IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16448-d1291508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Distribution Packaging for Fresh Food

Author

Listed:
  • Soo Y. Kim

    (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dong H. Kang

    (Korea Packaging Center, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Bucheon 14449, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Korakot Charoensri

    (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Jae R. Ryu

    (AIMT Co., Ltd., Daegu 43020, Republic of Korea)

  • Yang J. Shin

    (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun J. Park

    (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment of three different products with reusable and single-use packaging for fresh food distribution was conducted. For the reusable packaging, one utilized a vacuum insulation panel (VIP) box made of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (r-PET), while the other employed expanded polyethylene (EPE). For comparison, a disposable box made of widely used expanded polystyrene (EPS) was selected. We analyzed the environmental impacts of production, transportation, reprocessing (reused boxes), and disposal in 18 impact categories. As a result of analyzing the actual reuse of 300 rounds of fresh food, the cumulative global warming potential (GWP) values of the VIP and EPE box were 136.58 kg carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) eq and 281.72 kg CO 2 eq, respectively, 87% and 74% lower than those of the EPS box. Additionally, the GWP values were the same as those of the EPS boxes when the VIP and EPE boxes were reused 7 and 12 times, respectively. The best-case scenario was revealed when the reusable packaging with the r-PET VIP was compared with the EPE and EPS boxes. In conclusion, reusable packaging is expected to contribute to the reduction in the environmental burden and better suit global environmental requirements for sustainable food distribution and related industries. In addition, our findings can inform policy and industry decisions to promote more sustainable practices in the food industry, contributing to the advancement of sustainability in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo Y. Kim & Dong H. Kang & Korakot Charoensri & Jae R. Ryu & Yang J. Shin & Hyun J. Park, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Distribution Packaging for Fresh Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16448-:d:1291508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16448/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16448/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalnæs, Simen Edsjø & Jelle, Bjørn Petter, 2014. "Vacuum insulation panel products: A state-of-the-art review and future research pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 355-375.
    2. Alam, M. & Singh, H. & Limbachiya, M.C., 2011. "Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs) for building construction industry – A review of the contemporary developments and future directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3592-3602.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alam, M. & Singh, H. & Suresh, S. & Redpath, D.A.G., 2017. "Energy and economic analysis of Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs) used in non-domestic buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Villasmil, Willy & Fischer, Ludger J. & Worlitschek, Jörg, 2019. "A review and evaluation of thermal insulation materials and methods for thermal energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 71-84.
    3. Božiček, D. & Peterková, J. & Zach, J. & Košir, M., 2024. "Vacuum insulation panels: An overview of research literature with an emphasis on environmental and economic studies for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. De Masi, Rosa Francesca & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2020. "Multi-layered wall with vacuum insulation panels: Results of 5-years in-field monitoring and numerical analysis of aging effect on building consumptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Gonçalves, Márcio & Simões, Nuno & Serra, Catarina & Flores-Colen, Inês, 2020. "A review of the challenges posed by the use of vacuum panels in external insulation finishing systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    6. Li, Xiangyu & Chen, Huisu & Li, Huiqiang & Liu, Lin & Lu, Zeyu & Zhang, Tao & Duan, Wen Hui, 2015. "Integration of form-stable paraffin/nanosilica phase change material composites into vacuum insulation panels for thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 601-609.
    7. Abdul Mujeebu, Muhammad & Ashraf, Noman & Alsuwayigh, Abdulkarim, 2016. "Energy performance and economic viability of nano aerogel glazing and nano vacuum insulation panel in multi-story office building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 949-956.
    8. Biswas, Kaushik & Desjarlais, Andre & Smith, Douglas & Letts, John & Yao, Jennifer & Jiang, Timothy, 2018. "Development and thermal performance verification of composite insulation boards containing foam-encapsulated vacuum insulation panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1159-1172.
    9. Long, Linshuang & Ye, Hong & Liu, Minghou, 2016. "A new insight into opaque envelopes in a passive solar house: Properties and roles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 685-699.
    10. Liang Guo & Wenbin Tong & Yexin Xu & Hong Ye, 2018. "Composites with Excellent Insulation and High Adaptability for Lightweight Envelopes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Abdul Mujeebu, Muhammad & Ashraf, Noman & Alsuwayigh, Abdulkarim H., 2016. "Effect of nano vacuum insulation panel and nanogel glazing on the energy performance of office building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 141-151.
    12. Soares, N. & Santos, P. & Gervásio, H. & Costa, J.J. & Simões da Silva, L., 2017. "Energy efficiency and thermal performance of lightweight steel-framed (LSF) construction: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 194-209.
    13. Chen, Zhou & Chen, Zhaofeng & Yang, Zhaogang & Hu, Jiaming & Yang, Yong & Chang, Lingqian & Lee, L. James & Xu, Tengzhou, 2015. "Preparation and characterization of vacuum insulation panels with super-stratified glass fiber core material," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 945-954.
    14. Kylili, Angeliki & Fokaides, Paris A. & Christou, Petros & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2014. "Infrared thermography (IRT) applications for building diagnostics: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 531-549.
    15. Souayfane, Farah & Biwole, Pascal Henry & Fardoun, Farouk, 2018. "Thermal behavior of a translucent superinsulated latent heat energy storage wall in summertime," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 390-408.
    16. Wang, Y. & Mauree, D. & Sun, Q. & Lin, H. & Scartezzini, J.L. & Wennersten, R., 2020. "A review of approaches to low-carbon transition of high-rise residential buildings in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & Rossi, Filippo de’ & Turni, Gianluca & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2012. "Different methods for the modelling of thermal bridges into energy simulation programs: Comparisons of accuracy for flat heterogeneous roofs in Italian climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 405-418.
    18. Fan, Cheng & Huang, Gongsheng & Sun, Yongjun, 2018. "A collaborative control optimization of grid-connected net zero energy buildings for performance improvements at building group level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 536-549.
    19. M. M. Sarafraz & Alireza Dareh Baghi & Mohammad Reza Safaei & Arturo S. Leon & R. Ghomashchi & Marjan Goodarzi & Cheng-Xian Lin, 2019. "Assessment of Iron Oxide (III)–Therminol 66 Nanofluid as a Novel Working Fluid in a Convective Radiator Heating System for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Kaushik Biswas & Rohit Jogineedi & Andre Desjarlais, 2019. "Experimental and Numerical Examination of Naturally-Aged Foam-VIP Composites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16448-:d:1291508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.