IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2716-d1055613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Search of Sustainability and Financial Returns: The Case of ESG Energy Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Jekaterina Kuzmina

    (Department of Economics and Finance, BA School of Business and Finance, Kr. Valdemara 161, LV-1013 Riga, Latvia)

  • Dzintra Atstaja

    (Faculty of Law, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Maris Purvins

    (Department of Management, BA School of Business and Finance, Kr. Valdemara 161, LV-1013 Riga, Latvia)

  • Guram Baakashvili

    (Faculty of Business and Technologies, Business and Technology University, 82 Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue, 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Vakhtang Chkareuli

    (Faculty of Business and Technologies, Business and Technology University, 82 Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue, 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia)

Abstract

The world is facing several challenges, and the problem of sustainable development is one of the most important. It is worth considering that European countries are playing a significant role as pioneers in building a sustainable world, such as those promises made by signing the Paris Agreement and European Taxonomy. To achieve ambitious targets within sustainable development, a huge amount of capital is necessary, while financial and capital market participants are expected to demonstrate a high level of engagement in the domain of sustainability. Facing growing interest and demand, a relatively new product—the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investment fund—was introduced. Scientific literature is providing some controversial views regarding the overall evaluation of this product. Therefore, additional research providing different angles would contribute to a better understanding. This study examines European ESG funds in the energy sector, from the perspective of news flows and investors. It is worth noting that the authors use the word “European” to refer to members of the European Union (EU). The paper consists of the following parts. In the introduction, the current state of this issue is discussed. The following section offers a literature review and a news flow analysis that contributes to a deeper understanding of these issues. A description of the methodology applied for the data analysis follows this, and the final section presents the research results and conclusions. The authors apply statistical analysis and the Carhart model to determine the differences in the performance of the ESG and conventional funds and use their own tool for text analysis to examine the relevance of the topic of ESG to attract client interest. The authors claim that the performance of the European ESG equity funds do not show a statistically significant difference from the non-ESG equity funds in the majority of the periods examined. The application of the adjusted Carhart model demonstrates that the factor of sustainability has a non-significant and negative effect on the fund performance. Finally, the authors highlight the urgent necessity for the unified usage of keywords and terminology, such as “ESG”, “sustainability”, etc., to ensure comparison and attribution possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jekaterina Kuzmina & Dzintra Atstaja & Maris Purvins & Guram Baakashvili & Vakhtang Chkareuli, 2023. "In Search of Sustainability and Financial Returns: The Case of ESG Energy Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2716-:d:1055613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Durán-Santomil & Luis Otero-González & Renato Heitor Correia-Domingues & Juan Carlos Reboredo, 2019. "Does Sustainability Score Impact Mutual Fund Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Ilze Zumente & Nataļja Lāce, 2021. "ESG Rating—Necessity for the Investor or the Company?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    4. Christopher C Geczy & Robert F Stambaugh & David Levin, 2021. "Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds [Should investors avoid all actively managed mutual funds? A study in Bayesian performance evaluation]," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 11(2), pages 309-351.
    5. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    6. Das, Nandita & Chatterje, Swarn & Ruf, Bernadette & Sunder, Aman, 2018. "ESG Ratings and the Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: A Panel Study," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 49-57.
    7. Tiago Gonçalves & Diego Pimentel & Cristina Gaio, 2021. "Risk and Performance of European Green and Conventional Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark & Serebriakova, Alexandra, 2021. "Finance in global transition scenarios: Mapping investments by technology into finance needs by source," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Guizhou Liu & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2020. "Can One Reinforce Investments in Renewable Energy Stock Indices with the ESG Index?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark, 2020. "How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Adrian Fernandez-Perez & Alexandre Garel & Ivan Indriawan, 2022. "In the mood for sustainable funds?," Post-Print hal-03713869, HAL.
