IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p882-d204315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Tan

    (Business School of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Chunxiang Guo

    (Business School of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

With the emphasis on environmental protection issues, countries have introduced a number of circular economy-related policies aimed at guiding enterprises to green development and green innovation. At the same time, they are encouraged to strengthen the combination of forward logistics and reverse logistics, providing an effective way to improve resource shortages and reduce environmental pollution. However, the quality of recycled products in reverse logistics is often uncertain, which not only increases the risk of production decisions of remanufacturers, but also affects the sales of new products in the forward logistics to a certain extent. Based on the uncertainty of recycling quality of waste products and the controllability of remanufacturing technology level, this paper studies the impact of various regulatory environments on the operation of a two-way logistics system. We solve the decision model of the system through game theory. The results show that the government’s policy can improve product recycling quality and remanufacturing technology. However, recycling rewards and punishments, remanufacturing technology subsidies, and recycling payment factors need to be within a certain range to ensure the effectiveness of the trading market. When the recycling regulation has been implemented, it is beneficial for manufacturers to choose to improve their remanufacturing technology level. This means that the combined effect of multiple policies is more conducive to the operation of a two-way logistics system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:882-:d:204315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2010. "Optimal Reverse Channel Structure for Consumer Product Returns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1071-1085, 11-12.
    2. Ma, Wei-min & Zhao, Zhang & Ke, Hua, 2013. "Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 221-227.
    3. Giutini, Ron & Gaudette, Kevin, 2003. "Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 41-48.
    4. Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay & Anand A. Paul, 2010. "Equilibrium Returns Policies in the Presence of Supplier Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 846-857, 09-10.
    5. Liu, Huihui & Lei, Ming & Deng, Honghui & Keong Leong, G. & Huang, Tao, 2016. "A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 290-302.
    6. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Zoboli, Roberto, 2006. "Economic instruments and induced innovation: The European policies on end-of-life vehicles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 318-337, June.
    7. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Koert van Ittersum, 2015. "Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 60-72, January.
    8. Maryam Esmaeili & Ghazaleh Allameh & Taraneh Tajvidi, 2016. "Using game theory for analysing pricing models in closed-loop supply chain from short- and long-term perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2152-2169, April.
    9. Chen, Wenyi & Kucukyazici, Beste & Verter, Vedat & Jesús Sáenz, María, 2015. "Supply chain design for unlocking the value of remanufacturing under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 804-819.
    10. David F. Drake & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2016. "Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1006-1025, June.
    11. Çerağ Pinçe & Mark Ferguson & Beril Toktay, 2016. "Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, October.
    12. Kai Meng & Peihuang Lou & Xianghui Peng & Victor Prybutok, 2017. "Quality-driven recovery decisions for used components in reverse logistics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4712-4728, August.
    13. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2017. "The optimal reverse channel choice under supply chain competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 63-66.
    14. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Supply Chain Consequences of Subsidies for Corporate Social Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1346-1357, August.
    15. James D. Abbey & Rainer Kleber & Gilvan C. Souza & Guido Voigt, 2017. "The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 100-115, January.
    16. Zongsheng Huang & Jiajia Nie & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2017. "Dynamic Collection Strategy and Coordination of a Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Zhou, Wenhui & Zheng, Yanfang & Huang, Weixiang, 2017. "Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 641-655.
    18. Xie, Gang & Wang, Shouyang & Lai, K.K., 2011. "Quality improvement in competing supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 262-270, November.
    19. Östlin, Johan & Sundin, Erik & Björkman, Mats, 2008. "Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 336-348, October.
    20. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    21. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun, 2016. "The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(2), pages 392-403.
    22. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    23. Pokharel, Shaligram & Liang, Yijiong, 2012. "A model to evaluate acquisition price and quantity of used products for remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 170-176.
    24. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
    25. Rahman, Shams & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2012. "Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 239-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ebrahimi Bajgani, Sahar & Saberi, Sara & Toyasaki, Fuminori, 2023. "Designing a reverse supply chain network with quality control for returned products: Strategies to mitigate free-riding effect and ensure compliance with technology licensing requirements," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Deng Li & Ying Peng & Chunxiang Guo & Ruwen Tan, 2019. "Pricing Strategy of Construction and Demolition Waste Considering Retailer Fairness Concerns under a Governmental Regulation Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2023. "Government interventions in closed-loop supply chains with modularity design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Xiaoxiao Chang & Guangye Xu & Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong, 2020. "A Game Theoretic Approach for Eco-Design and Remanufacturing Considering Take-Back Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Lingyun Mi & Ting Xu & Xiaoli Gan & Hong Chen & Lijie Qiao & Hanlin Zhu, 2019. "How to Motivate Employees’ Environmental Citizenship Behavior through Perceived Interpersonal Circle Power? A New Perspective from Chinese Circle Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Jintao Zhang & Zhen Yang & Li Meng & Lu Han, 2022. "Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4088-4109, March.
    7. Liping Song & Yingluo Yan & Fengmin Yao, 2020. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models Considering Government Subsidy and Corporate Social Responsibility Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Fiorillo, Fabio & Merkaj, Elvina, 2024. "Municipal strategies, fiscal incentives and co-production in urban waste management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Tongtong Jiang & Xiuguo Wu & Yunxiao Yin, 2023. "Logistics Efficiency Evaluation and Empirical Research under the New Retailing Model: The Way toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Wang, Zhen & Duan, Yongrui & Huo, Jiazhen, 2022. "The impact of government intervention measures on recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment in China considering consumer decision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Arijit Bhattacharya & Shefali Srivastava & Abhijit Majumdar, 2024. "Circular supply chains in manufacturing—Quo vadis? Accomplishments, challenges and future opportunities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4397-4423, July.
    13. Dingzhong Feng & Xinghui Yu & Yongbo Mao & Yangke Ding & Ye Zhang & Zhiyan Pan, 2019. "Pricing Decision for Reverse Logistics System under Cross-Competitive Take-Back Mode Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Zhang, Yanzi & Berenguer, Gemma & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2024. "A subsidized reverse supply chain in the Chinese electronics industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Xiaohua Han & Ying Shen & Yiwen Bian, 2020. "Optimal recovery strategy of manufacturers: Remanufacturing products or recycling materials?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 463-489, July.
    4. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    5. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    6. Chenxu Ke & Bo Yan & Jingna Ji, 2023. "Pricing new and remanufactured products under patent protection and government intervention," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 131-161, May.
    7. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Kangzhou Wang & Yingxue Zhao & Yonghong Cheng & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2014. "Cooperation or Competition? Channel Choice for a Remanufacturing Fashion Supply Chain with Government Subsidy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    13. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    15. Borenich, Andrea & Dickbauer, Yanick & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C., 2020. "Should a manufacturer sell refurbished returns on the secondary market to incentivize retailers to reduce consumer returns?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 569-579.
    16. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2018. "Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 661-681.
    18. Pietro Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2019. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    19. Liping Song & Yingluo Yan & Fengmin Yao, 2020. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models Considering Government Subsidy and Corporate Social Responsibility Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Quality choice for product recovery considering a trade-in program and third-party remanufacturing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:882-:d:204315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.