IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9352-d618212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainable Community of Shared Future for Mankind: Origin, Evolution and Philosophical Foundation

Author

Listed:
  • Uzma Khan

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Huili Wang

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Ishraq Ali

    (Philosophy Department, School of Humanities, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

The Community of Shared Future for Mankind (CSFM) concept is a comprehensive Chinese proposal for a better future of mankind. In this article, we provide a comprehensive analysis of this concept by focusing on its origin, evolution and philosophical foundation. We show that the concept originated during the presidency of Hu Jintao, who initially used it for the domestic affairs of China. However, the usage of the concept was later extended from domestic to international affairs. Though Hu Jintao conceived the CSFM concept, it is president Xi Jinping who became its greatest advocate. We explore the CSFM concept’s development and evolution into one of the most influential, diverse and dominant concepts of international relations under president Xi. We argue that although CSFM concept is seen as a 21st century Chinese idea, the roots of the concept can be traced back to much earlier time in history. The concept is based on three major philosophical thoughts: Marxism, Confucianism and the philosophy of Mencius. We show that the CSFM concept is greatly influenced by Marx’s ideas such as the transformation of the world, the free association of producers, historical materialism and dialectics. We also point to a number of Confucian principles that are adopted by the CSFM concept. The CSFM concept not only adopts Confucian principles but also extends their scope from the individual level to international relations. Similarly, we also highlight that the CSFM concept is influenced by Mencius’ concepts such as universal brotherhood, responsibility towards the betterment of the world, humane governance, free trade, equal sharing of wealth and the conservation of natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Uzma Khan & Huili Wang & Ishraq Ali, 2021. "A Sustainable Community of Shared Future for Mankind: Origin, Evolution and Philosophical Foundation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9352-:d:618212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo, Sebastian, 2014. "International cooperation and development: a conceptual overview," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Haoguang Liang & Yaojun Zhang, 2019. "The Theoretical System of Belt and Road Initiative," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-7701-3, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaomu Li & Bin Wan & Yaping Yao & Te Bu & Ping Li & Yang Zhang, 2023. "Chinese Path to Sports Modernization: Fitness-for-All (Chinese) and a Development Model for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Nannan Ge & Enuo Wang & Yuan Li, 2023. "Foreign Language Education for Sustainable Development in China: A Case Study of German Language Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Shu Xu & Weimin Guo & Xinyi Wang & Zhaolian Xing, 2022. "Sustainable Relationship in Design: The Contribution Wisdom of Academies Landscape in Southern Jiangsu from an “Interpersonal View” Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uzma Khan & Huili Wang & Zhongliang Cui & Abida Begum & Abdullah Mohamed & Heesup Han, 2022. "The Philosophical Thought of Confucius and Mencius, and the Concept of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Zi-Miao Gao & Xiao-Guang Yue & Xiao-Jing Li, 2019. "Where Will the Future Be Heading Towards? A Book Review for “The Belt and Road Strategy in International Business and Administration”," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, August.
    3. Gonsior, Victoria & Klingebiel, Stephan, 2019. "The development policy system under pressure: acknowledging limitations, sourcing advantages and moving towards a broader perspective," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Lin Zhu & Xiaoming Li & Yao Huang & Fangyuan Liu & Chengji Yang & Dongyang Li & Hongpeng Bai, 2023. "Digital Technology and Green Development in Manufacturing: Evidence from China and 20 Other Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2018. "Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 21/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Yiming Li & Liru Bai, 2024. "Analyzing Green Growth Efficiency in China and Investigating the Spatial Effects of Fiscal Decentralization: Case Study of Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. KR Koralage, 2024. "Reinterpreting Degrowth: Addressing Historical Inequalities and Sustainable Development in the Global South with a Special focus on Sri Lanka," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 4400-4414, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9352-:d:618212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.