    12. Hanna Silvola & Tiina Landau, 2021. "Global Investment Trends and Impacts on Sustainable Investing," Springer Books, in: Sustainable Investing, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 231-237, Springer.
    13. Geddes, Anna & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2020. "Integrating finance into the multi-level perspective: Technology niche-finance regime interactions and financial policy interventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    14. Fernandez-Perez, Adrian & Garel, Alexandre & Indriawan, Ivan, 2022. "In the mood for sustainable funds?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    16. Raphael Bointner & Simon Pezzutto & Gianluca Grilli & Wolfram Sparber, 2016. "Financing Innovations for the Renewable Energy Transition in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy E. & Davis, Mark E. & Holstenkamp, Lars, 2018. "Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 772-780.
    18. Aneesh Raghunandan & Shiva Rajgopal, 2022. "Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 822-863, September.
    19. Gbenga Ibikunle & Tom Steffen, 2017. "European Green Mutual Fund Performance: A Comparative Analysis with their Conventional and Black Peers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 337-355, October.
    20. Gregor Dorfleitner & Christian Kreuzer & Christian Sparrer, 2020. "ESG controversies and controversial ESG: about silent saints and small sinners," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 393-412, September.
    21. Claudia Kemfert & Dorothea Schäfer & Willi Semmler, 2020. "Great Green Transition and Finance," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(3), pages 181-186, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel N. F. Plattek & Otávio H. S. Figueiredo, 2023. "Sustainable and Governance Investment Funds in Brazil: A Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Mantas Svazas & Yuriy Bilan & Valentinas Navickas & Małgorzata Okręglicka, 2023. "Energy Transformation in Municipal Areas—Key Datasets and Their Influence on Process Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Vakhtang Chkareuli & Gvantsa Darguashvili & Dzintra Atstaja & Rozita Susniene, 2024. "Assessing the Financial Viability and Sustainability of Circular Business Models in the Wine Industry: A Comparative Analysis to Traditional Linear Business Model—Case of Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Łukasz Dopierała & Magdalena Mosionek-Schweda & Daria Ilczuk, 2020. "Does the Asset Allocation Policy Affect the Performance of Climate-Themed Funds? Empirical Evidence from the Scandinavian Mutual Funds Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Juan C. Reboredo & Luis A. Otero González, 2022. "Low carbon transition risk in mutual fund portfolios: Managerial involvement and performance effects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 950-968, March.
    5. Miralles-Quirós, José Luis & Miralles-Quirós, María Mar, 2024. "Factor models and investment strategies in the renewable energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Yundan Guo & Li Shen, 2023. "Commercial Retirement FOFs in China: Investment and Persistence Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Pablo Solórzano-Taborga & Ana Belén Alonso-Conde & Javier Rojo-Suárez, 2020. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Multifactor Asset Pricing Models," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Igor Kravchuk, 2022. "Performance of Equity Fund Investment Strategies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Vu Le Tran & Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "ESG news spillovers across the value chain," Post-Print hal-04325746, HAL.
    10. Amparo Soler-Domínguez & Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Diego Víctor de Mingo-López & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2020. "Social responsible mutual funds and lowcarbon economy," Working Papers 2020/15, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    11. Federica Ielasi & Monica Rossolini, 2019. "Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Eun, Cheol & Lee, Kyuseok & Wei, Fengrong, 2023. "Dual role of the country factors in international asset pricing: The local factors and proxies for the global factors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Andrea Flori & Fabrizio Lillo & Fabio Pammolli & Alessandro Spelta, 2021. "Better to stay apart: asset commonality, bipartite network centrality, and investment strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 177-213, April.
    16. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    17. Chue, Timothy K. & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2019. "Aggregate investor sentiment and stock return synchronicity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Vanessa Serrano & Francesc Prior & Jordi Cuadros, 2023. "Analysis of an event study using the Fama–French five-factor model: teaching approaches including spreadsheets and the R programming language," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    19. Bradrania, Reza & Veron, Jose Francisco, 2023. "The beta anomaly in the Australian stock market and the lottery demand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Bakalli, Gaetan & Guerrier, Stéphane & Scaillet, Olivier, 2023. "A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2716-:d:1055613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.