IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3287-d1064826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game of Digital-Driven Photovoltaic–Storage–Use Value Chain Collaboration: A Value Intelligence Creation Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jicheng Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiakang Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Mengyu Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

In the context of “carbon neutral”, distributed energy, including photovoltaic power generation and energy storage systems, is developing rapidly. Meanwhile, the new generation of information technology, such as “Cloud computing, Big data, the Internet of things, Mobile Internet, AI, Blockchain”, is driving the digital transformation of the energy industry. Under digital drive, how the agents in the photovoltaic–storage–use value chain collaborate and create value intelligently is a question worthy of deep consideration. Firstly, the value creation mechanism and collaborative process of the digital-driven photovoltaic–storage–use value chain are analyzed from a value intelligence creation perspective. Secondly, the tripartite evolutionary game model of photovoltaic power generator, energy storage provider and user is established. Finally, the influencing factors of digital- driven photovoltaic–storage–use value chain collaboration are explored through a numerical simulation, and management suggestions are put forward. The study finds the following: (1) The behavior choice of each agent in the value chain will affect the decision of other agents. In particular, the photovoltaic power generator has a great influence on the cooperative willingness of other agents. To promote value chain collaboration, the guiding role of the photovoltaic power generator should be fully realized. (2) Agents on the value chain can use a variety of digital technologies to improve enabling benefits, which is conducive to promoting value chain collaboration. (3) The driving costs and potential risks are obstacles for value chain collaboration. Cost reduction and risk prevention are effective ways to improve the willingness of collaboration. (4) Reasonable incentive compensation mechanisms and information asymmetry punishment measures are the keys to enhancing collective willingness. This research provides theoretical support for photovoltaic–storage–use value chain collaboration from a value intelligence creation perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Yu & Jicheng Liu & Jiakang Sun & Mengyu Shi, 2023. "Evolutionary Game of Digital-Driven Photovoltaic–Storage–Use Value Chain Collaboration: A Value Intelligence Creation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3287-:d:1064826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alizadeh Bidgoli, Mohsen & Ahmadian, Ali, 2022. "Multi-stage optimal scheduling of multi-microgrids using deep-learning artificial neural network and cooperative game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    2. Chang, Hsiu-Chuan & Ghaddar, Bissan & Nathwani, Jatin, 2022. "Shared community energy storage allocation and optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    3. Zulfiqar, M. & Kamran, M. & Rasheed, M.B., 2022. "A blockchain-enabled trust aware energy trading framework using games theory and multi-agent system in smat grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Ting Zhang & Shuaishuai Cao & Lingying Pan & Chenyu Zhou, 2020. "A Policy Effect Analysis of China’s Energy Storage Development Based on a Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    5. Kyungtae Kim & Sungjoo Lee, 2018. "How Can Big Data Complement Expert Analysis? A Value Chain Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Masoud Emamian & Aref Eskandari & Mohammadreza Aghaei & Amir Nedaei & Amirmohammad Moradi Sizkouhi & Jafar Milimonfared, 2022. "Cloud Computing and IoT Based Intelligent Monitoring System for Photovoltaic Plants Using Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Abid, Hamza & Thakur, Jagruti & Khatiwada, Dilip & Bauner, David, 2021. "Energy storage integration with solar PV for increased electricity access: A case study of Burkina Faso," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Nguyen, Thi Ngoc & Müsgens, Felix, 2022. "What drives the accuracy of PV output forecasts?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    9. Oliver Hart, 2017. "Incomplete Contracts and Control," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1731-1752, July.
    10. Yin, Yu & Liu, Jicheng, 2022. "Risk assessment of photovoltaic - Energy storage utilization project based on improved Cloud-TODIM in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Dafit Bagus Maha Bekti & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi & Arif S. Budiman & I Made Putra Loka Mandala & Angga Ranggana Putra & Satria Fadil Persada & Reny Nadlifatin & Michael Naya, 2021. "Determining Factors Affecting Customer Intention to Use Rooftop Solar Photovoltaics in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Fang, Yujuan & Wei, Wei & Mei, Shengwei, 2022. "How dynamic renewable portfolio standards impact the diffusion of renewable energy in China? A networked evolutionary game analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 778-788.
