IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12964-d1227111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Literature Review of Research on Social Procurement in the Construction and Infrastructure Sector: Barriers, Enablers, and Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Xiaocui Lou

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Riccardo Natoli

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • David Goodwin

    (Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih 43500, Malaysia)

  • Barbara Bok

    (Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Fang Zhao

    (Tobin College of Business, St. John’s University, New York, NY 11432, USA)

  • Peng Zhang

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

Abstract

In Australia, a new feature of public policy is the requirement by governments that large-scale infrastructure projects integrate social procurement practices that alter the traditional focus on balancing price and quality. Social procurement has been gradually developing in practice, but the academic literature has not kept pace. Although past research has identified some of the barriers affecting social procurement implementation in the construction industry, the nature of the barriers impeding its proliferation has not to date been systematically reviewed. This paper undertakes a review of the social procurement literature published from January 2012 to 30 June 2022, with 49 papers chosen under selective criteria. This critical review employs the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) technique to retrieve secondary data on social procurement from available peer-reviewed academic papers through three databases (Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science). The literature analysis focuses on three themes: (1) barriers; (2) enablers; and (3) strategies to overcome the barriers. The paper finds that social procurement as a field of practice is evolving and expanding, but its role in contributing to social value creation remains an under-theorised concept. Recommendations for practice and future research are identified, including the need to measure the real-world impacts of policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Xiaocui Lou & Riccardo Natoli & David Goodwin & Barbara Bok & Fang Zhao & Peng Zhang, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Research on Social Procurement in the Construction and Infrastructure Sector: Barriers, Enablers, and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12964-:d:1227111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Mirza, Faisal Mehmood & Hou, Fujun & Ashraf, Rana Umair, 2019. "Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Daniella Troje, 2021. "Policy in Practice: Social Procurement Policies in the Swedish Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Muhammad Waris & Shrikant Panigrahi & Abdullah Mengal & Mujeeb Iqbal Soomro & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Mehfooz Ullah & Zarith Sufia Azlan & Asadullah Khan, 2019. "An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Sustainable Procurement of Construction Equipment: Multicriteria-Based Decision Framework for Malaysia," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, September.
    4. Daniella Troje & Pernilla Gluch, 2020. "Beyond Policies and Social Washing: How Social Procurement Unfolds in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. George Denny-Smith & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Martin Loosemore & Megan Williams & Leanne Piggott, 2021. "How Construction Employment Can Create Social Value and Assist Recovery from COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. J. Barraket & M. Loosemore, 2018. "Co-creating social value through cross-sector collaboration between social enterprises and the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 394-408, July.
    7. Craig Furneaux & Jo Barraket, 2014. "Purchasing social good(s): a definition and typology of social procurement," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 265-272, July.
    8. Martin Loosemore & Jemma Bridgeman & Hugh Russell & Suhair Zaid Alkilani, 2021. "Preventing Youth Homelessness through Social Procurement in Construction: A Capability Empowerment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Barbara Allen, 2021. "Broader outcomes in procurement policy – a case of New Zealand pragmatism," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 318-341, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Natoli & Catherine Xiaocui Lou & David Goodwin, 2023. "Addressing Barriers to Social Procurement Implementation in the Construction and Transportation Industries: An Ecosystem Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Daniella Troje, 2021. "Policy in Practice: Social Procurement Policies in the Swedish Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    4. Salik Uddin Ahmed & Amjad Ali & Abdul Hameed Memon & Ahmad Hussain, 2021. "Policy framework for implementation of sustainable procurement practices in healthcare industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3929-3945, March.
    5. Lauma Balode & Kristiāna Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2021. "The Contradictions between District and Individual Heating towards Green Deal Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Ionica Oncioiu & Ioana Duca & Mirela Anca Postole & Georgiana Camelia Georgescu (Crețan) & Rodica Gherghina & Robert-Adrian Grecu, 2021. "Transforming the COVID-19 Threat into an Opportunity: The Pandemic as a Stage to the Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Renata C. A. Mendonça & Ivo V. Pedrosa & Maria Amália O. A. Camara, 2021. "Sustainable public procurement in a Brazilian higher education institution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 17094-17125, November.
    8. Syrus M Islam, 2022. "Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 298-321, May.
    9. George Lăzăroiu & Luminița Ionescu & Cristian Uță & Iulian Hurloiu & Mihai Andronie & Irina Dijmărescu, 2020. "Environmentally Responsible Behavior and Sustainability Policy Adoption in Green Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Liangze Ma & Rana Umair Ashraf & Muhammad Ahtisham ul Haq & Xianhua Fan, 2022. "Hurdles on the Way to Sustainable Development in the Education Sector of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Wen-Hsiang Chiu & Wen-Cheng Lin & Chun-Nan Chen & Nien-Ping Chen, 2021. "Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process to Analyze the Development of the Green Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Islam, Syrus M., 2020. "Unintended consequences of scaling social impact through ecosystem growth strategy in social enterprise and social entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    13. Ana R. Leal & David Perez-Castillo & José Ernesto Amorós & Bryan W. Husted, 2020. "Municipal Green Purchasing in Mexico: Policy Adoption and Implementation Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Rezaee Vessal, Saeedeh & Partouche-Sebban, Judith & Schiavone, Francesco & Raïes, Karine, 2022. "We link, you link: Social alliances and community engagement among vulnerable consumers in oncology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 36-45.
    15. Akhmad Mustafa & Rachman Syah & Mudian Paena & Ketut Sugama & Endhay Kusnendar Kontara & Irwan Muliawan & Hidayat Suryanto Suwoyo & Andi Indra Jaya Asaad & Ruzkiah Asaf & Erna Ratnawati & Admi Athirah, 2023. "Strategy for Developing Whiteleg Shrimp ( Litopenaeus vannamei ) Culture Using Intensive/Super-Intensive Technology in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Harsha Nayanatharangee Dharmarathna Kuruppu Arachchige & Salwa Mohd Ishak & Ki Pyung Kim, 2023. "Exploring Indicators for Sustainable Shovel-Ready Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Michiel Zijp & Erik Dekker & Mara Hauck & Arjan De Koning & Marijn Bijleveld & Janot Tokaya & Elias De Valk & Anne Hollander & Leo Posthuma, 2022. "Measuring the Effect of Circular Public Procurement on Government’s Environmental Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    19. Mehfooz Ullah & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Lee Chia Kuang & Ammar Hussain & Faisal Rana & Asadullah Khan & Mirza Rizwan Sajid, 2020. "A Structural Model for the Antecedents of Sustainable Project Management in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Daniel Etse & Adela McMurray & Nuttawuth Muenjohn, 2022. "The Effect of Regulation on Sustainable Procurement: Organisational Leadership and Culture as Mediators," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 305-325, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12964-:d:1227111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.