IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v55y2024i6p1230-1258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The International and Local Politics of the Rural Environmental Registry: Brazil's Green Currency

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Horn

Abstract

Since the 2000s, rural elites have engaged in ‘greening’ the Amazon extractive frontier. Private and state‐led initiatives have consolidated the agro‐industrial system by incentivizing compliance and effectively legalizing deforestation. Brazil's Rural Environmental Registry (Cadastro Ambiental Rural — CAR) is fundamental to ‘sustainable producer’ initiatives and international and local carbon markets. Since its emergence at the end of the 1990s, it has been funded and promoted by European countries and the World Bank through the G7 Pilot Programme for the Conservation of Brazilian Rainforests and the Amazon Fund. This analysis draws on a critical political economy approach and several years of multi‐site interviews, participant observation and archival research to illuminate how donor and recipient agencies have sustained territorial and georeferencing technologies as an international state project to enable the green economy, despite political shifts and the inherent contradictions of this instrument. The article shows how ecological modernization technologies enable the ‘greening’ of agro‐industry expansion while exacerbating land conflicts and marginalizing Indigenous and traditional peoples’ collective land rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Horn, 2024. "The International and Local Politics of the Rural Environmental Registry: Brazil's Green Currency," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(6), pages 1230-1258, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:55:y:2024:i:6:p:1230-1258
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12863
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Ekers & Scott Prudham, 2018. "The Socioecological Fix: Fixed Capital, Metabolism, and Hegemony," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(1), pages 17-34, January.
    2. Horn, Claudia, 2023. "Brazil's Amazon Fund: a "green fix" between offset pressures and deforestation crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118136, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Roger Merino, 2020. "The cynical state: forging extractivism, neoliberalism and development in governmental spaces," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 58-76, January.
    5. Belén Fernández Milmanda, 2023. "Harvesting Influence: Agrarian Elites and Democracy in Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 51(1), pages 135-161, March.
    6. Murat Arsel & Bram Büscher, 2012. "Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market-based Environmental Policy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 53-78, January.
    7. Ulrich Brand & Christoph G?rg, 2013. "Regimes in Global Environmental Governance and the Internationalization of the State: The Case of Biodiversity Politics," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 110-122, April.
    8. Lima, Mendelson & Silva Junior, Carlos Antonio da & Rausch, Lisa & Gibbs, Holly K. & Johann, Jerry Adriani, 2019. "Demystifying sustainable soy in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 349-352.
    9. Ritaumaria Pereira & Cynthia S. Simmons & Robert Walker, 2016. "Smallholders, Agrarian Reform, and Globalization in the Brazilian Amazon: Cattle versus the Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinru Li & Zengrui Tian & Qian Liu & Beiquan Chang, 2025. "The Impact and Mechanisms of State-Owned Shareholding on Greenwashing Behaviors in Chinese A-Share Private Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Cusworth & Jennifer Dodsworth, 2021. "Using the ‘good farmer’ concept to explore agricultural attitudes to the provision of public goods. A case study of participants in an English agri-environment scheme," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 929-941, December.
    2. van der Hoff, Richard & Rajão, Raoni & Leroy, Pieter & Boezeman, Daan, 2015. "The parallel materialization of REDD+ implementation discourses in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 37-45.
    3. Cameron White, 2016. "The conditions of practical action: Neoliberalism and sustainability in the Australian road construction industry," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1501-1515, December.
    4. Muradian, Roldan & Cahyafitri, Raras & Ferrando, Tomaso & Grottera, Carolina & Jardim-Wanderley, Luiz & Krause, Torsten & Kurniawan, Nanang I. & Loft, Lasse & Nurshafira, Tadzkia & Prabawati-Suwito, D, 2025. "Will the EU deforestation-free products regulation (EUDR) reduce tropical forest loss? Insights from three producer countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Reginaldo Carvalho Santos & Carlos Antonio Silva Junior & Leandro Denis Battirola & Mendelson Lima, 2022. "Importance of legislation for maintaining forests on private properties in the Brazilian Cerrado," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3356-3370, March.
    6. Beatriz M. Pereira & Marlon V. Brisola, 2024. "Techno-economic Evolution of Soybean Production in Brazil and Argentina," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(8), pages 145-145, April.
    7. Orihuela, José Carlos & Mendieta, Arturo & Pérez, Carlos & Ramírez, Tania, 2021. "From paper institutions to bureaucratic autonomy: Institutional change as a resource curse remedy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, Rafaela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Burns, Georgette Leah & Ross, Helen & Biggs, Duan, 2024. "‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Chambers, Josephine M. & Massarella, Kate & Fletcher, Robert, 2022. "The right to fail? Problematizing failure discourse in international conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss & Corbera, Esteve & Lapeyre, Renaud, 2019. "Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 434-443.
    11. Joel Henrique Ellwanger & Carlos Afonso Nobre & José Artur Bogo Chies, 2022. "Brazilian Biodiversity as a Source of Power and Sustainable Development: A Neglected Opportunity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Singh, Neera M., 2015. "Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 53-61.
    13. Magalhães, Iara Barbosa & Pereira, Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula & Calijuri, Maria Lucia & Alves, Sabrina do Carmo & Santos, Vitor Juste dos & Lorentz, Juliana Ferreira, 2020. "Brazilian Cerrado and Soy moratorium: Effects on biome preservation and consequences on grain production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Prevost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey & Michelot, Agnès, 2016. "Économie politique des services écosystémiques : de l’analyse économique aux évolutions juridiques," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 19.
    15. Christoph Görg & Ulrich Brand & Helmut Haberl & Diana Hummel & Thomas Jahn & Stefan Liehr, 2017. "Challenges for Social-Ecological Transformations: Contributions from Social and Political Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Caela O'Connell & Marzieh Motallebi & Deanna L. Osmond & Dana L. K. Hoag, 2017. "Trading on risk: The moral logics and economic reasoning of North Carolina farmers in water quality trading markets," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 225-238, June.
    17. Cahill-Webb, Finn, 2018. "International environmental governance and the Paris agreement on climate change: The adoption of the "pledge and review" governance approach," IPE Working Papers 99/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    18. Beacham, Austin & Hafner-Burton, Emilie M & Schneider, Christina J, 2024. "Climate Change, Political Conflict, and Democratic Resilience," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt4wd7x7jv, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    19. Morello, Thiago Fonseca & Piketty, Marie-Gabrielle & Gardner, Toby & Parry, Luke & Barlow, Jos & Ferreira, Joice & Tancredi, Nicola S., 2018. "Fertilizer Adoption by Smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: Farm-level Evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 278-291.
    20. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:55:y:2024:i:6:p:1230-1258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.