IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13290-d1233136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Nima Karimi

    (Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 751 General Service Building, Edmonton, AB T5G 2H1, Canada)

Abstract

This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the collected documents) (48.7%), followed by North America (24.3%) and Europe (15.8%). Recycling emerged as the most effective alternative waste treatment method, representing 52.3% of the documented approaches, with industrial recycling (22.6%) and residential/nonresidential recycling (20.2%) as prominent categories. Food waste was a significant concern across regions, constituting 21.4% of the collected documents. Composting was widely adopted (15.4%) due to its simplicity and benefits for gardening and soil improvement. Other methods like biogas extraction, reusing, raising awareness, incinerating, redistributing, reducing, and fermentation accounted for 13.1% cumulatively. The study highlights the need for adopted waste management solutions based on regional challenges and successful practices. Promoting recycling infrastructure, composting, and waste reduction approaches are crucial to achieving sustainable waste management aligned with SDGs. Collaboration and knowledge sharing between regions are essential to improve inefficient waste management mechanisms. Integrating the findings into policymaking and industry practices can lead to a more sustainable future with reduced environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Nima Karimi, 2023. "Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13290-:d:1233136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13290/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13290/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amornchai Challcharoenwattana & Chanathip Pharino, 2018. "Analysis of Socioeconomic and Behavioral Factors Influencing Participation in Community-Based Recycling Program: A Case of Peri-Urban Town in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Daniele Eckert Matzembacher & Mervi Raudsaar & Marcia Dutra de Barcellos & Tõnis Mets, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Process: From Idea Generation to Impact Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Jacqueline Elizabeth Rutkowski & Emília Wanda Rutkowski, 2017. "Recycling in Brasil: Paper and Plastic Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Giovanni Vinti & Valerie Bauza & Thomas Clasen & Kate Medlicott & Terry Tudor & Christian Zurbrügg & Mentore Vaccari, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Management and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Alexander, Catherine & Smaje, Chris, 2008. "Surplus retail food redistribution: An analysis of a third sector model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 1290-1298.
    6. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Yanran Liu & Tingting Tian & Xinyu Hao & Qin Zhang & Chengyan Yao & Guangfu Liu, 2021. "Promotion of Household Waste Utilization in China: Lessons Learnt from Three Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shu-Hui Lan & Cheng-Tsu Huang, 2019. "Activity-Based Standard Costing Product-Mix Decision in the Future Digital Era: Green Recycling Steel-Scrap Material for Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, February.
    10. Patience Afi Seglah & Yajing Wang & Hongyan Wang & Yuyun Bi, 2019. "Estimation and Efficient Utilization of Straw Resources in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    12. Yin, Huajun & Zhao, Wenqiang & Li, Ting & Cheng, Xinying & Liu, Qing, 2018. "Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2695-2702.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Yufeng & Wang, Yapeng & Yang, Bin & Zheng, Zipeng & Wang, Chun & Chen, Bo & Li, Suiliang & Ying, Jilai & Liu, Xinping & Chen, Liang & Mu, Wenlong, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of straw collection, transportation and storage system for power generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    3. Bangxi Zhang & Tianhong Fu & Chung-Yu Guan & Shihao Cui & Beibei Fan & Yi Tan & Wenhai Luo & Quanquan Wei & Guoxue Li & Yutao Peng, 2022. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Chicken Manure Compost Using Tobacco Residue, Mushroom Bran, and Biochar as Additives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Zhai, Yijie & Zhang, Tianzuo & Ma, Xiaotian & Shen, Xiaoxu & Ji, Changxing & Bai, Yueyang & Hong, Jinglan, 2021. "Life cycle water footprint analysis of crop production in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Nie, Tangzhe & Huang, Jianyi & Zhang, Zhongxue & Chen, Peng & Li, Tiecheng & Dai, Changlei, 2023. "The inhibitory effect of a water-saving irrigation regime on CH4 emission in Mollisols under straw incorporation for 5 consecutive years," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Miloš Hitka & Silvia Lorincová & Milota Vetráková & Iveta Hajdúchová & Imrich Antalík, 2020. "Factors related to gender and education affecting the employee motivation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3226-3241, June.
    7. EiÄ aitÄ—, Ovidija & Baležentis, Tomas & RibaÅ¡auskienÄ—, Erika & MorkÅ«nas, Mangirdas & MelnikienÄ—, Rasa & Å treimikienÄ—, Dalia, 2022. "Food waste in the retail sector: A survey-based evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Jinwu Wang & Nuan Wen & Ziming Liu & Wenqi Zhou & Han Tang & Qi Wang & Jinfeng Wang, 2022. "Coupled Bionic Design of Liquid Fertilizer Deep Application Type Opener Based on Sturgeon Streamline to Enhance Opening Performance in Cold Soils of Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Amirhossein Taghipour & Wareerath Akkalatham, 2021. "Circular Economy of Steel Recycling Companies in Thailand," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 907-913, November.
    10. Xu, Xiaodong & Sielicki, Krzysztof & Min, Jiakang & Li, Jiaxin & Hao, Chuncheng & Wen, Xin & Chen, Xuecheng & Mijowska, Ewa, 2022. "One-step converting biowaste wolfberry fruits into hierarchical porous carbon and its application for high-performance supercapacitors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 187-195.
    11. González-Arias, Judith & González-Castaño, Miriam & Sánchez, Marta Elena & Cara-Jiménez, Jorge & Arellano-García, Harvey, 2022. "Valorization of biomass-derived CO2 residues with Cu-MnOx catalysts for RWGS reaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 443-451.
    12. Bingbing Huang & Hui Kong & Jinhong Yu & Xiaoyou Zhang, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Low-Carbon Technology Application in Agriculture on the Returns of Large-Scale Farmers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Nurin Asyikin Ahmad & Mohamad Sattar Rasul & Norasmah Othman & Nur Atiqah Jalaludin, 2022. "Generating Entrepreneurial Ideas for Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Zhang, Huan & Duan, Xianglei & Jiang, Jianli, 2024. "Fixed rebate subsidy vs. unit price subsidy: Incentive effect on the biomass power supply chain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Jutao Zeng & Jie Lyu, 2023. "Simultaneous Decisions to Undertake Off-Farm Work and Straw Return: The Role of Cognitive Ability," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek, 2024. "Optimisation of Biogas Production in the Co-Digestion of Pre-Hydrodynamically Cavitated Aerobic Granular Sludge with Waste Fats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Guillermo Alexis Vergel-Rangel & Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Raúl Horacio Camarillo-López & Jair Azael Esquivel-Guzmán & Francisco Pérez-Soto, 2021. "The environmental impact of nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica) production in Mexico City, Mexico through a life cycle assessment (LCA)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18068-18095, December.
    18. Nii Nelson & Jo Darkwa & John Calautit & Mark Worall & Robert Mokaya & Eunice Adjei & Francis Kemausuor & Julius Ahiekpor, 2021. "Potential of Bioenergy in Rural Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Vidas Raudonis & Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene & Linas Eidimtas, 2022. "ANN Hybrid Model for Forecasting Landfill Waste Potential in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Tõnis Mets & Jack Holbrook & Siim Läänelaid, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Education Challenges for Green Transformation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13290-:d:1233136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.