IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11355-d1199239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Current Portuguese Railway and Future Decarbonization Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Ramos da Silva

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

  • Bruna Moura

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

  • Helena Monteiro

    (Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)

Abstract

Given the current EU decarbonization targets, the railway transport is a key player to boost mobility toward more sustainable transportation, as it is currently the cleanest high-volume mode of locomotion available. However, a study analyzing the life cycle environmental impact of the existing conventional Portuguese railway has never been performed. Aiming to address this research gap, this paper presents an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of the Portuguese railway infrastructure and rolling stock, using the Douro line case study. Through the LCA methodology, the current setting (using electric and diesel rolling stock) and three scenarios of full-line electrification (considering 2019, 2030, and 2050 electricity mixes) were analyzed for hotspot identification and an outlook on EU-aligned long-term sustainability prospects. In the current scenario, railway operation accounts for 74% of the total carbon footprint, mostly due to the fuel use of diesel trains and the expended electricity of electric train and infrastructure operation. The total electrification of the line and rolling stock can reduce carbon emissions by 38%, 56%, and 63%, if the 2019, 2030, and 2050 electricity mixes are considered, respectively. Further reductions could also be achieved with on-site renewable energy generation and through future low-carbon construction work strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Ramos da Silva & Bruna Moura & Helena Monteiro, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Current Portuguese Railway and Future Decarbonization Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11355-:d:1199239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chester, Mikhail V, 2008. "Life-cycle Environmental Inventory of Passenger Transportation in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7n29n303, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Clara Celauro & Andrea Cardella & Marco Guerrieri, 2023. "LCA of Different Construction Choices for a Double-Track Railway Line for Sustainability Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, David & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2012. "The Quantified Traveler: Changing transport behavior with personalized travel data feedback," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3047k0dw, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Sofiia Miliutenko & Ingeborg Kluts & Kristina Lundberg & Susanna Toller & Helge Brattebø & Harpa Birgisdóttir & José Potting, 2014. "Consideration Of Life Cycle Energy Use And Greenhouse Gas Emissions In Road Infrastructure Planning Processes: Examples Of Sweden, Norway, Denmark And The Netherlands," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-26.
    3. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Wojciech SZYMALSKI, 2021. "Energy And Co 2 Emission Intensities Of Various Modes Of Passenger Transport In Warsaw," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(2), pages 131-140, June.
    5. Christian Spreafico & Davide Russo, 2020. "Exploiting the Scientific Literature for Performing Life Cycle Assessment about Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Marinella Giunta, 2023. "Trends and Challenges in Railway Sustainability: The State of the Art regarding Measures, Strategies, and Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Levon Amatuni & Juudit Ottelin & Bernhard Steubing & Jos'e Mogollon, 2019. "Does car sharing reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Life cycle assessment of the modal shift and lifetime shift rebound effects," Papers 1910.11570, arXiv.org.
    8. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt678537sx, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Michael Minn, 2019. "Contested Power: American Long-Distance Passenger Rail and the Ambiguities of Energy Intensity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Ana María Arbeláez Vélez & Andrius Plepys, 2021. "Car Sharing as a Strategy to Address GHG Emissions in the Transport System: Evaluation of Effects of Car Sharing in Amsterdam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Ryerson, Megan S., 2010. "Optimal Intercity Transportation Services with Heterogeneous Demand and Variable Fuel Price," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8696z26t, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Kristoffer W. Lie & Trym A. Synnevåg & Jacob J. Lamb & Kristian M. Lien, 2021. "The Carbon Footprint of Electrified City Buses: A Case Study in Trondheim, Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Simon Robertson, 2013. "High-speed rail's potential for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from short haul aviation: a longitudinal study of modal substitution from an energy generation and renewable energy perspectiv," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 395-412, July.
    14. Ali Azhar Butt & John Harvey & Arash Saboori & Maryam Ostovar & Manuel Bejarano & Navneet Garg, 2020. "Decision Support in Selecting Airfield Pavement Design Alternatives Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Nashville Airport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Rohacs, Jozsef & Rohacs, Daniel, 2020. "Energy coefficients for comparison of aircraft supported by different propulsion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Antonia Rahn & Kai Wicke & Gerko Wende, 2022. "Using Discrete-Event Simulation for a Holistic Aircraft Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, August.
    17. Daniele Soraggi & Gabriele Ivano D’Amato, 2024. "The Limitations of EMSs in Comparison with the SDGs When Considering Infrastructure Sustainability: The Case of the Terzo Valico Dei Giovi, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Rajib Sinha & Lars E. Olsson & Björn Frostell, 2019. "Sustainable Personal Transport Modes in a Life Cycle Perspective—Public or Private?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Igor Kabashkin & Vladimir Perekrestov & Timur Tyncherov & Leonid Shoshin & Vitalii Susanin, 2024. "Framework for Integration of Health Monitoring Systems in Life Cycle Management for Aviation Sustainability and Cost Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-40, July.
    20. Peng Du & Antony Wood & Brent Stephens, 2016. "Empirical Operational Energy Analysis of Downtown High-Rise vs. Suburban Low-Rise Lifestyles: A Chicago Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11355-:d:1199239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.