temer-Bolsonaro government. The comparative approach makes it possible to identify the endogenous and exogenous factors of the transformations in the energy market. The methodology intends to demonstrate the main strengths/opportunities and weaknesses/threats of market opening policies between 2003 and 2022. The findings show fiscal responsibility, the development model, internal and external demand, price, and private and political interests impacted by the results of these policies over the analysed period. It is evidenced that Brazil's performance in renewable energy is comparable to that of developed countries despite its lower investment capacity. The high potential for expansion also favours the prospects for biofuels, wind, and photovoltaics. The conclusion underscores that the Brazilian State emphasises the strategic nature of energy and its indispensable role in guaranteeing its energy offer development attempts.

Suggested Citation

  • Melo dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo & Nem Singh, Jewellord & Castro, Rui & Santos, Hugo & Costa, Hirdan Katarina de Medeiros & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2024. "SWOT analysis of Brazilian energy policy: A comparative panel data analysis of the twenty largest economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524001927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silva Neto, Jorge Vinicius & Gallo, Waldyr L.R., 2021. "Potential impacts of vinasse biogas replacing fossil oil for power generation, natural gas, and increasing sugarcane energy in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Betarelli, Admir Antonio & Domingues, Edson Paulo & Hewings, Geoffrey John Dennis, 2020. "Transport policy, rail freight sector and market structure: The economic effects in Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-23.
    3. Ferraz de Andrade Santos, José Alexandre & de Jong, Pieter & Alves da Costa, Caiuby & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2020. "Combining wind and solar energy sources: Potential for hybrid power generation in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Gaafar Muhammed & Neyre Tekbiyik-Ersoy, 2020. "Development of Renewable Energy in China, USA, and Brazil: A Comparative Study on Renewable Energy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Faria, Weslem Rodrigues & Gonçalves Montenegro, Rosa Livia & Bahia, Domitila Santos & Gonçalves, Eduardo, 2020. "Research and development, productive structure and economic effects: Assessing the role of public financing in Brazil," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 235-253.
    6. Proque, Andressa Lemes & dos Santos, Gervásio Ferreira & Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Larson, William D., 2020. "Effects of land use and transportation policies on the spatial distribution of urban energy consumption in Brazil," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Wilson Suzigan & Renato Garcia & Paulo Henrique Assis Feitosa, 2020. "Institutions and industrial policy in Brazil after two decades: have we built the needed institutions?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 799-813, October.
    8. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    9. Udemba, Edmund Ntom & Tosun, Merve, 2022. "Energy transition and diversification: A pathway to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    10. McAndrew, Ryan & Mulcahy, Rory & Gordon, Ross & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah, 2021. "Household energy efficiency interventions: A systematic literature review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Andreoni, Antonio & Tregenna, Fiona, 2020. "Escaping the middle-income technology trap: A comparative analysis of industrial policies in China, Brazil and South Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 324-340.
    12. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. de Oliveira Pinto Coelho, Eden & Aquila, Giancarlo & Bonatto, Benedito Donizeti & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro, 2021. "Regulatory impact of photovoltaic prosumer policies in Brazil based on a financial risk analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Ramírez-Cendrero, Juan M. & Paz, María J., 2017. "Oil fiscal regimes and national oil companies: A comparison between Pemex and Petrobras," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 473-483.
    15. Tolmasquim, Maurício T. & de Barros Correia, Tiago & Addas Porto, Natália & Kruger, Wikus, 2021. "Electricity market design and renewable energy auctions: The case of Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Kunofiwa Tsaurai & Lindiwe Ngcobo, 2020. "Renewable Energy Consumption, Education and Economic Growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 26-34.
    17. Nunes, Luis Eduardo & Lima, Marcus Vinicius Andrade de & Davison, Matthew & Leite, André Luis da Silva, 2021. "Switch and defer option in renewable energy projects: Evidences from Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    18. González, Mario Orestes Aguirre & Santiso, Andressa Medeiros & Melo, David Cassimiro de & Vasconcelos, Rafael Monteiro de, 2020. "Regulation for offshore wind power development in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Eliza Massi & Jewellord Nem Singh, 2018. "Industrial policy and state-making: Brazil’s attempt at oil-based industrial development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 1133-1150, June.
    20. Vieira, Bruno & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Sarto, Ewerson, 2021. "The effect of the addition of castor oil to residual soybean oil to obtain biodiesel in Brazil: Energy matrix diversification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 657-667.
    21. Barbosa, Luciana Gomes & Alves, Maria Alice Santos & Grelle, Carlos Eduardo Viveiros, 2021. "Actions against sustainability: Dismantling of the environmental policies in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine Wynn & Mingji Liu & Jasmine Cohen, 2022. "Quantifying the economy‐wide returns to innovation for Australia," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 591-614, September.
    2. Mardones, Cristian & Velásquez, Andrés, 2021. "Macroeconomic, intersectoral, and environmental effects of R&D subsidies in Chile: An input-output approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Víctor Dante Ayaviri-Nina & Andrés Alejandro Olmedo Falconi & Alba Isabel Maldonado Nunez & Edgar Anibal Rodriguez, 2024. "Impact of Renewable Electricity Consumption on the Economic Growth of Ecuador. Evidence from the Joint Cointegration Test," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 663-671, July.
    4. Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Faria, Weslem Rodrigues & Proque, Andressa Lemes & Perobelli, Fernando Salgueiro & de Almeida Vale, Vinicius, 2021. "COVID-19, public agglomerations and economic effects: Assessing the recovery time of passenger transport services in Brazil," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 254-272.
    5. Mensah, Emmanuel B. & Owusu, Solomon & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2023. "Productive efficiency, structural change, and catch-up within Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 78-100.
    6. Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Faria, Weslem Rodrigues & Gonçalves Montenegro, Rosa Livia & Bahia, Domitila Santos & Gonçalves, Eduardo, 2020. "Research and development, productive structure and economic effects: Assessing the role of public financing in Brazil," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 235-253.
    7. Abdoulganiour Almame Tinta & Salifou Ouedraogo & Noel Thiombiano, 2021. "Nexus between economic growth, financial development, and energy consumption in Sub‐Saharan African countries: A dynamic approach," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 366-379, November.
    8. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2016. "Unions, innovation and cross-country wage inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 104-118.
    10. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    11. Jeffrey Frankel, 2014. "Mauritius: African Success Story," NBER Chapters, in: African Successes, Volume IV: Sustainable Growth, pages 295-342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    13. Lutz Arnold & Christian Bauer, 2009. "On the growth and welfare effects of monopolistic distortions," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 19-40, May.
    14. Yew-Kwang Ng & Xiaokai Yang, 2005. "Specialization, Information, And Growth: A Sequential Equilibrium Analysis," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 20, pages 447-474, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Grimaud, Andre & Rouge, Luc, 2003. "Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations: optimum, equilibrium and economic policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 433-453, March.
    17. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    19. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Tung Liu & Kui-Wai Li, 2008. "Revisiting Solow’s Decomposition of Economic and Productivity Growth," Working Papers 200805, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2008.
    21. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524001927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.