    13. Liu, Jicheng & Lin, Xiangmin, 2019. "Empirical analysis and strategy suggestions on the value-added capacity of photovoltaic industry value chain in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 356-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Yu & Jicheng Liu & Yajing Wen & Xue Yu, 2023. "Economic Optimal Coordinated Dispatch of Power for Community Users Considering Shared Energy Storage and Demand Response under Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria A. Franco & Stefan N. Groesser, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Solar Photovoltaic Value Chain for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-35, August.
    2. Cui, Shiting & Zhu, Ruijin & Wu, Jun, 2024. "A double layer energy cooperation framework for prosumer groups in high altitude areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Baoling Zou & Biliang Luo, 2018. "Why the Uncertain Term Occurs in the Farmland Lease Market: Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Ning, Jiajun & Xiong, Lixin, 2024. "Analysis of the dynamic evolution process of the digital transformation of renewable energy enterprises based on the cooperative and evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Sun, Bo & Fan, Boyang & Zhang, Yifan & Xie, Jingdong, 2023. "Investment decisions and strategies of China's energy storage technology under policy uncertainty: A real options approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    6. Kim, Yoonha, 2021. "Linking theories of incomplete contracts to empirics in IPO contracting," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    7. Michela Arnaboldi, 2018. "The Missing Variable in Big Data for Social Sciences: The Decision-Maker," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Olivier Meier & Aurélie Sannajust, 0. "The smart contract revolution: a solution for the holdup problem?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    9. Byun, Seong, 2022. "The role of intrinsic incentives and corporate culture in motivating innovation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Ioannis Bournakis & Sotiris Papaioannou & Marina Papanastassiou, 2022. "Multinationals and domestic total factor productivity: Competition effects, knowledge spillovers and foreign ownership," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(12), pages 3715-3750, December.
    11. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref, 2018. "Asymmetric information and heterogeneous effects of R&D subsidies: evidence on R&D investment and employment of R&D personel," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 21943, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    12. Diyun Huang & Dirk Van Hertem, 2018. "Cross-Border Electricity Transmission Network Investment: Perspective and Risk Framework of Third Party Investors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Ioan Cristian Hoarcă & Nicu Bizon & Ioan Sorin Șorlei & Phatiphat Thounthong, 2023. "Sizing Design for a Hybrid Renewable Power System Using HOMER and iHOGA Simulators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Alessandro Morselli, 2021. "Rationality, Information Power and Institutional Theory," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 12(2).
    15. Sara L. McGaughey & Pascalis Raimondos & Lisbeth La Cour, 2018. "What is a Foreign Firm? Implications for Productivity Spillovers," CESifo Working Paper Series 7109, CESifo.
    16. Wang Lai Wang & Marek Kryszak, 2020. "Technological Progress and Supply Base under Uncertain Market Conditions: The Case Study of the Taiwanese c-Si Solar Industry 2016–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Liu, Zhouding & Nazari-Heris, Morteza, 2023. "Optimal bidding strategy of multi-carrier systems in electricity markets using information gap decision theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    18. Gabriele Volpato & Gianluca Carraro & Enrico Dal Cin & Sergio Rech, 2024. "On the Different Fair Allocations of Economic Benefits for Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Wang, Delu & Li, Chunxiao & Mao, Jinqi & Yang, Qing, 2023. "What affects the implementation of the renewable portfolio standard? An analysis of the four-party evolutionary game," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 250-261.
    20. Kerscher, Selina & Koirala, Arpan & Arboleya, Pablo, 2024. "Grid-optimal energy community planning from a systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3287-:d:1064826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.