IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p6172-d1538815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Closed-Loop Economy in the Meat Industry for Generating Alternative Energy from Biogas Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska

    (Department of Logistics, Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Robert Mroczek

    (Department of Agribusiness and Bioeconomy, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics National Research Institute, 00-002 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jadwiga Drożdż

    (Department of Agribusiness and Bioeconomy, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics National Research Institute, 00-002 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This study deals with the concept of a closed-loop economy in the meat industry through the use of animal by-products in biogas plants for electricity generation processes. The purpose of the study was to identify the volume of by-products from the slaughter of cattle and pigs, how the by-products are managed, and the efficiency of their use in biogas plants for electricity production processes. The analyses used data from the Central Statistical Office, the Chief Veterinary Inspectorate, and information obtained from the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development. Studies from the literature on closed-loop economies and bioeconomies were also a valuable source of information. Based on case studies, this paper also presents examples of a closed-loop economy in meat companies. In the area of pork, poultry, and beef livestock production, the analysis covered the years 2004–2022, while in the area of the production and use of meat industry by-products, the data came from 2017–2022. The study shows that reducing the production of waste in the meat industry and the reuse and recycling of waste are important parts of a closed-loop economy. In meat companies, waste from slaughtering animals can be properly managed, either by processing it into animal feed or by using it in biogas plants to generate electricity or heat. Taking into account the number of by-products from cattle and pig slaughter in the country, biogas plants could produce approximately 95,232 MW of electricity per year, which constitutes approximately 4.3% of the energy intensity of the meat industry in Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Robert Mroczek & Jadwiga Drożdż, 2024. "A Closed-Loop Economy in the Meat Industry for Generating Alternative Energy from Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6172-:d:1538815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2022. "Sustainable production: The economic returns of circular economy practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2603-2617, July.
    2. Li, Peiyuan & Wang, Dandan & Zafar, Quratulain & Waheed, Humayun, 2024. "Strategic resource management for economic sustainability: Assessing the impact of technological advancement and energy efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Heshmati, Almas, 2015. "A Review of the Circular Economy and its Implementation," IZA Discussion Papers 9611, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Tévécia Ronzon & Stephan Piotrowski & Saulius Tamosiunas & Lara Dammer & Michael Carus & Robert M’barek, 2020. "Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Borucka & Małgorzata Grzelak, 2025. "Deposit–Refund System as a Strategy to Drive Sustainable Energy Transition on the Example of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marko Lovec & Luka Juvančič, 2021. "The Role of Industrial Revival in Untapping the Bioeconomy’s Potential in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Fabiana Gatto & Sara Daniotti & Ilaria Re, 2021. "Driving Green Investments by Measuring Innovation Impacts. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Regional Bioeconomy Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Idiano D’Adamo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Maria Sonia Medina-Salgado & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "E-Commerce Calls for Cyber-Security and Sustainability: How European Citizens Look for a Trusted Online Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Moreira, María Teresa & González-García, Sara, 2023. "Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Sebasti'an Leavy & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Marco Antonio Montoya & Edson Talamini, 2024. "Measuring the bioeconomy economically: exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations," Papers 2403.08886, arXiv.org.
    6. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2020. "Circular Economy can Provide a Sustainable Global Society," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 9(3), pages 38-62, September.
    7. Fabio G. Santeramo & Monica Delsignore & Enrica Imbert & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2023. "The Future of the EU Bioenergy Sector: Economic, Environmental, Social, and Legislative Challenges," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 17(1), pages 1-1–52, April.
    8. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:478 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Nepal, Prakash & Runge, Troy & Bergman, Richard, 2023. "Environmental impacts and techno-economic assessments of biobased products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Tévécia Ronzon & Susanne Iost & George Philippidis, 2022. "Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8195-8217, June.
    12. £ukasz Ma³ys, 2023. "The approach to supply chain cooperation in the implementation of sustainable development initiatives and company’s economic performance," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 255-286, March.
    13. Dream D. Cazzaniga & Giulia Detomati, 2017. "Circular economy: Implementing a small-scale project in a rural area," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1-2), pages 191-217.
    14. Armand Kasztelan, 2020. "How Circular Are the European Economies? A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the INEC (Index of National Economies’ Circularity)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    15. Trigo, Eduardo & Chavarria, Hugo & Pray, Carl & Smyth, Stuart J & Torroba, Agustin & Wesseler, Justus & Zilberman, David & Martinez, Juan F., 2021. "The Bioeconomy and Food Systems Transformation: A View from the Americas," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315307, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Livio Ferrante & Anna Rita Germani, 2020. "Does Circular Economy Play a Key Role in Economic Growth?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 1855-1862.
    17. Juli Nurdiana & Maria Laura Franco-Garcia & Michiel Adriaan Heldeweg, 2021. "How Shall We Start? The Importance of General Indices for Circular Cities in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Monika Klein & Monika Spychalska-Wojtkiewicz, 2020. "Experience Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 9(1), pages 109-120.
    19. Ödül Bozkurt & Mirela Xheneti & Vicky, 2022. "On the Front Line of the Circular Economy: The Entrepreneurial, Identity and Institutional Work of a Female Entrepreneur towards the Circular Transition," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(1), pages 156-166, February.
    20. Jarmila Zimmermannova & Richard Smilnak & Michaela Perunova & Omar Ameir, 2022. "Coal or Biomass? Case Study of Consumption Behaviour of Households in the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    21. Kutay Cingiz & Hugo Gonzalez-Hermoso & Wim Heijman & Justus H. H. Wesseler, 2021. "A Cross-Country Measurement of the EU Bioeconomy: An Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-39, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6172-:d:1538815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.