IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2351-d1048627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Influencing Mechanism of the Effect of Brands’ Sustainable Behaviors on Consumer Attitudes: An Empirical Study on Clothing Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Yiling Zhang

    (School of International Education, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Ying Zhou

    (School of Design and Art, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng City 224001, China)

  • Yangyang Liu

    (School of Art and Design, Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Zengrui Xiao

    (School of International Education, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Brands often link themselves with sustainable behavior in brand content marketing to obtain more consumer recognition. However, in fact, in the communication between brands and consumers, consumers cannot effectively respond to any sustainable behaviors of clothing brands other than the sustainable behavior of materials. This results in failure to stimulate the expression of deep culture, which then affects the long-term development of clothing brands. This study integrates material space benefit and spiritual space empathy as the intermediary role, aiming to explore the impact of brand sustainable behaviors on consumer brand attitude from the perspective of consumers. The data come from interviews with 12 experts, and 314 useable responses were collected (34.08% male and 65.92% female). Through in-depth interview, coding, and category analysis, we obtain dimensions of brand sustainable behaviors and a hypothetical model of relationship between brand behavior and consumer attitudes. We then use Amos software to quantify and demonstrate the mechanism of action between variables in the model. Research results show that: (1) Brand sustainable behaviors that have significant impact on brand attitude can be divided into three dimensions, which are product long-life design, cultural inheritance and reconstruction, and fashion digital empowerment. (2) Product long-life design has a significant direct effect on material space benefit; cultural inheritance and reconstruction significantly affect spiritual space empathy; fashion digital empowerment significantly affects material space benefit and spiritual space empathy. (3) Material space benefit and spiritual space empathy play a mediating role in the impact of brand sustainable behaviors on consumer attitudes, and the effect of spiritual space empathy on consumer brand attitudes has a high validity. The findings offer suggestions for sustainable strategies and content marketing of clothing brands, promotes effective communication between brands and consumers at the sustainable level, and help brands practice sustainability in normalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiling Zhang & Ying Zhou & Yangyang Liu & Zengrui Xiao, 2023. "Research on the Influencing Mechanism of the Effect of Brands’ Sustainable Behaviors on Consumer Attitudes: An Empirical Study on Clothing Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2351-:d:1048627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erminia D’Itria & Chiara Colombi, 2022. "Biobased Innovation as a Fashion and Textile Design Must: A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Chih-Chun Lai & Ching-Erh Chang, 2021. "A Study on Sustainable Design for Indigo Dyeing Color in the Visual Aspect of Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Seung-hye Jung & Joon-ho Kim & Ha-na Cho & Hae-won Lee & Hyun-ju Choi, 2021. "Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Zhuming Bi, 2011. "Revisiting System Paradigms from the Viewpoint of Manufacturing Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Patrina Whyte & Geoffrey Lamberton, 2020. "Conceptualising Sustainability Using a Cognitive Mapping Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Jinsoo Hwang & Jawad Abbas & Kyuhyeon Joo & Seung-Woo Choo & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2022. "The Effects of Types of Service Providers on Experience Economy, Brand Attitude, and Brand Loyalty in the Restaurant Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Namhee Yoon & Ha Kyung Lee & Ho Jung Choo, 2020. "Fast Fashion Avoidance Beliefs and Anti-Consumption Behaviors: The Cases of Korea and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Sophie Urmetzer & Michael P. Schlaile & Kristina B. Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Andreas Pyka, 2018. "Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleanor Kohler & Emmanuel Mogaji & İsmail Erkan, 2023. "Save the Trip to the Store: Sustainable Shopping, Electronic Word of Mouth on Instagram and the Impact on Cosmetic Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venkatesh Shankar & Pablo Azar & Matthew Fuller, 2008. "—: A Multicategory Brand Equity Model and Its Application at Allstate," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 567-584, 07-08.
    2. Tohru Yoshioka-Kobayashi & Tomofumi Miyanoshita & Daisuke Kanama, 2020. "Revisiting incremental product innovations in the food-manufacturing industry: an empirical study on the effect of intellectual property rights," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Kim, Sang-Joon & Bae, John & Oh, Hannah, 2019. "Financing strategically: The moderation effect of marketing activities on the bifurcated relationship between debt level and firm valuation of small and medium enterprises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 663-681.
    4. Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri, 2021. "Using Conceptual Mapping for Learning to Affect Students’ Motivation and Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Bae, John & Kim, Sang-Joon & Oh, Hannah, 2017. "Taming polysemous signals: The role of marketing intensity on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 29-40.
    6. Cristina Moreira & Ana Côrte-Real & Paulo Lencastre, 2010. "The image of Agriculture in Portugal," Working Papers de Gestão (Management Working Papers) 04, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    7. Stefan Buehler & Daniel Halbheer, 2011. "Selling when Brand Image Matters," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(1), pages 102-118, March.
    8. Vlad I. Rosca & Cristina Veronica Partenie, 2018. "A theoretical overview on understanding customer-based brand equity," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 19-28.
    9. Adeoye, I.A. & Ayodele, O.E. & Adesuyi, I.O & Ayo, M.F, 2021. "Brand Association and Sales Growth: The Flour Milling Industry Experience," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(7), pages 727-731, July.
    10. Yoshida, Masayuki & James, Jeffrey D. & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2013. "Sport event innovativeness: Conceptualization, measurement, and its impact on consumer behavior," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 68-84.
    11. Teresa Barros & Paula Rodrigues & Nelson Duarte & Xue-Feng Shao & F. V. Martins & H. Barandas-Karl & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2020. "The Impact of Brand Relationships on Corporate Brand Identity and Reputation—An Integrative Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Deepa Chandrasekaran & Gerard J. Tellis, 2008. "Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth, or Vanishing Differences?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 844-860, 09-10.
    13. Dean Karlan & Adam Osman & Nour Shammout, 2021. "Increasing Financial Inclusion in the Muslim World: Evidence from an Islamic Finance Marketing Experiment," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 376-397.
    14. Alban Verchere, 2022. "Is social polarization bad for the planet? A theoretical inquiry," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 427-456, April.
    15. Donald R. Lehmann, 2017. "Creating and writing effective research," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 171-179, July.
    16. Jie Bai, 2016. "Melons as Lemons: Asymmetric Information, Consumer Learning and Seller Reputation," Natural Field Experiments 00540, The Field Experiments Website.
    17. Yupin Yang & Mengze Shi & Avi Goldfarb, 2009. "Estimating the Value of Brand Alliances in Professional Team Sports," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1095-1111, 11-12.
    18. Dirk Crass & Dirk Czarnitzki & Andrew A. Toole, 2019. "The Dynamic Relationship Between Investments in Brand Equity and Firm Profitability: Evidence Using Trademark Registrations," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 157-176, January.
    19. Samira Raki & Mahani Mohammad Abdu Shakur, 2018. "Brand Orientation in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) from Malaysian Government Perspective," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 377-391, July.
    20. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2351-:d:1048627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.