IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11386-d1199739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can We Promote Smartphone Leasing via a Buyback Program?

Author

Listed:
  • Gaidi Tian

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Chunfa Li

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

Abstract

Leasing is an important sustainable PSS model of recycling smartphones, and they have emerged as a crucial component of retailers’ business evolution in recent times. Using hybrid selling–leasing transformations, retailers not only provide selling services but also leasing services, which not only increases revenue sources but also triggers internal competition. Due to this, retailers are reluctant to promote smartphone leasing. How can we enhance retailers’ motivation to promote smartphone leasing? This paper aims to answer this question by exploring the potential of a manufacturer’s buyback program and analyzing three price decision models: pure selling (S), hybrid selling–leasing without a buyback program (SL), and hybrid selling–leasing with a buyback program (HSL). The results show that (1) when consumers’ acceptance of leasing is moderate, retailers can benefit from hybrid selling–leasing transformation. (2) If the manufacturer chooses to buy back used leasing smartphones from the retailer, it is advisable to set a high buyback price that is at least equal to their residual value. (3) The buyback program can increase consumers’ leasing demand and manufacturer’s profits, as well as decrease the environmental impact of the supply chain system. More importantly, it has the potential to drive retailers to conduct hybrid selling–leasing transformation and can establish a positive correlation between retailers’ profits and consumers’ acceptance of leasing. This means that buyback programs can promote smartphone leasing and can be beneficial for smartphone recycling and urban sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaidi Tian & Chunfa Li, 2023. "How Can We Promote Smartphone Leasing via a Buyback Program?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11386-:d:1199739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    2. Paria Akbary & Mohammad Ghiasi & Mohammad Reza Rezaie Pourkheranjani & Hamidreza Alipour & Noradin Ghadimi, 2019. "Extracting Appropriate Nodal Marginal Prices for All Types of Committed Reserve," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Li, Duan & Yan, Houmin, 2008. "Mean-variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under a returns policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 356-376, January.
    4. Yu, Yugang & Dong, Yuxuan & Guo, Xiaolong, 2018. "Pricing for sales and per-use rental services with vertical differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 586-598.
    5. Preyas S. Desai & Devavrat Purohit, 1999. "Competition in Durable Goods Markets: The Strategic Consequences of Leasing and Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 42-58.
    6. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2005. "Selling and Leasing Strategies for Durable Goods with Complementary Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1278-1290, August.
    7. Chen, Jing, 2011. "The impact of sharing customer returns information in a supply chain with and without a buyback policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 478-488, September.
    8. Zhenfeng Liu & Ya Xiao & Jian Feng, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Sharing Servitization Transformation and Product Pricing Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Flora Poppelaars & Conny Bakker & Jo Van Engelen, 2018. "Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Lau, Hon-Shiang & Lau, Amy Hing-Ling, 1999. "Manufacturer's pricing strategy and return policy for a single-period commodity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 291-304, July.
    11. Gökçe Esenduran & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2020. "Buyback Pricing of Durable Goods in Dual Distribution Channels," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 412-428, March.
    12. Gaidi Tian & Chunfa Li & Dongdong Li & Conghu Liu, 2022. "How Does the Electronic Products Retailer Transform Operational Modes Considering Consumer Preferences for Leasing?," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-17, September.
    13. Monire Jalili & Michael S. Pangburn, 2020. "Pricing Joint Sales and Rentals: When are Purchase Conversion Discounts Optimal?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2679-2695, December.
    14. Barry Alan Pasternack, 1985. "Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 166-176.
    15. Devavrat Purohit, 1997. "Dual Distribution Channels: The Competition Between Rental Agencies and Dealers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 228-245.
    16. Doganoglu, Toker & Inceoglu, Firat, 2020. "Buyback contracts to solve upstream opportunism," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 875-884.
    17. Vishal V. Agrawal & Ioannis Bellos, 2017. "The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1545-1562, May.
