IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16546-d1293997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Household Interventions on Promoting Waste Segregation Behavior at Source: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Babak Moeini

    (Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Erfan Ayubi

    (Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Sciences & Technology Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Majid Barati

    (Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Saeid Bashirian

    (Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Health Sciences & Technology Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Leili Tapak

    (Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Khadije Ezzati-Rastgar

    (Health Education & Health Promotion, Strategic Management Office, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

  • Maryam Hashemian

    (Health Education & Health Promotion, Public Health School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838687, Iran)

Abstract

Waste segregation at the source is one of the most important strategies of urban waste management and the first environmental priority. This systematic review study was conducted to determine the effects of various interventions to promote household waste segregation behavior. Studies were searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases using the keywords “waste segregation, intervention, randomized controlled trials, and clinical trials”. Through 2 January 2022, two researchers were independently involved in article screening and data abstraction. Inclusion criteria were as follows: experimental and quasi-experimental studies where primary outcomes of the studies included improvement in waste separation behavior, and secondary outcomes of the studies included increased knowledge and improvement in psychological factors. Articles that did not focus on households, studies that focused only on food or electronics separation, and studies that focused only on recycling and its methods were excluded. Of the original 5084 studies, only 26 met the inclusion criteria after reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the articles. The age of study participants ranged from 15 to 82 years. It seems that most of the studies that suggest higher efficacy consider older age groups for the intervention. Positive results of the interventions were reported in all studies with different ratios; in five studies, the improvement in results was more than 20%. Meta-analysis was not possible because of the diversity of study strategies and outcomes measured. In the studies that lasted longer than two months, people’s waste separation behavior was more permanent. Approaches such as engagement, feedback, and theory-based interventions have been effective in promoting waste separation behavior. Interventions that considered environmental, social, and organizational factors (such as segregation facilities, regular collection of segregated waste, tax exemption, and cooperation of related organizations) in addition to individual factors were more effective and sustainable. For the comparison of studies and meta-analysis of data, it is suggested to use standard criteria such as mean and standard deviation of waste separation behavior and influential structures such as attitude and norm in studies. The results show that it is necessary to use environmental research and ecological approaches and intermittent interventions over time to maintain and continue waste separation behavior. Based on the results of the current research, policy makers and researchers can develop efficient measures to improve waste sorting behavior by using appropriate patterns in society and knowing the effective factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Babak Moeini & Erfan Ayubi & Majid Barati & Saeid Bashirian & Leili Tapak & Khadije Ezzati-Rastgar & Maryam Hashemian, 2023. "Effect of Household Interventions on Promoting Waste Segregation Behavior at Source: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16546-:d:1293997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lakhan, Calvin, 2016. "Out of sight, out of mind: Issues and obstacles to recycling in Ontario's multi residential buildings," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Maria Triassi & Rossella Alfano & Maddalena Illario & Antonio Nardone & Oreste Caporale & Paolo Montuori, 2015. "Environmental Pollution from Illegal Waste Disposal and Health Effects: A Review on the “Triangle of Death”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Miguel Ángel Aguilar-Jurado & Pedro Gil-Madrona & Juan Francisco Ortega-Dato & David Zamorano-García, 2019. "Effects of an Educational Glass Recycling Program against Environmental Pollution in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Ernest Yaw Tweneboah-Koduah & Matilda Adams & Kwamina Minta Nyarku, 2020. "Using Theory in Social Marketing to Predict Waste Disposal Behaviour among Households in Ghana," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 62-77, January.
