IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12367-d1217175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation System Creation and Application of “Zero-Pollution Village” Based on Combined FAHP-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Xu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Meiyan Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yicheng Xu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Xin Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Yun Wu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Fang’ai Chi

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

With the implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy, the construction of low-pollution villages has become an urgent demand for rural residents to achieve an ecologically livable environment. This paper aims to construct a new evaluation system for a “zero-pollution village” inspired by the principle of CASBEE. A village is regarded as a relatively independent ecosystem, and the evaluation system is designed to improve the “internal environmental quality Q” of a village while reducing the “external environmental load L”. Thus, the evaluation system included two target strata (Q and L) and 3 layers comprising 6 criteria layers, 21 sub-criteria layers, and 76 indicators in the indicator layers. A new combined weight method based on FAHP-TOPSIS was presented to determine the weights of each layer of indicators. After verifying the evaluation system by applying it to 3 representative villages, 26 villages in Zhejiang Province were evaluated. These results indicate that the evaluation system was effective for evaluating the construction of a zero-pollution village. The current village environment in Zhejiang Province has been significantly improved; however, the vast majority of villages have not yet reached the zero-pollution standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Xu & Meiyan Wang & Yicheng Xu & Xin Li & Yun Wu & Fang’ai Chi, 2023. "Evaluation System Creation and Application of “Zero-Pollution Village” Based on Combined FAHP-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12367-:d:1217175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, Thomas L., 1978. "Modeling unstructured decision problems — the theory of analytical hierarchies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 147-158.
    2. Anelli, Debora & Tajani, Francesco, 2023. "Spatial decision support systems for effective ex-ante risk evaluation: An innovative model for improving the real estate redevelopment processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Li, Honglian & Huang, Jin & Hu, Yao & Wang, Shangyu & Liu, Jing & Yang, Liu, 2021. "A new TMY generation method based on the entropy-based TOPSIS theory for different climatic zones in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Ferrari, S. & Zoghi, M. & Blázquez, T. & Dall’O’, G., 2022. "New Level(s) framework: Assessing the affinity between the main international Green Building Rating Systems and the european scheme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.
    2. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    3. Leanda C. Garvie & David J. Lee & Biljana Kulišić, 2024. "Towards a Bioeconomy: Supplying Forest Residues for the Australian Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    6. Jiaxiang Lei & Honglian Li & Chengwang Li & Minrui Xu, 2023. "A New Method for Determining Outdoor Humidity Ratio of Natatorium in Transition Season," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Sujuan Li & Jiaguo Liu & Xiyuan Hu, 2023. "A three-dimensional evaluation model for green development: evidence from Chinese provinces along the belt and road," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11557-11581, October.
    8. Rubina Canesi & Beatrice Gallo, 2023. "Risk Assessment in Sustainable Infrastructure Development Projects: A Tool for Mitigating Cost Overruns," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Muna A. Al-Ansari & Hamad Nabeel & Galal M. Abdella & Tarek El Mekkawy & Adeeb A. Kutty, 2024. "A Non-Parametric Approach-Based Trade-Off between Food System Efficiency and Robustness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Manganelli Benedetto & Anelli Debora & Tajani Francesco & Morano Pierluigi, 2024. "Capitalization Rate and Real Estate Risk Factors: An Analysis of the Relationships for the Residential Market in the City of Rome (Italy)," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 32(3), pages 101-115.
    11. Meiyan Wang & Chen Chen & Bingxin Fan & Zilu Yin & Wenxuan Li & Huifang Wang & Fang’ai Chi, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Envelope Design of Rural Tourism Buildings in Southeastern Coastal Areas of China Based on NSGA-II Algorithm and Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Libiao Bai & Kanyin Zheng & Zhiguo Wang & Jiale Liu, 2022. "Service provider portfolio selection for project management using a BP neural network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 41-62, January.
    13. Kang Xu & Jiuping Xu, 2020. "A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 359-388, September.
    14. Liu, Jicheng & Lu, Yunyuan, 2023. "A task matching model of photovoltaic storage system under the energy blockchain environment - based on GA-CLOUD-GS algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    15. Ergu, Daji & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi & Shi, Yong, 2011. "A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 246-259, August.
    16. Pranith K. Roy & Krishnendu Shaw, 2023. "A credit scoring model for SMEs using AHP and TOPSIS," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 372-391, January.
    17. Feng, Meiqing & Chen, Yaning & Duan, Weili & Fang, Gonghuan & li, Zhi & Jiao, Li & Sun, Fan & Li, Yupeng & Hou, Yifeng, 2022. "Comprehensive evaluation of the water-energy-food nexus in the agricultural management of the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Li, Guoqi & Pu, Gang & Yang, Jiaxin & Jiang, Xinguo, 2024. "A multidimensional quantitative risk assessment framework for dense areas of stay points for urban HazMat vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Emete Toros & Yavuz Gazibey, 2018. "Priorities of the citizens in city brand development: comparison of two cities (Nicosia and Kyrenia) by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 413-437, December.
    20. Zhaoxi Zhan & Wenna Xu & Lin Xu & Xinyue Qi & Wenjie Song & Chen Wang & Ziye Huang, 2022. "BIM-Based Green Hospital Building Performance Pre-Evaluation: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12367-:d:1217175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.