IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12208-d1213966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Waste Management and Prediction through Socio-Economic Values and Visualizing the Spatiotemporal Relationship on an Advanced GIS-Based Dashboard

Author

Listed:
  • Shixiong Xu

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Sara Shirowzhan

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Samad M. E. Sepasgozar

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Enhancing data-driven decision-making is vital for waste authorities. Although few studies have explored the influence of socio-economic indicators on waste tonnage, comprehensive analysis of urban waste data focusing on geographical information is also scarce. There is a dearth of dashboards for visualizing waste tonnage with spatial relationship maps. This study aims to present a prediction model useful for estimating urban waste by using personal income (I), the number of income earners (E), land values (L), the estimated resident population (P) and population density (D), called the IELPD measures. An innovative approach is developed to identify the correlation between urban household waste data and socio-economic factors and develop an advanced dashboard based on a geographic information system (GIS). To accomplish this, relationship maps and regression analysis are deployed to visualize household waste data spanning six years of waste production in New South Wales, Australia, classified into three categories: recyclable, residual and organic (RRO) wastes. Furthermore, this classification enables accessing the association between these three waste categories and the IELPD metrics. And there are four types of visualization generated, that is, thematic mapping, spatial relationship maps, correlation matrices and dashboard development. The regression analysis shows a substantial association between RRO waste tonnage, population changes and a minor correlation with land values. Overall, this study contributes to urban waste data storytelling and its spatiotemporal associations with socio-economic determinants. This paper offers a valuable prediction model of the IELPD metrics to estimate urban waste and visualize them in a dashboard allowing practitioners and decision-makers to track trends in the RRO waste stream in urban waste generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixiong Xu & Sara Shirowzhan & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2023. "Urban Waste Management and Prediction through Socio-Economic Values and Visualizing the Spatiotemporal Relationship on an Advanced GIS-Based Dashboard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-38, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12208-:d:1213966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agovino, Massimiliano & Musella, Gaetano, 2020. "Separate waste collection in mountain municipalities. A case study in Campania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Khanali, Majid & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan & Varmazyar, Hossein & Mohammadkashi, Naghmeh & Chau, Kwok-wing & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan, 2022. "Applying novel eco-exergoenvironmental toxicity index to select the best irrigation system of sunflower production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Keihan Hassanzadehkermanshahi & Sara Shirowzhan, 2022. "Measuring Urban Sustainability over Time at National and Regional Scale for Addressing United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11: Iran and Tehran as Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leng Liu & Bo Liu & Wei Song & Hao Yu, 2023. "The Relationship between Rural Sustainability and Land Use: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Jakub Żywiec & Dawid Szpak & Izabela Piegdoń & Krzysztof Boryczko & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak & Janusz Rak, 2023. "An Approach to Assess the Water Resources Reliability and Its Management," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Wang, Dandan & Li, Yusheng & Yang, Yongge & Hayase, Shuzi & Wu, Haifeng & Wang, Ruixiang & Ding, Chao & Shen, Qing, 2023. "How to minimize voltage and fill factor losses to achieve over 20% efficiency lead chalcogenide quantum dot solar cells: Strategies expected through numerical simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    4. Deng, Lei & Shi, Congling & Li, Haoran & Wan, Mei & Ren, Fei & Hou, Yanan & Tang, Fei, 2023. "Prediction of energy mass loss rate for biodiesel fire via machine learning and its physical modeling of flame radiation evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Montalvo-Navarrete, Juan M. & Lasso-Palacios, Ana P., 2024. "Energy access sustainability criteria definition for Colombian rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    6. Yang, Ning & Sheng, Xueru & Ti, Liting & Jia, Haiyuan & Ping, Qingwei & Li, Ning, 2023. "Ball-milling transesterification process on biodiesel production: RSM optimization, life cycle assessment and market dynamics analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Safiyeh Tayebi & Seyed Ali Alavi & Saeed Esfandi & Leyla Meshkani & Aliakbar Shamsipour, 2023. "Evaluation of Land Use Efficiency in Tehran’s Expansion between 1986 and 2021: Developing an Assessment Framework Using DEMATEL and Interpretive Structural Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Wang, Kechao & Xiao, Wu & He, Tingting & Zhang, Maoxin, 2024. "Remote sensing unveils the explosive growth of global offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Duan, Cong & Li, Chunli, 2023. "Energy-saving improvement of heat integration for separating dilute azeotropic components in extractive distillation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    10. Zuo, Qingsong & Li, Qiming & Yang, Xiaomei & Chen, Wei & Zhu, Guohui & Shen, Zhuang & Xie, Yong & Tang, Yuanyou, 2023. "Investigation of electrically heating catalytic converter flow and temperature field performance improvement based on field synergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Syafrudin Syafrudin & Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Munawir Munawir & Hafizhul Khair & Raden Tina Rosmalina & Septa Yudha Ardiansyah, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Illegal Waste Dumping Generation Using GIS Spatial Regression Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Li, Guohao & Chen, Xue & You, Xue-yi, 2023. "System dynamics prediction and development path optimization of regional carbon emissions: A case study of Tianjin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Zhao, Qiaonan & Liu, Feng & Jiao, Anyao & Yang, Qiguo & Xu, Hongtao & Liao, Xiaowei, 2023. "Prediction model of NOx emissions in the heavy-duty gas turbine combustor based on MILD combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Zhu, Hongmei & He, Donglin & Duan, Hao & Yin, Hong & Chen, Yafei & Chao, Xing & Zhang, Xianming & Gong, Haifeng, 2023. "Study on coupled combustion behaviors and kinetics of plastic pyrolysis by-product for oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    15. Feiyu Hou & Dunhu Chang & Qinxia Wang, 2022. "Assessment of the Sustainability of the Resource-Based Province Shanxi, China Using Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Esmanur Uçal & Hasan Yildizhan & Arman Ameen & Zafer Erbay, 2023. "Assessment of Whole Milk Powder Production by a Cumulative Exergy Consumption Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12208-:d:1213966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.