    5. Yan Wang & Feng Hao & Yunxia Liu, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behavior in an Aging World: Evidence from 31 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abraham Yeboah & Nana Owusu-Frimpong & Ofosu Agyekum & Vida Owusu-Prempeh, 2023. "Measuring situational factors in theory of attribution to consumer attitudes towards unlawful disposal of solid waste products in Ghana with special reference to Sunyani: a mediation and moderation an," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Alfredo Mazza & Prisco Piscitelli & Andrea Falco & Maria Lucia Santoro & Manuela Colangelo & Giovanni Imbriani & Adele Idolo & Antonella De Donno & Leopoldo Iannuzzi & Annamaria Colao, 2018. "Heavy Environmental Pressure in Campania and Other Italian Regions: A Short Review of Available Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Maurizio Bifulco, 2015. "Comments on Triassi et al. Environmental Pollution from Illegal Waste Disposal and Health Effects: A Review on the “Triangle of Death”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12 , 1216–1236," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-2, March.
    4. Alfredo Mazza & Prisco Piscitelli & Cosimo Neglia & Giulia Della Rosa & Leopoldo Iannuzzi, 2015. "Illegal Dumping of Toxic Waste and Its Effect on Human Health in Campania, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Fengqin Qin, 2022. "Fiscal Expenditure Structure, Vertical Fiscal Imbalance and Environmental Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Wang, Yueying & Liu, Qinming, 2024. "Examining factors driving household carbon emissions from elderly families—Evidence from Japan," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Saidia Ali & Farid Shirazi, 2022. "A Transformer-Based Machine Learning Approach for Sustainable E-Waste Management: A Comparative Policy Analysis between the Swiss and Canadian Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Israel-Javier Juma-Michilena & Maria-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina & Irene Gil-Saura & Sergio Belda-Miquel, 2024. "Pro-environmental behaviours of generation Z: A cross-cultural approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(3), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Colette Konietzny & Jirka Konietzny & Albert Caruana, 2024. "Drivers of Pro-Ecological Behaviour Norms among Environmentalists, Hunters and the General Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Vivianni Palmeira Wanderley & Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca & André Vala Quiaios & José Nuno Domingues & Susana Paixão & João Figueiredo & Ana Ferreira & Cleonice De Almeida Pinto & Odair Ramos Da Sil, 2017. "Socio-Environmental and Hematological Profile of Landfill Residents (São Jorge Landfill–Sao Paulo, Brazil)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Neeraj C. Hanumante & Yogendra Shastri & Andrew Hoadley, 2022. "Sustainability in a global circular economy: Insights on consumer price sensitivity," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1094-1107, June.
    12. Nestor Asiamah & Kofi Awuviry-Newton & Whitney Nesser & Evelyn N. Alvarez, 2023. "Carbon Footprints of Active and Non-Active Transport Modes: Hierarchy and Intergenerational Narrative Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Gi-Wook Cha & Se-Hyu Choi & Won-Hwa Hong & Choon-Wook Park, 2022. "Development of Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Demolition Waste Generation Rate of Buildings in Redevelopment Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Benett Siyabonga Madonsela & Machete Machete & Karabo Shale, 2024. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems of Solid Waste Management in Bushbuckridge Rural Communities, South Africa," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Keren Dopelt & Liza Aharon & Miri Rimon, 2024. "Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding Health and Environment in an Israeli Community: Implications for Sustainable Urban Environments and Public Health," World, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Micaela Pinho & Sofia Gomes, 2023. "What Role Does Sustainable Behavior and Environmental Awareness from Civil Society Play in the Planet’s Sustainable Transition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Gi-Wook Cha & Won-Hwa Hong & Young-Chan Kim, 2023. "Performance Improvement of Machine Learning Model Using Autoencoder to Predict Demolition Waste Generation Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Nelson de Matos & Marisol B. Correia & José Ramón Saura & Ana Reyes-Menendez & Nuno Baptista, 2020. "Marketing in the Public Sector—Benefits and Barriers: A Bibliometric Study from 1931 to 2020," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Graham, Anne & Kruse, Willy & Budd, Lucy & Kremarik, Frances & Ison, Stephen, 2023. "Ageing passenger perceptions of ground access journeys to airports: A survey of UK residents," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Iulian Georgescu & Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru & Mădălina Georgiana Mangra, 2022. "The Role of Human Resources Management in the Internal Branding of Public Organizations," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 555-559, Decembrie.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16546-:d:1293997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.