IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11611-d1204010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligent Manufacturing and Value Creation in Enterprises: Lessons from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in a Chinese Demonstration Project

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao-Zhen Zhu

    (School of Accounting, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233041, China)

  • Yue Chen

    (School of Accounting, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233041, China)

  • Jiang Zhao

    (School of Business, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312010, China)

  • Zhu-Ying Yu

    (School of Law, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 210017, China)

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of contemporary information technologies, intelligent manufacturing has emerged as a pivotal direction in the global technological transformation. To empirically examine the impact of intelligent manufacturing on enterprise value creation, this article conducts quasi-natural experiments using Chinese intelligent manufacturing demonstration projects as a sample. Specifically, it focuses on Chinese A-share-listed manufacturing enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011 to 2020. According to the report, the implementation of intelligent manufacturing has a positive influence on enterprise value production. This conclusion remains robust even after undergoing a rigorous testing procedure. Mechanism analysis further reveals that alleviating financial constraints and fostering technological innovation are the two primary avenues through which intelligent manufacturing enhances enterprise value creation. Moreover, the study indicates that regions with favorable business environments experience a more conspicuous boost in enterprise value generation due to intelligent manufacturing. Additionally, businesses in the growth stage are more significantly affected by this phenomenon. Overall, this research not only contributes to the existing body of knowledge on this subject but also offers empirical evidence to support businesses in their endeavors to enhance value creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao-Zhen Zhu & Yue Chen & Jiang Zhao & Zhu-Ying Yu, 2023. "Intelligent Manufacturing and Value Creation in Enterprises: Lessons from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in a Chinese Demonstration Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11611-:d:1204010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Petra E. Todd, 1997. "Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 64(4), pages 605-654.
    2. Granja, João & Makridis, Christos & Yannelis, Constantine & Zwick, Eric, 2022. "Did the paycheck protection program hit the target?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 725-761.
    3. Decai Tang & Luxia Wang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2021. "An Evaluation of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Manufacturing Industry Level of Intelligentization and Influencing Factors: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Lipeng Sun & Nur Ashikin Mohd Saat, 2023. "How Does Intelligent Manufacturing Affect the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 197-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    7. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    8. Joshi, Aditi D. & Gupta, Surendra M., 2019. "Evaluation of design alternatives of End-Of-Life products using internet of things," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 281-293.
    9. Iain M. Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson & Scott Stern, 2018. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 24449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    11. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "How Research in Production and Operations Management May Evolve in the Era of Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1670-1684, September.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series dp-298, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    13. Huan Chen & Tingyong Zhong & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Capacity Reduction Pressure, Financing Constraints, and Enterprise Sustainable Innovation Investment: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Shan Wu & Jinlong Zhang, 2021. "Research on a Compound Dual Innovation Capability Model of Intelligent Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Lei & Ping Xie, 2024. "Fostering Enterprise Innovation: The Impact of China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10412-10441, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hua & Liao, Lingtao & Wu, Ji (George), 2023. "Robot adoption and firm's capacity utilization: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    3. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 139-159.
    4. Johnson, Prince Chacko & Laurell, Christofer & Ots, Mart & Sandström, Christian, 2022. "Digital innovation and the effects of artificial intelligence on firms’ research and development – Automation or augmentation, exploration or exploitation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Jay Dixon & Bryan Hong & Lynn Wu, 2021. "The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5586-5605, September.
    6. Martin Obschonka & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a new era has begun," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 529-539, October.
    7. Dominic Chalmers & Niall G. MacKenzie & Sara Carter, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Venture Creation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1028-1053, September.
    8. Xueyuan Gao & Hua Feng, 2023. "AI-Driven Productivity Gains: Artificial Intelligence and Firm Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Haile, Getinet Astatike, 2018. "Organisational Accreditation and Worker Upskilling in Britain," IZA Discussion Papers 11479, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Azar, José & Alekseeva, Liudmila & Gine, Mireia & Samila, Sampsa & Taska, Bledi, 2020. "The Demand for AI Skills in the Labor Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 14320, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Xiang Hui & Oren Reshef & Luofeng Zhou, 2023. "The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 10601, CESifo.
    12. Getinet Astatike Haile, 2021. "Organisational accreditation, workforce training and perceptions of performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 291-314, July.
    13. Gilbert Cette & Lorraine Koehl & Thomas Philippon, 2019. "The Labor Share in the Long Term: A Decline?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 510-511-5, pages 35-51.
    14. Estrada, Mario Arturo Ruiz & Park, Donghyun & Staniewski, Marcin, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) can change the way of doing policy modelling," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1099-1112.
    15. Mahmut Ozer & Matjaž Perc, 2020. "Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. David Rezza Baqaee & Emmanuel Farhi, 2018. "Macroeconomics with Heterogeneous Agents and Input-Output Networks," NBER Working Papers 24684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    18. repec:eur:ejesjr:364 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Zilian, Laura S. & Zilian, Stella S. & Jäger, Georg, 2021. "Labour market polarisation revisited: evidence from Austrian vacancy data," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 55, pages 1-7.
    20. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    21. Heyman, Fredrik & Olsson, Martin, 2022. "Long-Run Effects of Technological Change: The Impact of Automation and Robots on Intergenerational Mobility," Working Paper Series 1451, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 29 Jun 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11611-:d:1204010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.