IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2090-d1043978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Subsidy Strategies for the New Energy Vehicle Power Battery Recycling Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Enci Wang

    (School of Customs and Public Economics, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai 201204, China)

  • Jianyun Nie

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan)

  • Yuhan Wang

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of the new energy vehicle industry is an essential part of reducing CO 2 emissions in the transportation sector and achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. This vigorous development of the new energy vehicle industry has generated many end-of-life power batteries that cannot be recycled and reused, which has brought serious consequences for the environment. In order to solve the negative externality problem brought by EoL power batteries, how the government intervenes in the development of the market and guides multiple parties to cooperate in recycling EoL power batteries is a question worthy of deep consideration. In this paper, we consider that the government acts before recycling companies and consumers, and recycling companies and consumers act again according to the policy. First, we examine an evolutionary game model of recycling companies and consumers in the absence of the government and explore their choice strategies in various scenarios. Second, we examine how government subsidies to recycling companies and consumers may change the trend toward positive recycling in different circumstances. This paper compares the effects of government policies on subsidies to recycling companies, subsidies to consumers, and subsidies to recycling companies and consumers. Finally, the paper proposes policy suggestions from the perspectives of the government, recycling companies, and consumers. The conclusion suggests that the market does not guarantee a high return for both parties without government subsidies. It is difficult for recyclers and consumers to cooperate proactively in recycling end-of-life power batteries. Thus, it is found that government subsidies to recycling companies and consumers can maximize social welfare at the lowest government cost. Even though government subsidies are currently targeted at recycling companies, they should gradually be extended to consumers as the industry develops.

Suggested Citation

  • Enci Wang & Jianyun Nie & Yuhan Wang, 2023. "Government Subsidy Strategies for the New Energy Vehicle Power Battery Recycling Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2090-:d:1043978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Wei-min & Zhao, Zhang & Ke, Hua, 2013. "Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 221-227.
    2. Yuan Shao & Xudong Deng & Qiankai Qing & Yajuan Wang, 2018. "Optimal Battery Recycling Strategy for Electric Vehicle under Government Subsidy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Gu, Xiaoyu & Zhou, Li & Huang, Hongfu & Shi, Xiutian & Ieromonachou, Petros, 2021. "Electric vehicle battery secondary use under government subsidy: A closed-loop supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Shao, Lulu & Yang, Jun & Zhang, Min, 2017. "Subsidy scheme or price discount scheme? Mass adoption of electric vehicles under different market structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1181-1195.
    5. Daniel Friedman, 1998. "On economic applications of evolutionary game theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 15-43.
    6. Pavlovic, Jelica & Marotta, Alessandro & Ciuffo, Biagio, 2016. "CO2 emissions and energy demands of vehicles tested under the NEDC and the new WLTP type approval test procedures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 661-670.
    7. Chen, Jiumei & Zhang, Wen & Gong, Bengang & Zhang, Xiaoqi & Li, Hongping, 2022. "Optimal policy for the recycling of electric vehicle retired power batteries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Nguyen-Tien, Viet & Dai, Qiang & Harper, Gavin D.J. & Anderson, Paul A. & Elliott, Robert J.R., 2022. "Optimising the geospatial configuration of a future lithium ion battery recycling industry in the transition to electric vehicles and a circular economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    9. Heymans, Catherine & Walker, Sean B. & Young, Steven B. & Fowler, Michael, 2014. "Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 22-30.
    10. Assunção, André & Moura, Pedro S. & de Almeida, Aníbal T., 2016. "Technical and economic assessment of the secondary use of repurposed electric vehicle batteries in the residential sector to support solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 120-131.
    11. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    12. Kai Liu & Chuanxu Wang, 2021. "The impacts of subsidy policies and channel encroachment on the power battery recycling of new energy vehicles," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 770-789.
    13. Zhang, Huiming & Zhu, Kexin & Hang, Zixuan & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Yi & Xu, Zhidong, 2022. "Waste battery-to-reutilization decisions under government subsidies: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arne Jeppe & Heike Proff & Max Eickhoff, 2023. "Economic Potentials of Ecologically Attractive Multi-Life Products—The Example of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Aqueeb Sohail Shaik & Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani & Girish Jain & Bhumika Gupta & Ankit Mehrotra, 2024. "Artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven strategic business model innovations in small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises. Insights on technological and strategic enablers for carbon neutral businesses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2731-2751, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Xuan Zhao & Benhong Peng & Chaoyu Zheng & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Closed-loop supply chain pricing strategy for electric vehicle batteries recycling in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7725-7752, June.
    3. Gu, Huaying & Liu, Zhixue & Qing, Qiankai, 2017. "Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 579-589.
    4. Fang, Lei & Li, Yanlin & Govindan, Kannan, 2024. "Entry mode selection for a new entrant of the electric vehicle automaker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 270-280.
    5. Xia, Xiaoning & Li, Pengwei & Cheng, Yang, 2024. "Economic and environmental evaluation of different collection models for spent power batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Zhang, Huiming & Zhu, Kexin & Hang, Zixuan & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Yi & Xu, Zhidong, 2022. "Waste battery-to-reutilization decisions under government subsidies: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Ai, Ho Thi Thu, 2024. "Remanufacturing electric vehicle battery supply chain under government subsidies and carbon trading: Optimal pricing and return policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    8. Yuan Shao & Xudong Deng & Qiankai Qing & Yajuan Wang, 2018. "Optimal Battery Recycling Strategy for Electric Vehicle under Government Subsidy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Deng Li & Ying Peng & Chunxiang Guo & Ruwen Tan, 2019. "Pricing Strategy of Construction and Demolition Waste Considering Retailer Fairness Concerns under a Governmental Regulation Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    11. Shizhen Bai & Ling Ge & Xuelian Zhang, 2022. "Platform or direct channel: government-subsidized recycling strategies for WEEE," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 347-369, June.
    12. Li, Jingjing & Wang, Zhaoxin & Li, Hui & Jiao, Jianling, 2024. "Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    13. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Gu, Xubo & Bai, Hanyu & Cui, Xiaofan & Zhu, Juner & Zhuang, Weichao & Li, Zhaojian & Hu, Xiaosong & Song, Ziyou, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities for second-life batteries: Key technologies and economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Liu, Chang-Yi & Wang, Hui & Tang, Juan & Chang, Ching-Ter & Liu, Zhi, 2021. "Optimal recovery model in a used batteries closed-loop supply chain considering uncertain residual capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Renbang Shan & Li Luo & Baoli Shi, 2023. "The choice of recycling strategies for decision-makers based on government subsidy and service budget," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1441-1472, February.
    19. Tong Shu & Zhizhen Peng & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Honglin Yang, 2017. "Government Subsidy for Remanufacturing or Carbon Tax Rebate: Which Is Better for Firms and a Low-Carbon Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2090-:d:1043978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.