IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1929-d1041368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Key Factors for Sustainability Reporting Adoption in the Semiconductor Industry Using the Hybrid FRST-PSO Technique and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jeng-Bang Wang

    (College of Art Design, Hsuan Chuang University, Hsinchu 30092, Taiwan)

  • Guan-Hua Wang

    (Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan)

  • Chung-Ya Ou

    (School of Public Administration, Nanfang College, Guangzhou 510970, China)

Abstract

The proliferation of sustainability reporting (SR) is in response to environmental and social responsibility, but investors are increasingly concerned over the effects of sustainability reporting in corporate sustainability. The Sustainability Accounting Standard Board (SASB)’s sustainability standards are acknowledged as the main framework for implementing this activity, yet the influencing factors among sustainability reports highly correlate and are diverse and complicated, especially in the semiconductor industry, which is the key driving force for economic development in China. To exploit and evaluate those key factors, this research introduces a hybrid model that integrates fuzzy rough set theory with particle swarm optimization (FRST-PSO) and a fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (fuzzy DEMATEL). FRST-PSO is adopted to filter out redundant and irrelevant factors, and the selected results are then inserted into fuzzy DEMATEL to depict the opaque relationships and set up a prioritization strategy for improvement among the factors. According to the findings on the magnitude of the impact, the priorities for improvement are environment, human capital, social capital, leadership and governance, and business model and innovation. Based on the results, an optimal and practical solution is proposed as the basis for information disclosure of sustainability reporting for the semiconductor industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeng-Bang Wang & Guan-Hua Wang & Chung-Ya Ou, 2023. "The Key Factors for Sustainability Reporting Adoption in the Semiconductor Industry Using the Hybrid FRST-PSO Technique and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1929-:d:1041368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. António Pedro Vieira & Gregor Radonjič, 2020. "Disclosure of eco‐innovation activities in European large companies' sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2240-2253, September.
    2. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    3. de Villiers, Charl & van Staden, Chris J., 2010. "Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 227-240.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2017-2872 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Carla Antonini & Cornelia Beck & Carlos Larrinaga, 2020. "Subpolitics and sustainability reporting boundaries. The case of working conditions in global supply chains," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1535-1567, July.
    6. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    7. Isaac Lemus-Aguilar & Gustavo Morales-Alonso & Andres Ramirez-Portilla & Antonio Hidalgo, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models through the Lens of Organizational Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Laura Corazza & Elisa Truant & Simone Domenico Scagnelli & Chiara Mio, 2020. "Sustainability reporting after the Costa Concordia disaster: a multi-theory study on legitimacy, impression management and image restoration," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1909-1941, July.
    9. Anika Kozlowski & Cory Searcy & Michal Bardecki, 2015. "Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(3), pages 377-397, March.
    10. Josh Wei-Jun Hsueh, 2018. "Governance Structure and the Credibility Gap: Experimental Evidence on Family Businesses’ Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 547-568, December.
    11. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Ming-Fu Hsu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2021. "Construction of an AI-Driven Risk Management Framework for Financial Service Firms Using the MRDM Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1037-1069, May.
    12. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    13. Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2019. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Disclosure on the Web: An Exploratory Study," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 32(1), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Antonio Costantini, 2020. "Materiality in integrated and sustainability reporting: A paradigm shift?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 306-320, January.
    15. Priyanka Aggarwal & Ajay Kumar Singh, 2018. "CSR and sustainability reporting practices in India: an in-depth content analysis of top-listed companies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(8), pages 1033-1053, December.
    16. Habiba Al-Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2019. "CEO Compensation and Sustainability Reporting Assurance: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 233-252, August.
    17. Arturo Rodriguez & Henrik Cotran & Levi S. Stewart, 2017. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sustainability Disclosure: Findings from a Recent SASB Study," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 29(2), pages 100-108, June.
