IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p16082-d1282986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agriculture and the Bioeconomy: A Socioeconomic Analysis of Central and Eastern European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Mariana Cismaș

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
    East-European Center for Research in Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Emilia Mary Bălan

    (Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
    Institute for Advanced Environmental Research, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Cristina Georgiana Zeldea

    (Institute for Economic Forecasting, Romanian Academy, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marioara Iordan

    (Institute for Economic Forecasting, Romanian Academy, 050711 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristian Mihai Cismaș

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
    Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The bioeconomy is a complex and increasingly relevant field, and agriculture represents an essential sector for its development. The bioeconomy presents an opportunity for sustainable agriculture that is beneficial for the environment and public health, both globally and particularly for nations with centralized agricultural systems, such as the former socialist Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs). This article takes a novel approach to investigate the bioeconomic indicators in CEECs’ agriculture. It combines the hierarchical grouping method with an index based on socioeconomic indicators specific to the bioeconomy. It aims to find how the selected countries performed in terms of agriculture indicators. The socioeconomic indicator analysis showed that some countries had more linear evolutions than others, while some of them clearly outperformed the average of the region. The cluster analysis divided the countries into three relevant groups. The findings revealed patterns of convergence, but also important differences in the region. These results strengthen the scientific basis for the creation of agricultural bioeconomy strategies and argue for the need of the active engagement of all BIOEAST members in the initiative. We argue that agricultural architectures in Central and Eastern European countries are not just determined by employment circumstances or the extent of agricultural areas, but also by the dynamics of the value of the indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Mariana Cismaș & Emilia Mary Bălan & Cristina Georgiana Zeldea & Marioara Iordan & Cristian Mihai Cismaș, 2023. "Agriculture and the Bioeconomy: A Socioeconomic Analysis of Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16082-:d:1282986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16082/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16082/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Mithun Ali & Andrea Appolloni & Fausto Cavallaro & Idiano D’Adamo & Assunta Di Vaio & Francesco Ferella & Massimo Gastaldi & Muhammad Ikram & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Michael Alan Martin & Abdul, 2023. "Development Goals towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Anna Nowak & Anna Kobiałka & Artur Krukowski, 2021. "Significance of Agriculture for Bioeconomy in the Member States of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:510 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tévécia Ronzon & Stephan Piotrowski & Saulius Tamosiunas & Lara Dammer & Michael Carus & Robert M’barek, 2020. "Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Martina Lori & Sarah Symnaczik & Paul Mäder & Gerlinde De Deyn & Andreas Gattinger, 2017. "Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity—A meta-analysis and meta-regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Tévécia Ronzon & Robert M’Barek, 2018. "Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Gabriela Loredana Dinulescu & Valentina Ofelia Robescu & Florin Radu & Gabriel Croitoru & Valentin Radu, 2018. "A Bioeconomic Solution for Replacing Chemical Fertilizers by Organic Processes for Atmospheric Nitrogen Fixation in Soil," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(48), pages 510-510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Baldoni, Edoardo & Philippidis, George & Spekreijse, Jurjen & Gurría, Patricia & Lammens, Tijs & Parisi, Claudia & Ronzon, Tévécia & Vis, Martijn & M'Barek, Robert, 2021. "Getting your hands dirty: A data digging exercise to unearth the EU's bio-based chemical sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Marko Lovec & Luka Juvančič, 2021. "The Role of Industrial Revival in Untapping the Bioeconomy’s Potential in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Emilia Mary Balan & Cristina Georgiana Zeldea, 2023. "Bioeconomy in Romania: Investigating Farmers’ Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Ronzon, Tévécia & Iost, Susanne & Philippidis, George, 2022. "An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 290-301.
    6. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Cristinel Gigi Sonea & Petre†Adrian Isar & Andra Cristina Sonea & Alice Munteanu, 2021. "The „One Health†Concept, the Result of the Application of Bio - Economic and Ethical Management in the Development of a Business in the Fisheries Sector Cristinel Gigi Şonea," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 2nd International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 15, chapter 23, pages 262-272, Editura Lumen.
    9. Nicolas Robert & Ragnar Jonsson & Rafał Chudy & Andrea Camia, 2020. "The EU Bioeconomy: Supporting an Employment Shift Downstream in the Wood-Based Value Chains?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Raquel Francisco Mafra & Jacir Leonir Casagrande & Ana Regina de Aguiar Dutra & Nei Antonio Nunes & Felipe Texeira Dias & Samuel Borges Barbosa & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, 2024. "Social Innovation as a Support for the Visibility of Vulnerable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    12. Andrzej Czyżewski & Andrzej Grzyb & Anna Matuszczak & Mariola Michałowska, 2021. "Factors for Bioeconomy Development in EU Countries with Different Overall Levels of Economic Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Iureş Mugur Victor Constantin, 2020. "Bioeconomy’s sectors and strategies in Central and Eastern European countries. A literature review," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 83-90, July.
    14. Ariana Macieira & Joana Barbosa & Paula Teixeira, 2021. "Food Safety in Local Farming of Fruits and Vegetables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. de la Cruz, Vera Ysabel V. & Tantriani, & Cheng, Weiguo & Tawaraya, Keitaro, 2023. "Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Edouard Nicolas Rossi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Wiebke Jander & Sven Wydra & Johann Wackerbauer & Philipp Grundmann & Stephan Piotrowski, 2020. "Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Maria Wanic & Magdalena Jastrzębska & Marta K. Kostrzewska & Mariola Parzonka, 2024. "Spelt in Diversified and Spelt-Based Crop Rotations: Grain Yield and Technological and Nutritional Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Muhammad Atif Khan & Muhammad Asif Khan & Kishwar Ali & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2020. "Natural Resource Rent and Finance: The Moderation Role of Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16082-:d:1282986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.