IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11586-d1203574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Earthquake Scheduling of Rescuers: A Method Considering Multiple Disaster Areas and Rescuer Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Pingping Cao

    (Department of Basic Teaching and Research, Criminal Investigation Police University of China, Shenyang 110854, China)

  • Jin Zheng

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Business School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Mingyang Li

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Business School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Reasonable and efficient scheduling of rescuers plays a crucial role in earthquake emergency relief, which can effectively reduce disaster losses and promote social stability and sustainable development. Due to the suddenness of disasters, the urgency of time, and the complexity of rescue efforts, scheduling of rescuers often involves multiple disaster areas, multiple departure areas, and diverse rescue tasks. However, most existing studies have paid little attention to the scheduling problem of rescuers considering multiple disaster areas, multiple departure areas, and multiple rescue tasks and have not comprehensively considered the collaboration of rescuers and task requirements. Thus, how to reasonably dispatch rescuers to disaster areas by considering the collaboration of rescuers and task needs is a noteworthy research problem. The objective of this paper is to propose a method considering multiple disaster areas and the collaboration of rescuers to solve the scheduling problem of rescuers after earthquakes. Firstly, the collaborative degrees of rescuers are calculated according to the collaborative performance among rescuers concerning collaborative feature indicators. Secondly, according to the performance of rescuers concerning professional skill evaluation indicators, the professional abilities of rescuers are calculated, and the comprehensive performance indicators for rescuers are obtained by aggregating the collaborative degrees and the professional abilities of rescuers. Thirdly, the time satisfaction degrees are calculated based on the times taken by rescuers from different departure areas to disaster areas and the time requirements of disaster areas. Then, the time satisfaction degrees and the comprehensive performance of rescuers are aggregated to obtain the comprehensive matching degrees. Furthermore, a rescuer scheduling model for earthquake emergency rescue is constructed to maximize the comprehensive matching degrees between rescuers and rescue tasks, and the optimal scheduling scheme is determined by solving the model. Finally, a case study and comparative analyses are presented to verify the rationality and feasibility of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can reasonably assign rescuers to quickly respond to the needs of rescue tasks in disaster areas, and is better than the other two methods in terms of rescue comprehensive capability evaluation. The proposed method can provide decision support for solving the post-earthquake scheduling problem of rescuers and help to improve the emergency response ability for large-scale geological disaster events.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingping Cao & Jin Zheng & Mingyang Li, 2023. "Post-Earthquake Scheduling of Rescuers: A Method Considering Multiple Disaster Areas and Rescuer Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11586-:d:1203574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wex, Felix & Schryen, Guido & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2014. "Emergency response in natural disaster management: Allocation and scheduling of rescue units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 697-708.
    2. Knight, V.A. & Harper, P.R. & Smith, L., 2012. "Ambulance allocation for maximal survival with heterogeneous outcome measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 918-926.
    3. Sining Huang & Yupeng Chen & Xusheng Feng & Tiantian Qiao & Dandan Yu & Yongqiang Yang, 2022. "Research on Dynamic Assessment Method of Earthquake Scene Rescue Performance Based on AHP and Cloud Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    5. Pingping Cao & Jin Zheng & Mingyang Li & Yu Fu, 2023. "A Model for the Assignment of Emergency Rescuers Considering Collaborative Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Peijia Ren & Zeshui Xu & Jing Gu, 2016. "Assessments of the Effectiveness of an Earthquake Emergency Plan Implementation with Hesitant Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1367-1389, November.
    7. Xiang Chu & QiuYan Zhong, 2015. "Post-earthquake allocation approach of medical rescue teams," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1809-1824, December.
    8. Sperling, Martina & Schryen, Guido, 2022. "Decision support for disaster relief: Coordinating spontaneous volunteers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 690-705.
    9. Fujiang Chen & Jingang Liu & Junying Chen & Zhihan Lv, 2021. "Earthquake Disaster Rescue Model Based on Complex Adaptive System Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, February.
    10. Xinxin Yan & Hanping Hou & Jianliang Yang & Jiaqi Fang, 2021. "Site Selection and Layout of Material Reserve Based on Emergency Demand Graduation under Large-Scale Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pingping Cao & Jin Zheng & Mingyang Li & Yu Fu, 2023. "A Model for the Assignment of Emergency Rescuers Considering Collaborative Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Ling Tan & Ji Guo & Selvarajah Mohanarajah & Kun Zhou, 2021. "Can we detect trends in natural disaster management with artificial intelligence? A review of modeling practices," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2389-2417, July.
    3. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Atefe Baghaian & M. M. Lotfi & Shabnam Rezapour, 2022. "Integrated deployment of local urban relief teams in the first hours after mass casualty incidents," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4517-4555, September.
    5. Zhang, Y. & Weng, W.G. & Huang, Z.L., 2018. "A scenario-based model for earthquake emergency management effectiveness evaluation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 197-207.
    6. Cejun Cao & Congdong Li & Qin Yang & Fanshun Zhang, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization Model of Emergency Organization Allocation for Sustainable Disaster Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Lotfi, M.M. & Baghaian, Atefe & Ruiz, Rubén & Rezapour, Shabnam, 2020. "Mass casualty management in disaster scene: A systematic review of OR&MS research in humanitarian operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 787-819.
    8. Jian Wang & Yin Wang & Mingzhu Yu, 2022. "A multi-period ambulance location and allocation problem in the disaster," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 909-932, July.
    9. Nadide Caglayan & Sule Itir Satoglu, 2021. "Multi-Objective Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for a Proposed Casualty Transportation System in Large-Scale Disasters: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Albores, Pavel & Brewster, Christopher, 2018. "Disaster preparedness in humanitarian logistics: A collaborative approach for resource management in floods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 978-993.
    11. Liu, Qiong & He, Renfei & Zhang, Limao, 2022. "Simulation-based multi-objective optimization for enhanced safety of fire emergency response in metro stations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Jian Wang & Yin Wang & Mingzhu Yu, 0. "A multi-period ambulance location and allocation problem in the disaster," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    13. Yiping Jiang & Yufei Yuan, 2019. "Emergency Logistics in a Large-Scale Disaster Context: Achievements and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Souza, Juliano Silva & Lim-Apo, Flávio Araújo & Varella, Leonardo & Coelho, Antônio Sérgio & Souza, João Carlos, 2022. "Multi-period optimization model for planning people allocation in shelters and distributing aid with special constraints," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Michael R. Miller & Robert J. Alexander & Vincent A. Arbige & Robert F. Dell & Steven R. Kremer & Brian P. McClune & Jane E. Oppenlander & Joshua P. Tomlin, 2017. "Optimal Allocation of Students to Naval Nuclear-Power Training Units," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 320-335, August.
    16. Fattahi, Mohammad & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Kannan, Devika & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Resource planning strategies for healthcare systems during a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 192-206.
    17. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    18. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    19. Araya-Córdova, P.J. & Vásquez, Óscar C., 2018. "The disaster emergency unit scheduling problem to control wildfires," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 311-317.
    20. David Simchi-Levi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Peter Yun Zhang, 2019. "Designing Response Supply Chain Against Bioattacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1246-1268, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11586-:d:1203574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.