    18. Ming-Fu Hsu & Chingho Chang & Jhih‐Hong Zeng, 2022. "Automated text mining process for corporate risk analysis and management," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 386-419, December.
    19. Ali Uyar & Abdullah S Karaman & Merve Kilic, 2021. "Institutional drivers of sustainability reporting in the global tourism industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 105-128, February.
    20. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-05-2018-3488 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Wim Lambrechts & Semen Son-Turan & Lucinda Reis & Janjaap Semeijn, 2019. "Lean, Green and Clean? Sustainability Reporting in the Logistics Sector," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, January.
    22. Ioannis Karagiannis & Panagiotis Vouros & Antonis Skouloudis & Konstantinos Evangelinos, 2019. "Sustainability reporting, materiality, and accountability assessment in the airport industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1370-1405, November.
    23. Clemens Mader, Geoffrey Scott and Dzulkifli Abdul Razak & Carol A. Adams, 2013. "Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(3), pages 384-392, November.
    24. Jieun Chung & Charles H. Cho, 2018. "Current Trends within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 207-239, June.
    25. Kannan Govindan & Arash Khalili Nasr & Farzane Karimi & Hassan Mina, 2022. "Circular economy adoption barriers: An extended fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL and Supermatrix structure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1566-1586, May.
    26. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-12-2017-0294 is not listed on IDEAS
    27. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2019-4167 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Chen-Te Chiang & Yen-Hui Wang, 2024. "Assessing Southeast Asia countries’ potential in the semiconductor supply chain: an objectively weighting multi-criteria decision-making approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Castro-Lopez, Adrian & Iglesias, Victor & Santos-Vijande, María Leticia, 2023. "Organizational capabilities and institutional pressures in the adoption of circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Coluccia, Benedetta & Barbieri, Roberta & Palmi, Pamela & Natale, Francesco, 2024. "Public ownership and ESG policies: implications for firm productivity in local transportation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    5. Irene Josa & Albert de la Fuente & Maria del Mar Casanovas-Rubio & Jaume Armengou & Antonio Aguado, 2021. "Sustainability-Oriented Model to Decide on Concrete Pipeline Reinforcement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Eduardo Schiehll & Sam Kolahgar, 2021. "Financial materiality in the informativeness of sustainability reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 840-855, February.
    7. Arie Pratama & Edi Jaenudin & Syaiful Anas, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance - Sustainability Disclosure Using International Financial Reporting Sustainability Standards S1 in Southeast Asian Companies: A Preliminary Assessment," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 456-472, November.
    8. Gloria Fiorani & Chiara Di Gerio, 2022. "Reporting University Performance through the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda: Lessons Learned from Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Cansu Perdeli Demirkan & Nicole M. Smith & H. Sebnem Duzgun & Aurora Waclawski, 2021. "A Data-Driven Approach to Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices in Extractive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-37, August.
    10. Shauhrat S. Chopra & Sachini Supunsala Senadheera & Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake & Piumi Amasha Withana & Rajeev Chib & Jay Hyuk Rhee & Yong Sik Ok, 2024. "Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Wesley Friske & Atanas Nik Nikolov & Todd Morgan, 2024. "Making the grade: An analysis of sustainability reporting standards and Global Reporting Initiative adherence ratings," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2098-2108, May.
    12. Karim Mahran & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2024. "Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and corporate environmental sustainability: A systematic literature review and avenues for future research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1977-2003, March.
    13. Sofia Garcia-Torres & Marta Rey-Garcia & Laura Albareda-Vivo, 2017. "Effective Disclosure in the Fast-Fashion Industry: from Sustainability Reporting to Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Wullianallur Raghupathi & Sarah Jinhui Wu & Viju Raghupathi, 2023. "Understanding Corporate Sustainability Disclosures from the Securities Exchange Commission Filings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-32, February.
    15. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    17. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    18. Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea & Pegdéwendé Nestor Sawadogo, 2019. "Assessing the effects of combating illicit financial flows on domestic tax revenue mobilization in developing countries," Post-Print halshs-02315734, HAL.
    19. Yongming Song & Jun Hu, 2017. "Vector similarity measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1929-:d:1041368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.