IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15483-d1271639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Simulation Games for the Development of Intrinsic Motivation-Boosting Sustainability: Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Vélez

    (Department of Financial Economics II, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Rebeca Kerstin Alonso

    (Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain)

  • Markel Rico-González

    (Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The 4th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of the 2030 Agenda is supported by new educational trends that consider game-based learning as a pedagogical method in the classroom. In particular, simulation games and motivation are relevant elements since they can play a significant role in quality education. As a result, during the last few years, research into potential interventions as well as business simulation games (BSGs) for the development of intrinsic motivation (IM) in higher education have skyrocketed. However, no reviews of the interventions and outcomes in this topic have been released. Therefore, the goals of this research were (1) to analyze the relationship between the use of BSGs and the IM of students in higher education, and (2) to identify the aspects that can be promoted by the BSGs to develop IM. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA recommendations, a systematic review was carried out of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest. Results: From the 329 investigations that were initially selected, 12 studies underwent a complete assessment, in which all interventions and results were gathered and assessed. Conclusions: There was unanimity on the importance of using BSG to foster IM in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Vélez & Rebeca Kerstin Alonso & Markel Rico-González, 2023. "Business Simulation Games for the Development of Intrinsic Motivation-Boosting Sustainability: Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15483-:d:1271639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grijalvo, Mercedes & Segura, Alejandro & Núñez, Yilsy, 2022. "Computer-based business games in higher education: A proposal of a gamified learning framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Saskia Manshoven & Jeroen Gillabel, 2021. "Learning through Play: A Serious Game as a Tool to Support Circular Economy Education and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Dr Vinod Dumblekar, 2010. "Interpersonal Competitiveness - A Study Of Simulation Game Participants’ Behaviour," Paradigm, , vol. 14(2), pages 13-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Fulvio Signore & Maria Chiara De Lorenzi, 2023. "The Potential of Gamification for Social Sustainability: Meaning and Purposes in Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Salih Çevikarslan & Carsten Gelhard & Jörg Henseler, 2022. "Improving the Material and Financial Circularity of the Plastic Packaging Value Chain in The Netherlands: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Jingyuan Fu & Meng Sun & Minhong Wang, 2022. "Simulation-Assisted Learning about a Complex Economic System: Impact on Low- and High-Achieving Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Damjan Krajnc & Darko Kovačič & Eva Žunec & Kristijan Brglez & Rebeka Kovačič Lukman, 2022. "Youth Awareness and Attitudes towards a Circular Economy to Achieve the Green Deal Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Thomas, Nibu John & Baral, Rupashree & Crocco, Oliver S. & Mohanan, Swathi, 2023. "A framework for gamification in the metaverse era: How designers envision gameful experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Sandra Liliana Navarro-Parra & Andrés Chiappe, 2024. "Simulated Learning Environments as an Interdisciplinary Option for Vocational Training: A Systematic Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(2), pages 135-158, April.
    7. del Val Núñez, Maria Teresa & de Lucas Ancillo, Antonio & Gavrila Gavrila, Sorin & Gómez Gandía, José Andrés, 2024. "Technological transformation in HRM through knowledge and training: Innovative business decision making," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Zawar Shah & Shannon Kennedy-Clark & Yancong Xie & Md Shamsur Rahim & Mehregan Mahdavi & Andrew Levula, 2022. "Teacher Views on Teaching Sustainability in Higher Education Institutes in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Lars Strupeit & Nancy Bocken & Wim Opstal, 2024. "Towards a Circular Solar Power Sector: Experience with a Support Framework for Business Model Innovation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 2093-2118, September.
    10. Ana Bustamante-Mora & Mauricio Diéguez-Rebolledo & Yemsy Hormazábal & Yolanda Valdés & Rodrigo Cadena, 2023. "Learning Models for Higher Education in Engineering: Motivation, Self-Determination, and the Role of Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    11. María Fernández-Raga & Darija Aleksić & Aysun Kapucugil İkiz & Magdalena Markiewicz & Herbert Streit, 2023. "Development of a Comprehensive Process for Introducing Game-Based Learning in Higher Education for Lecturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15483-:d:1271639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.