IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2654-d1054529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Business Model of Modern Enterprises in Conditions of Uncertainty and Turbulence

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Pimenowa

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Serhii Pimenov

    (Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Halyna Fyliuk

    (Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Maksym W. Sitnicki

    (Management of Innovation and Investment Activities Department, Faculty of Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Vasylyna Kolosha

    (Department of Economic Theory, Macro- and Microeconomics, Faculty of Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Dmytro Kurinskyi

    (Management of Innovation and Investment Activities Department, Faculty of Economics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the impact of the openness of a company to stakeholders on the effectiveness of the business model of the enterprise. The hypothesis. We believe that conducting a socially responsible business, i.e., disclosing non-financial information about the activities of enterprises, leads to the improvement of their financial indicators and is therefore evidence of a more effective implementation of their business models. Methods of the study. The following methods were used in the study: analysis and synthesis, comparative, induction and deduction, scientific abstraction, decomposition and logical generalizations in the analysis of scientific literature; computational–analytical, diagnostic, tabular and economic–statistical methods to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of business models of enterprises; diagnostic, statistical, index, method of expert assessments and rating to assess the corporate sustainability and transparency of enterprises; the use of the method of integrated indicators allowed the grouping of enterprises by classes of efficiency of business models, corporate sustainability and transparency. According to results of the study, it was determined that an effective business model is formed on the basis of maximum transparency and corporate sustainability in conditions of unpredictability and instability of the external environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Pimenowa & Serhii Pimenov & Halyna Fyliuk & Maksym W. Sitnicki & Vasylyna Kolosha & Dmytro Kurinskyi, 2023. "Sustainable Business Model of Modern Enterprises in Conditions of Uncertainty and Turbulence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2654-:d:1054529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justyna Dyduch & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Empirical Study of Polish Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Oksana Seroka‐Stolka & Kamil Fijorek, 2020. "Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Proactive environmental strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of firm size," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2338-2354, September.
    3. Maryam Mahmoodi & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Features and Challenges of Agritourism: Evidence from Iran and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2021. "Assessment of Spatial Diversity of the Potential of the Natural Environment in the Context of Sustainable Development of Poviats in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Halyna Fyliuk & Kateryna Akulenko, 2018. "Methodological Principles Of Evaluation Of Investment Attractiveness Of The Enterprise," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    6. Nataliia Butenko & Liudmyla Kot, 2019. "Methodological Approaches To The Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Partnership Relations," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(4).
    7. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, K. Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2020. "Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lubov Moldavan & Olena Pimenowa & Mirosław Wasilewski & Natalia Wasilewska, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Agriculture of Ukraine in the Context of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lubov Moldavan & Olena Pimenowa & Mirosław Wasilewski & Natalia Wasilewska, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Agriculture of Ukraine in the Context of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Silvia Cantele & Chiara Leardini & Luca Piubello Orsini, 2023. "Impactful B Corps: A configurational approach of organizational factors leading to high sustainability performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1104-1120, May.
    3. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Bablu Kumar Dhar & Sabrina Maria Sarkar & Foster K. Ayittey, 2022. "Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: A study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 71-78, January.
    5. Adriana TIRON-TUDOR & Teodora Viorica FĂRCAŞ & Ioana DRAGU & Ecaterina Monica MOISE, 2020. "Non-Financial Reporting in Romania in the pre-Directive 2014/95/EU Period (1990-2013)," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 1(5), pages 63-72, May.
    6. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    7. Jeremy Galbreath & Chia‐Yang Chang & Daniel Tisch, 2023. "The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5420-5434, December.
    8. Nguyen Thi Canh & Nguyen Thanh Liem & Phung Anh Thu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2019. "The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, July.
    9. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Rosselyn Pacheco & Elizabete Monteiro & Carolina Santos, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Sangita Choudhary & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Simon Peter Nadeem, 2020. "The adoption of environmentally sustainable supply chain management: Measuring the relative effectiveness of hard dimensions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3104-3122, December.
    11. Garstecki Dawid & Kowalczyk Magdalena & Kwiecińska Karolina, 2019. "CSR Practices in Polish and Spanish Stock Listed Companies: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Mayo Fuster Morell & Ricard Espelt & Enric Senabre Hidalgo, 2021. "Data for Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections between Platform Models and Sustainable Development Goals," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Dalia Streimikiene & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategies: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry of Asian Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Johan Du Plessis & Wouter Bam, 2018. "Comparing the Sustainable Development Potential of Industries: A Role for Sustainability Disclosures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, March.
    15. Ali Saeed Almuflih & Janpriy Sharma & Mohit Tyagi & Arvind Bhardwaj & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Nawaf Khan, 2022. "Leveraging the Dynamics of Food Supply Chains towards Avenues of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    17. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici & Umberto Sagliaschi, 2018. "Sustainability Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Does It Matter to Investors? A Cheap Talk Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    18. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    20. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2654-:d:1054529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.