    18. Weili Xue & Yulin Hu & Zhiyuan Chen, 2019. "The value of buyback contract under price competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2679-2694, May.
    19. Ji, Xiang & Sun, Jiasen & Wang, Zebin, 2017. "Turn bad into good: Using transshipment-before-buyback for disruptions of stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 150-161.
    20. Zhao, Yingxue & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E. & Sethi, Suresh P. & Wang, Shouyang, 2014. "Buyback contracts with price-dependent demands: Effects of demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 663-673.
    21. Hing-Ling Lau, Amy & Lau, Hon-Shiang & Willett, Keith D., 2000. "Demand uncertainty and returns policies for a seasonal product: An alternative model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Jose A. Guajardo & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Business Models in the Sharing Economy: Manufacturing Durable Goods in the Presence of Peer-to-Peer Rental Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1450-1469, December.
    2. Kanatlı, Mehmet Ali & Karaer, Özgen, 2022. "Servitization as an alternative business model and its implications on product durability, profitability & environmental impact," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 546-560.
    3. Ohmura, Shota & Matsuo, Hirofumi, 2016. "The effect of risk aversion on distribution channel contracts: Implications for return policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 29-40.
    4. Haitao Chen & Qiang Xu & Zhaohui Dong & Hetian Zhao, 2023. "Recycling Versus Leasing in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: A Comparative Analysis Anchored on Consumer Ownership Perceptions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    5. Jafar Heydari & Tsan-Ming Choi & Saghi Radkhah, 2017. "Pareto Improving Supply Chain Coordination Under a Money-Back Guarantee Service Program," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 91-105, June.
    6. Alegoz, Mehmet & Karaer, Özgen, 2024. "Compound effect of closing the loop and servitization in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Lin Tian & Baojun Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Entry in the Product-Sharing Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 553-568, May.
    8. Pangburn, Michael S. & Stavrulaki, Euthemia, 2014. "Take back costs and product durability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 175-184.
    9. Wang, Yulan & Zipkin, Paul, 2009. "Agents' incentives under buy-back contracts in a two-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 525-539, August.
    10. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lu, Yu-Ting, 2010. "Manufacturer's return policy in a two-stage supply chain with two risk-averse retailers and random demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 514-523, November.
    11. Feng, Yixuan & Tan, Yinliang (Ricky) & Duan, Yongrui & Bai, Yu, 2020. "Strategies analysis of luxury fashion rental platform in sharing economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Chomachaei, Fahimeh & Gal-Or, Esther & Letizia, Paolo & Roma, Paolo, 2024. "The economic viability of the sharing economy business model and its environmental impact," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1197-1209.
    13. Chen Jin & Luyi Yang & Cungen Zhu, 2023. "Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1017-1036, February.
    14. Jörnsten, Kurt & Lise Nonås, Sigrid & Sandal, Leif & Ubøe, Jan, 2012. "Transfer of risk in the newsvendor model with discrete demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 404-414.
    15. Ece G. Gülserliler & Joseph D. Blackburn & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2022. "Consumer acceptance of circular business models and potential effects on economic performance: The case of washing machines," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 509-521, April.
    16. Yingxue Zhao & Tsan-Ming Choi & T. C. E. Cheng & Shouyang Wang, 2017. "Mean-risk analysis of wholesale price contracts with stochastic price-dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 491-518, October.
    17. Andrikopoulos, Athanasios & Markellos, Raphael N., 2015. "Dynamic interaction between markets for leasing and selling automobiles," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 260-270.
    18. Bin Shen & Tsan-Ming Choi & Chris Kwan-Yu Lo, 2015. "Enhancing Economic Sustainability by Markdown Money Supply Contracts in the Fashion Industry: China vs U.S.A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Lin, Zhibing & Cai, Chen & Xu, Baoguang, 2010. "Supply chain coordination with insurance contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 339-345, September.
    20. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & Stephen M. Gilbert, 2009. "Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 918-934, 09-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11386-:d:1199739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.