IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16611-d1295140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Information Accessibility of Museums and Places of Historical Interest: A Comparison between London and Thessaloniki

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Koustriava

    (Department of Educational and Social Policy, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Maria Koutsmani

    (Department of Educational and Social Policy, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Accessibility to the cultural heritage of museums is an inalienable right of all individuals. However, these places appear to be very unfriendly and unsustainable towards individuals with mobility, sensory, and cognitive difficulties, resulting in their exclusion from cultural heritage. The aim of the research was to examine the spatial and information accessibility in certain museums and places of historical interest in two culturally important European cities, London (Great Britain) and Thessaloniki (Greece). Fifteen museums in London and fifteen in Thessaloniki were visited and assessed thoroughly. The tools used were a) an extended checklist of accessibility criteria and standards developed in the context of the present research and b) a semi-structured interview. The results showed that the London museums are slightly more accessible than the museums in Thessaloniki, especially with reference to spatial accessibility. All participant museums should focus more on individuals with impairments other than physical/mobility since their main accessibility features appear to serve only mobility and navigation needs. Moreover, while the buildings of the recent past are more accessible, buildings that are listed or are themselves of historical interest are difficult to adjust. The results present which specific categories need to be urgently targeted and, thus, in which direction any corrective action towards accessibility should be placed. These findings are of great interest for all stakeholders in cultural accessibility and social inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Koustriava & Maria Koutsmani, 2023. "Spatial and Information Accessibility of Museums and Places of Historical Interest: A Comparison between London and Thessaloniki," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16611-:d:1295140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Johnson & Barry Thomas, 1998. "The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(2), pages 75-85, June.
    2. Hilary Silver, 2015. "The Contexts of Social Inclusion," Working Papers 144, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Ana Valdivia, 2019. "Measuring and Exploiting the Impact of Exhibition Scheduling on Museum Attendance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 761-779, October.
    2. Leask, Anna, 2010. "Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166.
    3. Maria Llop & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2012. "Economic impact of a new museum on the local economy: “the Gaudí Centre”," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 17-23, March.
    4. Darmody, Merike & Smyth, Emer, 2018. "The goals and governance of the social inclusion and community activation programme (SICAP) 2015-2017: a mixed methods study," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS68.
    5. Vincent G. Munley, 2018. "A Contingent Valuation Analysis of the Galway City Museum: Welfare Estimates for Attendance in the Absence of an Admission Fee," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 49(4), pages 489-514.
    6. Degryse, Hans & Bouckaert, Jan, 2001. "Borrower Poaching and Information Display in Credit Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 2936, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Christopher Anierobi & Cletus O. Obasi, 2021. "Urbanization and Rural-Urban Migration: Toward Involving the Church in Addressing Pro-Poor Urban Housing Challenges in Enugu, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    8. Lucía Martínez‐Virto & Víctor Sánchez‐Salmerón, 2021. "Regional responses to social changes in Spain. Trends and policy challenges for social cohesion," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1407-1422, October.
    9. Haralambie George Alin, 2017. "An Analysis Of Social Inclusion In Eu," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 17-24, August.
    10. Tohmo, Timo, 2004. "Economic value of a local museum: Factors of willingness-to-pay," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 229-240, April.
    11. Elena GORI & Silvia FISSI, 2013. "From Cash to Accrual Accounting: A Model to Evaluate the Performance of Public Museums," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 519-541, October.
    12. Domenica Federico & Maria Adele Milioli & Antonella Notte & Lucia Poletti, 2020. "Financial and Social Inclusion and Financial Sector Development: An Outline in the EU28," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 12(1), pages 14-35, January.
    13. Juan Prieto-Rodríguez & Víctor Fernández-Blanco, 2006. "Optimal pricing and grant policies for museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(3), pages 169-181, December.
    14. Silvia Fedeli & Michele Santoni, 2006. "The Government's Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(1), pages 41-72, March.
    15. Christopher M. Anierobi & Dickson M. Nwalusi & Kingsley O. Efobi & Kelechi I. Nwosu & Nneka C. Nwokolo & Eziyi O. Ibem, 2023. "Urban Housing Inequality and the Nature of Relationship Between Formal and Informal Settlements in Enugu Metropolis, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    16. Paul Bishop & Steven Brand, 2003. "The efficiency of museums: a stochastic frontier production function approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(17), pages 1853-1858.
    17. Veronica Garcia Donoso & Eugenio Fernandes Queiroga, 2023. "Social Landscape, Peripheral Inclusion and Un-Practice: Concepts for Understanding Social Housing Daily Life in Open Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Kayla Stajkovic & Alexander D. Stajkovic, 2024. "Ethics of Care Leadership, Racial Inclusion, and Economic Health in the Cities: Is There a Female Leadership Advantage?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 699-721, February.
    19. Fenghua Zhang & Pascal Courty, 2022. "The China museum visit boom: Government or demand driven?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(1), pages 135-163, March.
    20. Adela Coman, 2018. "The Economics of Cultural Heritage: The Case of Museums," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 28(1), pages 63-73, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16611-:d:1295140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.