IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3484-d1067960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Patent Bibliometric Analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Yaozong Zhu

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Yezhu Wang

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Baohuan Zhou

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Xiaoli Hu

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Yundong Xie

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China)

Abstract

Large amounts of CO 2 from human socioeconomic activities threaten environmental sustainability. Moreover, uncontrolled resource use and lack of relevant technology exacerbate this issue. For this reason, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology has gained worldwide attention. Many scholars have researched CCUS, but few have used CCUS patent bibliometric analysis from a unified perspective. This article aims to provide a conclusive analysis for CCUS researchers and policymakers, as well as summarize the innovation trends, technological distribution, and topic evolution. Based on 11,915 pieces of patent data from the Derwent Innovations Index, we used bibliometric analysis and data mining methods to conduct research on four dimensions: overall trend, geographical distribution, patentees, and patent content. The results of this article are as follows. CCUS has entered a rapid development stage since 2013. Patents are mainly distributed geographically in China, the US, and Japan, especially in heavy industries such as energy and electricity. Large enterprises hold patents with a relatively stable network of cooperators and attach great importance to international patent protection. A total of 12 topics were identified through clustering, and these topics gradually shifted from technicalities to commercialization, and from industrial production to all aspects of people’s daily lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaozong Zhu & Yezhu Wang & Baohuan Zhou & Xiaoli Hu & Yundong Xie, 2023. "A Patent Bibliometric Analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3484-:d:1067960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc, 2022. "Changes in Energy Sector Strategies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-cui & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2021. "Observing technology reserves of carbon capture and storage via patent data: Paving the way for carbon neutral," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Muhammad Nawaz & Humbul Suleman & Abdulhalim Shah Maulud, 2022. "Carbon Capture and Utilization: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2007–2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Xi Yang & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Preventing Patent Risks in Artificial Intelligence Industry for Sustainable Development: A Multi-Level Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Guiyang Zhang & Chaoying Tang & Yong Qi, 2020. "Alliance Network Diversity and Innovation Ambidexterity: The Differential Roles of Industrial Diversity, Geographical Diversity, and Functional Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Kaihan Yang & Ai Chin Thoo, 2023. "Visualising the Knowledge Domain of Reverse Logistics and Sustainability Performance: Scientometric Mapping Based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Fan, Ruilin & Zhang, Hanlu & Gao, Yi, 2023. "The global cooperation in asteroid mining based on AHP, entropy and TOPSIS," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    9. Cristiano Ziegler & Tiago Sinigaglia & Mario Eduardo Santos Martins & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2021. "Technological Advances to Reduce Apis mellifera Mortality: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Míguez, José Luis & Porteiro, Jacobo & Pérez-Orozco, Raquel & Patiño, David & Gómez, Miguel Ángel, 2020. "Biological systems for CCS: Patent review as a criterion for technological development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    11. Honglei Lu & Chunxiao Zhu & Xin Cao & Yen Hsu, 2022. "The Sustainability Evaluation of Masks Based on the Integrated Rank Sum Ratio and Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    13. Latifah M. Alsarhan & Alhanouf S. Alayyar & Naif B. Alqahtani & Nezar H. Khdary, 2021. "Circular Carbon Economy (CCE): A Way to Invest CO 2 and Protect the Environment, a Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Choi, Hyunhong & Woo, JongRoul, 2022. "Investigating emerging hydrogen technology topics and comparing national level technological focus: Patent analysis using a structural topic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    15. Yujia Zhang & Zuwang Chu & Dongdong Song, 2022. "Review of the Law Popularizing Education on Administrative Compulsion in Response to Major Epidemic Situations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Muaz Niazi & Amir Hussain, 2011. "Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 479-499, November.
    17. Dongdong Song & Tong Jiang & Chuanping Rao, 2022. "Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Régis Briday & Sébastien Chailleux & Xavier Arnauld Sartre, 2024. "The complex challenges and opportunities of the industrial and energy sectors (IESs) in the time of climate politics: carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) in France as a case study," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 151-177, August.
    2. Quan Cheng & Jing Yang, 2023. "Allocation and Evolution of Government Attention in China’s Electric Power Industry: An Analysis Based on Policy Text," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Sebastian Szymon Grzesiak & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Electromobility: Logistics and Business Ecosystem Perspectives Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Dongdong Song & Jing Rui, 2023. "Research on Legal Promotion Mechanism of Biomass Energy Development under “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” Targets in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Mariusz Starzec & Michał Wojtoń & Daniel Słyś, 2023. "Greywater as a Future Sustainable Energy and Water Source: Bibliometric Mapping of Current Knowledge and Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-34, January.
    4. Hu, Maomao & Xiao, Fu & Wang, Shengwei, 2021. "Neighborhood-level coordination and negotiation techniques for managing demand-side flexibility in residential microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Green Jobs: Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    7. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    9. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.
    10. Ping Xie, 2015. "Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document co-citation visualization analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 611-622, October.
    11. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    12. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    14. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Urša Golob & Mark A. P. Davies & Joachim Kernstock & Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Trending topics plus future challenges and opportunities in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 123-129, March.
    16. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    18. Sardorbek Musayev & Jonathan Mellor & Tara Walsh & Emmanouil Anagnostou, 2021. "Development of an Agent-Based Model for Weather Forecast Information Exchange in Rural Area of Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    19. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    20. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3484-:d:1067960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.